Yeah Sure Right Whatever, Rubio

Pursuing his desperate attempts to make people forget he’s a liar who specifically got elected on promises of never, ever, under any circumstances accepting any sort of amnesty which, as he defined it himself, was “any sort of path to citizenship.”

And then, safely elected on this lie, promptly turned around and pretended that he’d never said any such thing, going full bore supporting McShitstain/Grahamnesty in yet ANOTHER push for amnesty for felons.

As a result, it really doesn’t matter one tiny little iota of a shit what he says, because we already KNOW that his word is worth absolutely fuck all. If he can go from “any sort of path to citizenship is amnesty, no matter what they call it, and I’m against it” to “this particular path to citizenship that I endorse is absolutely NOT amnesty” in a matter of months, then just how bloody retarded do you have to be to ever trust a single word he says ever again?

What else is he willing to lie about for short term gain? He’s already proven beyond a reasonable doubt that his word means absolutely nothing as soon as he sees an advantage in forgetting he ever gave it.

But he’s learned something. He’s learned how to hedge better.

Senator Marco Rubio wouldn’t call for Health and Human Services secretary Kathleen Sebelius to resign now, but he indicated he may do so later on.

Provided that Marco “Me, Myself, I” Rubio sees an advantage to him, personally, in doing so. If not, at least he won’t have those pesky TeaTards quoting him word for word lying about this too.

“Her refusal to testify and be transparent about it, I think, is undermining her credibility,” he said.

And did we just wake up in an alternate reality where Congress can’t subpoena anybody to testify anymore? Because that would seem to us to be the logical next step but, then again, we’re just going by the Constitution, “uncivil, unpragmatic wacko bird” that we are. Granted, this one’s not on Marcus Iscariot as it is the House who’d have to issue the subpoena.

Which they won’t. Because they couldn’t locate a testicle among them if they started an intensive, concerted search for one.

But we’re sure that Darrel “jaw, jaw, jaw” Issa will have a lot of “hearings” where he’s talking to himself in order to pretend that he is in the least bit interested in ever actually achieving any sort of results.

Useless cowards. Hang them all.

Thatisall.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 20, 2013 19:44

Testicles in washington? Shirley you jest.

emily_nelson
emily_nelson
October 20, 2013 20:25

Please exempt Ted Cruz, He is most definitely NOT for amnesty.

LC IB CiSSnarl5.7 Imperial Foreign War Correspondent
LC IB CiSSnarl5.7 Imperial Foreign War Correspondent
October 20, 2013 21:34

“Her refusal to testify and be transparent about it, I think, is undermining her credibility,” he said.

Says the moron with Z-E-R-O Credibility!! Takes one to know one I guess.

angrywebmaster
angrywebmaster
October 21, 2013 06:11

Library Czar @ #:

Testicles in washington? Shirley you jest.

He’s not jesting and STOP calling him Shirley!
:em05:
:em07:

HempRopeAndStreetlight
HempRopeAndStreetlight
October 21, 2013 10:29

Evil useless bastards. Hangin’s too good for ’em.

October 21, 2013 15:43

What was discovered was who is and is not in the fight. As LC gladiator recently listed for us, it is now known who hasn’t the cojones. ……………… As to how and why Issa has not been more vigorous to date remains a valid question. Non-disclosure agreements seem a little strange by letter of the law, but then we have… Read more »

Igor, Imperial Booby
Igor, Imperial Booby
October 21, 2013 16:55

Isn’t Rubio also supporting McCockless’ re-election campaign as well? I thought I’d heard that somewhere as well. Any truth?

VonZorch Imperial Researcher
VonZorch Imperial Researcher
October 21, 2013 18:52

The Repugnanticans only have one testicle to go around. Currently Ted Cruz has it, and he doesn’t appear interested in giving it back.

LibraryGryffon
LibraryGryffon
October 21, 2013 20:13

Saw this over at HotAir, and it perfectly describes what’s going on, with one side (R) still thinking there are rules and playing by them and the other (D) doing whatever they damn well want.

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-supersessionists-of-liberal.html

HempRopeAndStreetlight
HempRopeAndStreetlight
October 21, 2013 22:02

http://www.salon.com/2013/10/20/just_secede_already_the_obstructionists_arent_going_anywhere_maybe_we_should/

And in related news… seems the libs want us gone too! Amicable split! Perfect!

I’ll happily handle the paperwork on this pro bono.

:em01:

LC Xystus
LC Xystus
October 22, 2013 04:19

Hemp@10.

That piece has little to recommend it–only complaints about conservatives (who are assumed to be villains) & contempt for the South.

HempRopeAndStreetlight
HempRopeAndStreetlight
October 22, 2013 09:39

Indeed it’s full of stupid mealymouthed prog-Nazi claptrap. But hey, if they want us gone, we’ll be more than happy to oblige them. They can sit in their coastal deathtraps and starve in the cold and the dark. They seem to think they don’t need our coal, oil, and crops, let them try to survive on solar and wind.

:em05: