Good evening from my office situated between two of the three stadiums in Seattle. It is a Wednesday evening at 2315 hrs and I am on my third night of supervising the repairs on one of the 40-ton geothermal heat pumps in our back kitchen. All that’s left to do is install the phase monitor, fire it up and check operation. After that, I can go home to the Hunker-Bunker for the next three or four days.

But you didn’t come here to hear about me, did you? You came to see what kind of crazy shit THAT Guy is going to say next, right? Your lack of response here only tells me how much you are agreeing with me.

Might I also take this time to remind any of you out there hating every word I hang here: If you don’t like what you read here, I would wholeheartedly invite you to come and provide your own content here. I won’t be mad, in fact, I would be absolutely relieved. But I am not going to hold my breath until sometime after the election and Trump is down the road of historical insignificance. Maybe by that time, the Republican/Conservative Party can dump the past eight years or so, regroup, find its footing and regain its proper place again.

Two Consequential Debates

The first debate of the 2024 Presidential election cycle back in June ended the political career of President Joseph R. Biden. The 83-year-old career politician spent most of that debate mumbling and whispering his responses, while former President Donald J. Trump had his way with Biden, blathering out disinformation unchallenged by either Biden or the moderators. Four minutes into that debate, you knew that Trump had won it hands down. Much to Trump’s chagrin, Biden dropped out of the race a few weeks later.

In that debate, age was very much an issue. People who had voted for Biden over Trump just four years ago were shocked to find Biden — never a great orator to begin with — had problems articulating his positions and allowed Trump to run out his usual spiel of misleading bullshit unchallenged. Within a few weeks, he was replaced by Kamala Harris, a younger, 60-year-old woman, who is very articulate in comparison, and is more than capable of stringing complex thoughts together and articulating them.

So now, instead of having two old fossils of questionable mental capacities running for their second terms as president, we now have just one old fossil of questionable mental capacity and a much younger woman vying for that spot.

And the differences were stark.

The Second (and probably the last) Debate of the Silly Season

Make no mistake: Donald Trump is still upset that he isn’t running against Joe Biden. He’s literally cried foul over the fact that Kamala Harris magically became the defacto presidential candidate after Joe Biden was convinced to drop out of the race. He’s referred to this as a “palace coup”, and even brought his grievance up in the debate the other night:

“But when this weak pathetic man that you saw at a debate just a few months ago that if he weren’t in that debate he’d be running instead of her, she got no votes, he got 14 million votes, what you did, you talk about a threat to democracy. He got 14 million votes and they threw him out of office. And you know what? I’ll give you a little secret. He hates her. He can’t stand her.”

“But he had 14 million votes. They threw them out. She got zero votes. And when she ran, she was the first one to leave because she failed. And now she’s running. I don’t understand it but I’m okay with it – because I think we’re going to do pretty well.”

But he’s NOT ‘okay with it’, is he? He’s been bringing up this grievance ever since Biden dropped out. He’s been desperate for a rematch with Joe Biden who is now really showing his age. If Joe had stayed in the race, Trump probably would have won in a landslide, with most voters staying home in disgust.

Let’s be clear: Joe Biden is still in office. Nobody has ‘thrown him out of office’, there was no ‘palace coup’. The reality is this: Joe Biden was convinced by his party that he couldn’t win against Trump this time around, and that if Biden stayed on the ticket, he would be a liability. For some reason, Trump feels this is unfair.

Unfair to who, though? I doubt he really feels this is unfair for Joe. Instead, Trump feels that this is unfair to TRUMP. After all, everything around Trump — is about Trump. Make no mistake, he isn’t running for president because he gives a shit about the United States of America. No, he’s running for president to help himself out. So yeah, Biden dropping out of the race was unfair to TRUMP.

So who won the debate between Trump and Harris?

I guess the first question you have to ask is: Did either side accomplish what they set out to do?

The Trump campaign wanted Trump to tie Kamala Harris to Joe Biden’s policies. They wanted him to point out the Kamala Harris who ran for president in 2020 versus the version she is now. They wanted him to tie her to inflation, and the economy, and the immigration problems.

