Can You Say Backfire Boys and Girls?

Sure you can. I knew you could.

It’s a well known fact that how you phrase a question can determine the answer, pollsters base their business model on it. For example;

Q; Would you kill a puppy?

Poll results; 99% of respondents are against puppy murder! (The other 1% are those charming miscreants over at 4chan).

Now, let’s rephrase that question:

Q; Would you kill a rabid dingo mauling your infant?

Poll results; 99% of respondents support saving babies lives. (There’s 4chan in that 1% again).

Here is another, almost as blatant example.

Ogabe and his communist cocksucker minions were really on the ball this time, suggesting gun control before an accurate body count was even available after the Oregon shooting. Of course they’re staying pretty silent about the killer’s choice of victims, but what else do we expect at this point. But this “poll” was definitely not their A game. A sub-retarded Baghdad Bob imitator on flakka could have been more subtle.

Since taking office seven years ago, the president has sought changes in the nation’s gun laws – such as expanded background checks, stricter magazine limits and an assault weapons ban – which would have prevented the recent massacre in Oregon.

Uhmmmm, sorry Skippy, no they wouldn’t have. First off, I haven’t heard any details about the types of firearms used or how he obtained them, so how in the ever loving fuck do you know what laws would have prevented it? Karnac the Great is impressed, Edwin R. Murrow not so much. Starting off the article with a flat out lie (Or to be generous, an agenda) is modern “journalism” at it’s finest.

And let’s just lay it out in plain language, you CAN NOT prevent a random nut from committing evil. Even the most invasive and omnipotent Orwellian wet dream can not control every single thought and act. Stalinist Russia, Nazi Germany, even Orwell’s Oceania all had dissidents. If a truly statist utopia like Airstrip One can’t prevent illicit acts, how can we expect to do so in a supposedly free republic? Prior restraint is a statist tool to control dissent; it is not and never could be an effective way to prevent such a horrific act from occurring. The cold hard truth is that you can only stop it, never prevent it. Idealist libtards of course can’t see that. They believe in the quick, emotion based and doomed to failure knee jerk response. They prefer to bury their head and pretend the boogey man doesn’t exist, than to have to face the scary reality and prepare, or allow others to prepare, to confront it. And the statists will play on that insecurity to grab more power for themselves. And when their “prevention” efforts fail, as they must, they have even still more ammo to go after even more restrictive laws. It’s a never ending cycle of the issue that keeps on giving.

So back to our example of that strategy at work;

Over the past several years, Obama has traveled to Aurora, Colorado; Tucson, Arizona; Charleston, South Carolina, and many other cities to mourn victims of gun violence. The White House’s failed push for gun control legislation after the 2012 Newtown, Connecticut, shooting — in which 20 children and six adults were killed at an elementary school – deeply frustrated Obama.

Good, a “frustrated” wanna be third world tyrant with delusions of imperial grandeur is a plus for liberty. A lot of “good crises” gone to waste there huh Ogabe? I can almost taste the wispy liberal tears. Good thing too, because next to dick blood, liberal tears are better than oxi-clean and I’ve got some soap scum and Romanian hooker remains to clean up.

And they weren’t victims of “gun violence”, whatever the fuck that is. They were the victims of drugged up psychopaths, many of whom probably should have been in an institution. Except that we can’t do that anymore. Nope, just rewire their brains with psychotropic drugs and turn them loose on society. When they snap we’ll make sure that they have shoot houses full of unarmed prey, a virtual safari of teddy bears just waiting for the next slaughter.

Are you frustrated too?

Yup, frustrated that we have to constantly keep smacking you fascist wannabes back up the unicorn’s ass.

Let us know on social media and vote in our poll.

Be careful what you wish for there skippy. As of 2121 EST on Sunday 10/04/15, the results were as follows;

Would you support stricter gun laws?
No 96.99% (17,462 votes)
Yes 2.62% (472 votes)
Undecided 0.39% (70 votes)
Total Votes: 18,004

I’m posting the results and time and dating it before the fairy dust sniffing, tofu eating, granola farting, prius driving, choad nuzzling, long haired, vegan commie fruit loops realize how bad the poll backfired and memory-hole it.

They should be beaten to death with a baby spotted owl.

Go and vote while you can and make a proto-commie cry.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 5, 2015 00:33

The only people who benefit from polls are pollsters. The simple manipulation of a vaguely-phrased question to obtain the desired result of their employer is insanity. They literally go out and trick people into saying the things they want so they can attempt to claim they didn’t lie. “My client sells vanilla ice cream. They are attempting to draw business… Read more »

October 5, 2015 05:26

I answered that poll yesterday/ Interesting how 97 percent are saying no to more laws.
And I put 200 rounds through my new Sig P220 over the weekend.
(Need to look into a short reset trigger job for it too. Not happy with the stock trigger)

LC SecondMouse
LC SecondMouse
October 5, 2015 11:38

Having been in the business of using data to drive decision-making for much of my life, I feel compelled to share some of my favorite relevant observations: “Statistics can be tortured to confess to anything.” “There are three types of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics.” “Statistics are no substitute for judgment.” “Statistics are often used like a drunk uses… Read more »

October 5, 2015 17:21

Poll statistics as of 4:20 MDT, 10/5/2015:

No 96.92% (26,912 votes)
Yes 2.65% (737 votes)
Undecided 0.42% (117 votes)
Total Votes: 27,766

Remember, if it’s not close, they can’t cheat!

LC Jackboot IC/A
LC Jackboot IC/A
October 6, 2015 03:23

LC 0311 Sir Crunchie I.M.H., K.o.E. says: angrywebmaster @ #: Yeah, Sig triggers can be a bit sloppy, especially if your used to a shorter reset. LC 0311 Sir Crunchie I.M.H., K.o.E. recently posted..Can You Say Backfire Boys and Girls? Oh Really now? C’mon Brother, You’ve put some lead down-range from my own personal 229 and I don’t recall any… Read more »

LC Xystus
LC Xystus
October 6, 2015 18:01

LC Jackboot IC/A says:

Governance that attempts to insulate the governed from any and all theoretical dangers is factually ensuring extinction by eliminating the very processes required for survival.

Too bad this extinction doesn’t preferentially apply to the perpetrators–or doesn’t it? :em03:

October 7, 2015 01:41

The publisher of the Roseburg Beacon appeared on “The O’Reilly Factor” Monday night and didn’t mince words about President Obama’s admitted politicization of the shooting at his city’s Umpqua Community College. David Jaques reacted to Obama’s plan to visit Roseburg on Friday to meet with the families of shooting victims, saying he’s “not welcome,” because residents believe he will “grandstand… Read more »

BC, Imperial Torturer
BC, Imperial Torturer
October 7, 2015 22:12

Here’s the latest screenshot from around 11:10 pm on 10/7/15. The gun-grabbin’ assmonkeys are still gettin’ their little squirrel pokers stomped in the dirt. (You may have to click the pic to enlarge it to see the numbers.)


LC Sir Clambake, Imperial Black Ops Technician, K.o.E.
LC Sir Clambake, Imperial Black Ops Technician, K.o.E.
October 8, 2015 11:14

Sparky Tolmeister @ #1: Your comment was poetry.

LC Sir Clambake, Imperial Black Ops Technician, K.o.E.
LC Sir Clambake, Imperial Black Ops Technician, K.o.E.
October 8, 2015 11:15

readerjp @ #8: As was yours.