Up is Down, Peace is War, and Obama is an Intellectual

Oh, and banning racial preferences is apparently in violation of the equal protection clause (h/t Ace).

You read that right. That wasn’t a typo. According to a federal appeals court, Michigan’s ban on using racial discrimination in university admissions is unconstitional and in violation of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. Just let that sink in for a bit. Of course, the usual racists are calling this a giant victory of racial equality:

George Washington, the chief attorney for the law’s opponents, applauded the decision today.

“It’s a great victory. It means affirmative action is legal again in college admissions. It means that thousands of talented black, Latino and Native Americans can go to our public universities,” Washington said.

And it, of course, also means that an equal number of thousands of even more talented (their grades didn’t require a melanin-based boost, after all) non-minorities won’t be going to those same schools, but let’s not talk about that. That would be raaaaacist.

Let’s turn it around: Let’s say that some state in the union got taken over by drooling, knuckle-headed fuckwit White Pride scumbags and they decided to give Caucasians a grade boost to help them get ahead in the line for college admissions. You think somebody might stand up and say “what the everloving fuck? Didn’t our ancestors fight and die to END that kind of primitive, barbarian, Nazi bullshit?” I know His Imperial Majesty would be among the ones to do so, and we wouldn’t exactly be mild and well-mannered about it either. There might be angry words. And high-powered rifle bullets.

And we’d, for once, find ourselves on the same side as liberals but we’re willing to pay that price if the cause is just.

Don’t give me any sob stories about under-privileged “darkies” who were trying hard to work their way out of a working class background but would have never made it if it hadn’t been for obviously racist preferences, because we know just as many “whiteys” who had to work their arses off too to escape their background. We were one of them. We were blessed, by G-d, so we didn’t have any need of race-based boosts to our grades to get where we went, but that doesn’t change the facts.

Besides, we didn’t have racist affirmative action laws where I come from. Hmmm… Maybe the socialist troglodytes in my native country were right on something after all: The United States actually IS a more racist country than where I came from. Only, of course, they got the racism bit exactly wrong, but that’s socialists for you. If you’re ever in a situation where you have to make a choice and you can’t for the life of you determine which one is the better one, ask a socialist. Then do the exact opposite. You’ll win every single time. But we digress.

The bottom line is this: To me, and to people like me, racism is wrong. Period. End. Stop. It’s always wrong. There are no “qualifiers”, no “best intentions”, no exceptions.

Racism. Is. Wrong.

Dead wrong. Wrong on so many levels, and wrong to the level where taking the life of a true racist is, in my humble opinion, something that falls under “pest control” and should be rewarded by society, not punished. No harm, no foul. It’s not like a racist has any use to civilized society.

Always. It’s not only wrong when it’s directed at one particular group and OK when directed at another.

It’s wrong.

And to get back to the legal aspect, the 14th Amendment doesn’t, near as my mind can see, anywhere mention that there’s an exception to the equal protection clause when the ones being discriminated against have less and a certain amount of melanin in their skin passed on to them from their parents.

Prove me wrong.

Or just go hang the racist judges in Michigan.

Thatisall.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
July 1, 2011 23:44

Some animals are more equal than others………

LC Spare Parts
LC Spare Parts
July 2, 2011 00:21

My Liege You simply do not understand their definition of Civil Rights. It means that privileges which their betters worked for and earned really belong to them, because politics as defined by Democrats is “who gets what.” The only thing a white man can keep them out of is his own house. And earning anything is an imposition. Life is… Read more »

lc purple raider
lc purple raider
July 2, 2011 01:44

This is why I say that the absolute worst racists on the planet are marxists/socialists.

Because while they say they are for equality, their equality is so much better.

LC LOBO
LC LOBO
July 2, 2011 03:07

The only thing a white man can keep them out of is his own house.

Unless you live in Indiana.

Elephant Man
Elephant Man
July 2, 2011 05:57

(moonbat) But….but…but what about the plight of minorities being held back by the hob-nailed jackboot of “The Man”?!? After all, it’s only FAIR that minorities get to enjoy the fruits of preferential treatment after 300+ years of 2nd class status! It is appalling that people are judged by the color of their skin rather then their abilities and …er…uh….. Hmmmmppph… Read more »

GamerFromJump
GamerFromJump
July 2, 2011 11:11

Letting the race hustlers determine when the past is adequately “reconciled” is rather like taking a loan from the Mob. You’re never paid off, as the vig will wipe out any and all progress.

Only, in this case, it’s a loan we didn’t take out in the first place, but are stuck with unless we go break their kneecaps.

GamerFromJump
GamerFromJump
July 2, 2011 11:25

I notice that that most-wrongly-named-since-the-Taliban* induhvidual mentioned “blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans”. What, no Asians? Moonbat: “But their not disadvantaged by history!” Bullshit. Google “US railroads Chinese” sometime. Or, if that’s too far back for you, how about the Japanese? There are people living today who were in camps, or children of same. Not a single black person living today… Read more »

LC Xystus
LC Xystus
July 2, 2011 14:52

George Washington, the chief attorney for the law’s opponents, applauded the decision today. Someone should remind him he bears the name of a famous slave owner Oh the shame! GamerFromJump: Neanderthals are technically subhuman, and don’t deserve to be in the same category as the Taliban. Actually they appear to be an early version of Caucasian, & their cranial capacity… Read more »

LC Xystus
LC Xystus
July 2, 2011 14:55

I see our ITW has eliminated the editing function yet again–but his joke box still starts up when I bail out!

LC LOBO
LC LOBO
July 2, 2011 17:33

LC Xystus growls and barks:
July 2, 2011 at 2:55 pm

I see our ITW has eliminated the editing function yet again–but his joke box still starts up when I bail out!

Firefox with Ad Blocker Plus. It had to be done, as the box would load a blank black space, or take ten minutes loading.

Samsapeel1
Samsapeel1
July 2, 2011 21:04

I found this part of the numbcunt’s quote interesting: “It’s a great victory. It means affirmative action is legal again in college admissions.” I took the decision to mean that affirmative action MUST be applied in college admissions, NOT that it is merely o.k. to do it. In other words, the court appears to say that a college CAN’T NOT… Read more »

Imperial Grammar Nazi, G.L.O.R
Imperial Grammar Nazi, G.L.O.R
July 3, 2011 10:35

GamerFromJump opines: I notice that that most-wrongly-named-since-the-Taliban* induhvidual mentioned “blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans”. What, no Asians? I taught college for 15 years. There was no group which acted more entltled than the blacks. The Latinos tried, but they just really couldn’t cut it. I never had any American Indians (that I’m aware of, anyway), so I can’t speak about… Read more »