The Harris campaign wanted her to highlight his age, temperament, and his inability to tell the truth on just about anything. And they really wanted her to push his buttons.

So to answer the question of whether either side accomplished their goals: Kamala Harris is the one who did that in spades.

What do the polls say?

Well, if you exclusively watch Newsmax or OAN, your polling would probably show that Trump won by a landslide. But in most other polling, you will find that Harris won by more than a little.

Here are some random polls that have come out since the debate:

So who is going to use this debate to decide on who to vote for?

I am VERY suspicious of people who haven’t made their mind up yet. From just about every poll out there, the race is a virtual tie at the moment. I think that just about everyone who is going to vote has already made their minds up. They’re just waiting to make their vote official. It’s absolutely strange that there are still people out there who pretend that they still haven’t decided. I call bullshit on them.

An undecided swing state voter watched the debate. It moved the needle

DUNWOODY, Ga. – A small, but potentially crucial slice of voters remain undecided about the presidential election this fall, including in tossup Georgia. Just outside Atlanta, Cameron Lewellen, a father of three little kids, is one of them.

In 2020, Lewellen voted for Joe Biden. But four years prior, he cast his ballot for Trump. And in the last election, he split his ticket between the Republican candidate for governor and the Democrat running for U.S. Senate. With early voting in 2024 a few weeks away, Lewellen has felt stuck.

“This is tough,” he says.

I could see it if the two candidates were indistinguishable from each other. But the differences between the two candidates couldn’t be greater. They are almost polar opposites. If someone can’t make up their mind on something this fundamentally simple, then maybe they should just sit this one out.

Fact-Checking in Real Time

Fact check: A president can’t ban fracking in Pennsylvania

One of the post-debate excuses that Trump made concerning his performance was the real-time fact-checking that the moderators did on both candidates. Trump got hit with 33 fact checks, and Harris got hit with one.

But Trump should have gotten a 34th hit on his saying that Kamala Harris would ban fracking in Pennsylvania. She may or may not want to, but if she were president, she wouldn’t have the ability to ban fracking anywhere outside of property owned by the federal government. The “Leader of the Free World™” just doesn’t have that kind of legal power.

Trump hates to be called a liar. But it certainly doesn’t stop him from lying on a regular basis — even when he doesn’t have to lie — he will lie. It’s pathological. He can’t help himself. So when he gets fact-checked in real time, he will almost always blow a gasket. And he did.

When it was pointed out that there have been NO credible stories of Haitians (or any other group of immigrants) eating pets in Springfield Ohio (or elsewhere), Trump started arguing with the moderators.

Temperament Matters

Is Donald Trump too emotional for this?

When Vice President Kamala Harris said that former President Donald Trump had been fired, his stony face broke into a scoff. When she said that world leaders had called him a disgrace, his eyes revealed a flash of anger. And then, as she cast doubt upon his “temperament,” he became the show to her tell.

Some people have a button to push. Trump has a friggin’ typewriter keyboard of buttons, that if pushed, will result in some kind of angry retort. Kamala Harris knows what many of those buttons are, and she played Trump like a pianist performing a concert during the debate.

“Let me just tell you about world leaders,” Trump responded. With his voice rising, he insisted that the “strongman” leader of Hungary, Viktor Orban, admired him, and he criticized President Biden before pointing his finger at Harris.

“He hates her, he can’t stand her,” Trump declared, as Harris kept a cool half-smile on her lips.

This is not the flex that Trump thinks it is. He loves to brag about how he can get along with all the world’s despicable despots and dictators, and acts like they are his best friends. He WANTS to be liked by the world’s worst leaders. He thinks it is somehow a bad thing if a dictator like Victor Orban dislikes an American president.

Then there was Trump misrepresenting a story and using a family’s pain for his political advancement

Grieving Ohio Father Tells Trump and Vance to Stop Talking About His Son

Barely an hour before the presidential debate the father of an 11-year-old Ohio boy killed when an immigrant’s minivan crashed into a school bus lashed out at Donald J. Trump and his running mate, JD Vance.

