Tuesday at a White House Public Health and Climate Change Summit, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said “normal people,” not “climate deniers” will win the fight on global warming.
So it’s a fight now? Climate Change will be once and for all decided in a best out of five cage match between “normal people” and, er, “abnormals?”
Will it be on pay per view?
McCarthy said, “When I put a report out on acting on climate like we did yesterday that shows how dramatically our world will change if we don’t act, and just the benefits we can deliver if we do. I am doing that not to push back on climate deniers. You can have fun doing that if you want, but I’ve batted my head against the wall too many times…
Wait up, hon… We need clarification on that one. How do you “bat your head against the wall”, exactly? Is that something that us “abnormals” can’t do due to a physical defect or something? Pardon us if we’re sounding ignorant here, but we are, after all, not “normal.” Do you detach your head from your shoulder, grab it by the long point on the top and smack it repeatedly against a wall? Or do you nail it to a 2×4 first? It’s all so very puzzling to us.
Thank G-d the Obama administration is making appointments for high office solely based on the possession of a vagina and/or high melanin concentrations in the skin! Where would this country be if we went purely by literacy and basic qualifications?
and if the science already hasn’t changed their mind it never will.”
“But in any democracy, it’s not them that carries the day. It is normal human beings that haven’t put their stake into politics above science. It’s normal human beings that want us to do the right thing, and we will if you help us.”
Thank G-d that in a democracy, science and actual proof has nothing to do with making decisions! And, even more so, that those “abnormals”, “deviants”, “subhumans”, “undesirables”, which one would you prefer? (we have more, but they all sound better in the original German), have nothing to do with it.
P.S.: Since day one of the Glowbull Wormening nonsense, we’ve been struggling to find out how one can be a “climate denier”. It’s rather important too, seeing as how we’re called that all the time if we exhibit even the slightest shred of basic intelligence and adherence to the scientific method. So how do you do that, exactly? Do you point angrily at the skies when it’s snowing and proclaim that it isn’t snowing, that you, being a “climate denier”, deny that climate exists and therefore it is not snowing after all?
Much like Marxists deny that market forces exist and, in so doing, expect them to disappear? It surely would be helpful to their theory, wouldn’t it? It might even make the implementation of it work for once in all of history. Imagine a society where everything is free, where you can get something for nothing, where people are willing to work for free as many hours as is needed while still being able to afford everything they want without having to work at all, which they do for free, which they don’t have to, because why would they when everything is free anyways, provided by people who created it by not working, and doing it for free, even though they were work…
Ouch. Our head hurts.
Maybe we should go bat it against a wall. Once Gina tells us how to do that.