Speaking during public comment at a regular meeting of the Springfield City Commission, the father, Nathan Clark, called them “morally bankrupt” politicians spreading hate at the expense of his son, Aiden. Mr. Clark said, “This needs to stop now.”

The death of Aiden Clark, who was thrown from the bus after the minivan driver, who is Haitian, veered into oncoming traffic just over a year ago, shook residents of Springfield, a blue-collar town between Dayton and Columbus. And it touched off a wave of angry rhetoric over the thousands of immigrants from Haiti who have settled in the area since the pandemic.

Police officers gather around a school bus that went off the road and landed on its side in Ohio.

But it was not until Mr. Vance took note in July that the city was thrust into the contentious national immigration debate.

Since then, Mr. Vance has been highlighting the influx of Haitians to Springfield as a detrimental consequence of the Biden administration’s border policies. The immigrants are in the country legally with authorization to work, and they have moved to the Springfield area to fill jobs in manufacturing and other industries.

This week, Mr. Vance doubled down, repeating scurrilous claims that people “who shouldn’t be in this country” were abducting and eating their neighbors’ pets in Springfield. Mr. Trump’s campaign amplified the baseless rumors, even after authorities debunked them.

On Monday, the Trump campaign posted on social media about Aiden, including his photo and that of Hermanio Joseph, the Haitian immigrant who struck the bus.

Then, on Tuesday, Vance referred to Aiden in a post on X, saying that “a child was murdered by a Haitian migrant.”

Standing beside his wife, Danielle, Mr. Clark opened his three-minute speech saying that he wished that his son had been killed by a 60-year-old white man, if only because the family would have been spared the barrage from “hate-spewing people.”

“My son was not murdered,” he said. “He was accidentally killed by an immigrant from Haiti.”

Apparently, neither facts, nor the feelings of the families of the victims involved mean nothing to fucknozzles like JD Vance and Donald Trump. And if there was a hell, I hope they both rot in it.

The Moment Trump Realized the Debate Wasn’t Going Well for Him

As soon as the stagehands announced that the duo were clear for the four-minute commercial break, Trump lunged off the stage and away from the former prosecutor, letting a heavy sigh escape his pursed lips, according to CBS News’s Sara Cook.

Who did it better?

At the 9/11 Memorial on Wednesday:

If you don’t show up, people will notice

This image is the epitome of Trump. The man lives in his glass house and tosses bombs at everyone else, but heaven help anyone who dares to do the same to him.

Okay, it’s 0200 and the HVAC unit is now up and running. I can button things up here and haul my tired ass home.


Discover more from The Anti-Idiotarian Rottwiler

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

By I'm THAT Guy

"Well, ya gotta have someone to yell at"

2 thoughts on “Age and Temperament”
  1. Here’s my answer to your repeated statements that Trump was responsible for the Afghanistan debacle.

    The House Foreign Affairs Committee has just released an exhaustive 353-page report putting on record the sorry episode from beginning to end. The report’s overarching conclusion is that this was a Joe Biden operation from beginning to end.

    You practically weren’t a diplomatic or military official unless you were warning against the withdrawal. As the report notes, the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, the Commander of U.S. Central Command, the Secretary of State, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the Commander of NATO’s Resolute Support Mission and United States Forces all were against it.

    At a NATO ministerial meeting in March 2021 attended by Secretary of State Antony Blinken, NATO representatives strenuously argued against the pull-out. A shaken Blinken relayed the NATO concerns to Biden, saying that they had come at him in “quadraphonic sound.”

    It didn’t matter. Nothing mattered.

    Biden likes to pretend that his hands were tied by the Doha agreement, a deal struck between the Trump administration and the Taliban in February 2020. We would remove U.S. troops if the Taliban met certain obligations.

    Again, as the report notes, a who’s who of officials attested to Taliban violations of the conditions of the Doha agreement — Ambassador Ross Wilson in Afghanistan, the regional security officer for the embassy in Kabul, various diplomats in the embassy, senior State Department officials in Washington, D.C., and senior U.S. military officials.

    When his aides suggested to Biden insisting on “conditionality” before pulling out, he rejected it.

    Everyone sensible knew what was going to happen. The chairman of the joint chiefs, Mark Milley, thought a total withdrawal meant “it was only a matter of when, not if, the Afghan government would collapse and the Taliban would take control.” In a July report, CENTCOM concluded that without the contractors who would depart along with U.S. forces, the crucial Afghan Air Force would be at risk of no longer functioning.

    [[Mark Milley! The most anti-Trump general, so much so that he committed treason by telling China that if Trump won…]

    Obviously, we were slip-sliding toward a repeat of the Fall of Saigon, yet the necessary preparations weren’t taking place. A so-called Dissent Channel cable from alarmed embassy officials urged that we take evacuation planning more seriously, process visa applications from Afghan allies with greater urgency, and do more to secure the safety of those who had helped us.
    [His own State Dept. officials warned him that it would be a disaster. But he wouldn’t listen]

    According to the report, we left behind 1,000 Americans, as well as 90% of Afghans eligible for special visas. We abandoned billions of dollars-worth of weapons and $57 million in currency. The Taliban has been tracking down and killing people who worked with us, creating terrorist safe havens, and holding American hostages.

    No rational person would want to be associated with any of this, but, at the time, Vice President Kamala Harris boasted about being the last person in the room, and she still describes Biden’s decision as “courageous and right.”

    https://jewishworldreview.com/0924/lowry091224.php

    That’s because Biden is a senile, petty little bitch and Harris was the “last person in the room>’

    1. Here’s my answer to your answer:

      Here’s my answer to your repeated statements that Trump was responsible for the Afghanistan debacle.

      It is a lot easier to just give you the TIMELINE of events

      Trump Strikes a Deal

      Feb. 29, 2020 — U.S. and Taliban sign an agreement that sets the terms for a U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan by May 1, 2021, but do not release two classified annexes that set the conditions for U.S. withdrawal. At the time of the agreement, the U.S. had about 13,000 troops in Afghanistan, according to a Department of Defense inspector general report.

      The withdrawal of U.S. troops is contingent on the “Taliban’s action against al-Qaeda and other terrorists who could threaten us,” Trump says in a speech at the Conservative Political Active Conference. (U.S. withdrawals, however, occurred despite the fact that the Defense Department inspector general’s office repeatedly reported that the Taliban worked with al-Qaeda.)

      The pact includes the release of 5,000 Taliban fighters who have been held prisoners by the Afghanistan government, which is not a party to the agreement.

      March 1, 2020 — Afghan President Ashraf Ghani objects to a provision in the agreement that would require his country to release 5,000 Taliban prisoners. “Freeing Taliban prisoners is not [under] the authority of America but the authority of the Afghan government,” Ghani says. “There has been no commitment for the release of 5,000 prisoners.”

      March 4, 2020 — Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley tells the Senate Armed Services Committee that the Taliban pledged in the classified documents not to attack U.S. troops and coalition forces or launch “high-profile attacks,” including in Afghanistan’s 34 provincial capitals. “[T]he Taliban have signed up to a whole series of conditions … all the Members of the Congress have all the documents associated with this agreement,” Milley says.

      Despite the agreement, the Taliban attack Afghan forces in Helmand province, and the U.S. responds with an air strike.

      March 10, 2020 — Under pressure from the U.S., Ghani orders the release of 1,500 Taliban prisoners, but at the rate of 100 per day.

      May 19, 2020 — In releasing its quarterly report on Afghanistan, the DOD inspector general’s office says the U.S. cut troop levels in Afghanistan by more than 4,000, even though “the Taliban escalated violence further after signing the agreement.”

      “U.S. officials stated the Taliban must reduce violence as a necessary condition for continued U.S. reduction in forces and that remaining high levels of violence could jeopardize the U.S.-Taliban agreement,” according to the report, which covered activity from Jan. 1, 2020, to March 31, 2020. “Even still, the United States began to reduce its forces in Afghanistan from roughly 13,000 to 8,600.”

      Aug. 18, 2020 — In releasing a report that covered activity in Afghanistan from April 1, 2020, to June 30, 2020, the Defense Department inspector general’s office says, “The Taliban did not appear to uphold its commitment to distance itself from terrorist organizations in Afghanistan. UN and U.S. officials reported that the Taliban continued to support al-Qaeda, and conducted joint attacks with al-Qaeda members against Afghan National Defense and Security Forces.”

      Sept. 3, 2020 — Afghanistan releases the final 400 Taliban prisoners, as required under the U.S.-Taliban agreement, clearing the way for intra-Afghan peace talks to begin.

      Sept. 12, 2020 — After seven months of delays, Afghanistan government officials and Taliban representatives meet in Qatar for peace talks. The U.S.-Taliban agreement called for the first peace talks to begin on March 10.

      Sept. 16, 2020 — The Taliban continued attacks on government forces. The Voice of America reported that “Taliban attacks in three provinces across northern Afghanistan since Tuesday killed at least 17 people, including six civilians, and wounded scores of others even as a Taliban political team was negotiating peace with Afghan government representatives in Doha, Qatar.”

      Sept. 18, 2020 — At a press conference, Trump says, “We’re dealing very well with the Taliban. They’re very tough, they’re very smart, they’re very sharp. But, you know, it’s been 19 years, and even they are tired of fighting, in all fairness.”

      Nov. 16, 2020 — Congressional Republicans, responding to news reports that the Trump administration will rapidly reduce forces in Afghanistan, warn of what Sen. Marco Rubio calls “a Saigon-type of situation” in Afghanistan. “A rapid withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan now would hurt our allies and delight the people who wish us harm,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says.

      Nov. 17, 2020 — Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller formally announces that the U.S. will reduce U.S. forces in Afghanistan to 2,500 by Jan. 15, 2021.

      On the same day, the Defense Department IG’s office released a report for the quarter ending Sept. 30, 2020, that said the peace negotiations between the Afghan government and Taliban representatives had stalled and violence increased. “At the same time, the Taliban increased its attacks against Afghan forces, leading to ‘distressingly high’ levels of violence that could threaten the peace agreement,” the report said.

      Dec. 2, 2020 — After past false starts, Afghan and Taliban negotiators agree on a framework to govern peace negotiations. “At the same time, the Taliban continued its ‘fight and talk’ strategy, increasing violence across the country to increase its leverage with the Afghan government in negotiations,” the Defense Department IG’s office said a quarterly report covering this period.

      The IG report also continued to warn that the Taliban was apparently violating the withdrawal agreement. “This withdrawal is contingent on the Taliban abiding by its commitments under the agreement, which include not allowing terrorists to use Afghan soil to threaten the United States and its allies,” the report said. “However, it was unclear whether the Taliban was in compliance with the agreement, as members of al-Qaeda were integrated into the Taliban’s leadership and command structure.”

      Jan. 15 — “Today, U.S. force levels in Afghanistan have reached 2,500,” Miller, the acting defense secretary, says in a statement. “[T]his drawdown brings U.S. forces in the country to their lowest levels since 2001.”

      Afghanistan’s First Vice President Amrullah Saleh tells the BBC that the Trump administration made too many concessions to the Taliban. “I am telling [the United States] as a friend and as an ally that trusting the Taliban without putting in a verification mechanism is going to be a fatal mistake,” Saleh says, adding that Afghanistan leaders warned the U.S. that “violence will spike” as the 5,000 Taliban prisoners were released. “Violence has spiked,” he added.

      From this point on, it’s Joe Biden’s mess:

      Biden Follows Through

      Feb. 3 — The Afghanistan Study Group, which was created by Congress in December 2019 and charged with making policy recommendations for a peaceful transition in Afghanistan, releases a report recommending changes to the agreement with the Taliban. “The most important revision is to ensure that a complete withdrawal of U.S. troops is based not on an inflexible timeline but on all parties fulfilling their commitments, including the Taliban making good on its promises to contain terrorist groups and reduce violence against the Afghan people, and making compromises to achieve a political settlement,” it said.

      Feb. 19 — Biden reiterates his campaign promise to bring U.S. troops home from Afghanistan, saying during remarks at the Munich Security Conference, “My administration strongly supports the diplomatic process that’s underway and to bring an end to this war that is closing out 20 years. We remain committed to ensuring that Afghanistan never again provides a base for terrorist attacks against the United States and our partners and our interests.”

      March 7 — Secretary of State Antony Blinken tells Afghanistan President Ashra Ghani that, despite future U.S. financial assistance, he is “concerned that the security situation will worsen and the Taliban could make rapid territorial gains.”

      March 25 — Gen. Richard Clarke, commander of the U.S. Special Operations Command, tells the Senate Armed Services Committee that “it is clear that the Taliban have not upheld what they said they would do and reduce the violence. While…they have not attacked U.S. forces, it is clear that they took a deliberate approach and increased their violence…since the peace accords were signed.”

      March 25 — During a press conference at the White House, Biden says “it’s going to be hard to meet the May 1 deadline. Just in terms of tactical reasons, it’s hard to get those troops out.” He assures that “if we leave, we’re going to do so in a safe and orderly way.” Without committing to a pullout date, Biden says, “it is not my intention to stay there for a long time. But the question is: How and in what circumstances do we meet that agreement that was made by President Trump to leave under a deal that looks like it’s not being able to be worked out to begin with? How is that done? But we are not staying a long time.”

      April 14 — Saying it is “time to end the forever war,” Biden announces that all troops will be removed from Afghanistan by Sept. 11.

      In a speech explaining the decision, Biden says he became convinced after trip to Afghanistan in 2008 that “more and endless American military force could not create or sustain a durable Afghan government.” Biden says the U.S. achieved its initial and primary objective, “to ensure Afghanistan would not be used as a base from which to attack our homeland again” and that “our reasons for remaining in Afghanistan are becoming increasingly unclear.”

      Biden says he “inherited a diplomatic agreement” between the U.S. and the Taliban that all U.S. forces would be out by May 1. “It is perhaps not what I would have negotiated myself, but it was an agreement made by the United States government, and that means something,” Biden says, adding that final troop withdrawal would begin on May 1.

      “We will not conduct a hasty rush to the exit,” Biden says. “We’ll do it responsibly, deliberately, and safely.” Biden assures Americans that the U.S. has “trained and equipped a standing force of over 300,000 Afghan personnel” and that “they’ll continue to fight valiantly, on behalf of the Afghans, at great cost.”

      April 15 — In response to Biden’s decision to delay full withdrawal until Sept. 11, the Taliban releases a statement that says failure to complete the withdrawal by May 1 “opens the way for [the Taliban] to take every necessary countermeasure, hence the American side will be held responsible for all future consequences.”

      April 18 — In a released statement, Trump criticizes Biden’s Sept. 11 withdrawal deadline saying, “we can and should get out earlier.” He concludes, “Getting out of Afghanistan is a wonderful and positive thing to do. I planned to withdraw on May 1st, and we should keep as close to that schedule as possible.”

      May 18 — The Defense Department IG releases a report for the first three months of 2021 that says the Taliban had increased its attacks against Afghanistan government forces during this period and appears to be preparing with al-Qaeda for “large-scale offensives.”

      “The Taliban initiated 37 percent more attacks this quarter than during the same period in 2020,” the report said. “According to the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Taliban maintained close ties with al-Qaeda and was very likely preparing for large-scale offensives against population centers and Afghan government installations.”

      May 18 — In a House hearing on U.S. policy in Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad, the U.S. special representative for Afghanistan reconciliation, downplays the prospect of a swift Taliban takeover when U.S. forces leave. “If they [Taliban] pursue, in my judgment, a military victory, it will result in a long war, because Afghan security forces will fight, other Afghans will fight, neighbors will come to support different forces,” Khalilzad says.

      Later Khalilzad added, “I personally believe that the statements that the [Afghan] forces will disintegrate, and the Talibs will take over in short order are mistaken. The real choices that the Afghans will face is between a long war and negotiated settlement.”

      June 8 — Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid tells Foreign Policy that after foreign forces leave Afghanistan the group’s goal is to create an “Islamic government,” and “we will be compelled to continue our war to achieve our goal.”

      June 26 — At a rally in Ohio, his first since leaving office, Trump boasts that Biden can’t stop the process he started to remove troops from Afghanistan, and acknowledges the Afghan government won’t last once U.S. troops leave.

      “I started the process,” Trump says. “All the troops are coming back home. They [the Biden administration] couldn’t stop the process. 21 years is enough. Don’t we think? 21 years. They couldn’t stop the process. They wanted to, but it was very tough to stop the process when other things… It’s a shame. 21 years, by a government that wouldn’t last. The only way they last is if we’re there. What are we going to say? We’ll stay for another 21 years, then we’ll stay for another 50. The whole thing is ridiculous. … We’re bringing troops back home from Afghanistan.”

      July 6 — The U.S. military confirms it has pulled out of Bagram Airfield, its largest airfield in the Afghanistan, as the final withdrawal nears.

      July 8 — Saying “speed is safety,” Biden moves up the timeline for full troop withdrawal to Aug. 31. Biden acknowledges the move comes as the Taliban “is at its strongest militarily since 2001.” Biden says if he went back on the agreement that Trump made, the Taliban “would have again begun to target our forces” and that “staying would have meant U.S. troops taking casualties. … Once that agreement with the Taliban had been made, staying with a bare minimum force was no longer possible.”

      Biden assures Americans that a Taliban takeover of Afghanistan “is not inevitable,” and denies that U.S. intelligence assessed that the Afghan government would likely collapse.

      Asked if he sees any parallels between the withdrawals from Vietnam Afghanistan, Biden responds, “None whatsoever. Zero. … The Taliban is not the south — the North Vietnamese army. They’re not — they’re not remotely comparable in terms of capability. There’s going to be no circumstance where you see people being lifted off the roof of a embassy in the — of the United States from Afghanistan. It is not at all comparable.”

      Biden adds that “the likelihood there’s going to be the Taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country is highly unlikely.”

      Biden also promises to help accelerate the issuance of special visas for Afghan nationals who helped the U.S. during the war.

      July 24 — At a rally in Phoenix, Trump again boasts, “I started the move out of Afghanistan,” adding “I think it was impossible for him [Biden] to stop it, but it was a much different deal.”

      Trump says that when he was president, in a phone conversation with the leader of the Taliban, he warned that after U.S. troops leave if “you decide to do something terrible to our country … we are going to come back and we are going to hit you harder than any country has ever been hit.” Trump says he believes the two “had a real understanding” but that after Trump left office “now they’re going wild over there.”

      Aug. 6 — The Taliban takes control of its first province — the capital of Nimroz province in Afghanistan — despite the agreement it signed with the U.S.

      Aug. 15 — Taliban fighters enter the Afghanistan capital Kabul; the Afghan president flees the country; U.S. evacuates diplomats from its embassy by helicopter.

      Aug. 16 — In a speech to the nation, Biden says, “I do not regret my decision to end America’s warfighting in Afghanistan,” and deflected blame for the government’s swift collapse.

      “The truth is: This did unfold more quickly than we had anticipated. So what’s happened? Afghanistan political leaders gave up and fled the country. The Afghan military collapsed, sometimes without trying to fight,” the president said. “If anything, the developments of the past week reinforced that ending U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan now was the right decision.”

Comments are closed.

 

Discover more from The Anti-Idiotarian Rottwiler

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading