That Didn’t Take Long.

Teh Magic Negro sure is a multitasker. Not content with selling our grandchildren into indentured servitude, releasing terrorists, surrendering in Iraq, ad nauseum; his march to shred the Constitution and destroy our Republic continues. He’s a student of history after all, and knows that in order for a  tyrant to succeed, the people must be disarmed, lest they have the means to resist.

The Obama administration will seek to reinstate the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 during the Bush administration, Attorney General Eric Holder said today.

But of course, it worked so well before. The sad thing is that I’m not really surprised by this. Just one more nail in the coffin.

“As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons,” Holder told reporters.

Just a few changes, nothing big. Just some minor changes to make it impossible for the serfs to possess the means to resist the Great Leap Forward.

Holder said that putting the ban back in place would not only be a positive move by the United States, it would help cut down on the flow of guns going across the border into Mexico, which is struggling with heavy violence among drug cartels along the border.

“I think that will have a positive impact in Mexico, at a minimum.”

Piss all over the Constitution to have a positive impact in Mexico, got it. Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

Holder declined to offer any time frame for the reimplementation of the assault weapons ban, however.

Just as soon as the Civilian Defence Force ObamaJugend is armed up and trained, I’m sure.

In a brief interview with ABC News, Wayne LaPierre, president of the National Rifle Association, said, “I think there are a lot of Democrats on Capitol Hill cringing at Eric Holder’s comments right now.”

The ones that remember the 1994 mid-terms anyway. Don’t worry guys, I’m sure Teh One™ will just do it through Executive Order Imperial fiat.

“I think closing the gun show loophole,

Which they refuse to actually define, except by using false terminology like “unlicensed dealers”. Nice and convenient to speak in such bland generalities, rather than actually talk specifics which can easily be refuted. Once again, feeewwings over facts and rational thought.

the banning of cop-killer bullets

Also undefined. Also convenient word play. What they leave unsaid is that the only ammunition still legally on the market which can defeat body armor is common rifle ammo, of every caliber.

and I also think that making the assault weapons ban permanent, would be something that would be permitted under Heller,”

Time for Heller v 2.0. Simple civics lesson for ya Holder. We’ll keep it simple since ever since you told me to confront my racism and stop being a coward, I’ve been able to realize that “you people” aren’t as bright as the rest of us. Let’s focus on just one word in the 2nd Amendment, “Arms”. You know, those things that the Amendment protects. Arms is defined by Merriam Websters as “a means (as a weapon) of offense or defense ; especially : firearm.” An even more specific definition, one in common use at the time of the ratification, is “weapons suitable for, or used by, infantry”. What would that be today Holder boopie?

The Assault Weapons Ban signed into law by President Clinton in 1994 banned 19 types of semi-automatic military-style guns and ammunition clips with more than 10 rounds.

Time  to trot out that lil’ ol’ piece of journalistic tripe again eh? The “19” types of guns banned were actually closer to 200 named types, and plenty others that met the BS criteria based on cosmetic accoutrement. I wonder what this version will look like? BTW, they’re called MAGA fucking ZINES, not CLIPS you fucking illiterate cretins! Research the topic you intend to write about you fucking moron.

The more things Change™ the more they stay the same. Lets see where we stand.

Ballot box – Thanks to Acorn and the civic illiteracy of 52% of the populace, that ones gone.

Soap box – Fairness doctrine anyone? We still have it for now, but that ones in their sights as well.

Jury box – We’ll see how well that one holds up. So far not so good.

Cartridge box – Getting real close.

Gird you loins pups, gonna be a long fight ahead of us.

57 comments

  1. 51
  2. 52
    LC Proud Infidel says:

    I CAN NOT trust an administration that doesn’t trust me in owning a firearm, end of statement.

  3. 53
    LC FreedomFighter says:

    Due to training and various other life experiences I thought ‘I’ was an assault weapon

    Fist VS. Gun…..I choose Gun.

    When you dis-arm the law-abiding public, then only the criminals and the government will have weapons.

    Just ask Hitler How well it work.

    he who shoots firstist with the mostest wins. let god sort them out.

    Just tell me when to squeze.

    Pelosi throws cold water on weapons ban

    Because she know how well it worked last time. Plus they have more important things to worry bout at the
    moment.

    The good news is that the government is most likely going to collapse before they get around to taking our guns

    Good or bad guns owners will be the law makers then.

    Really. In my somewhat reasoned opinion, I think he is four weeks behind schedule. I expected him to start banning weapons by the end of January at the latest.

    If he was smart he would have done that first. Waiting just sell more guns.

    I kinda doubt it will pass congress…….but I have been wrong before

    So have we all. And i dont know bout you but im not willing to bet my freedoms or my families on the WHAT IF.

    I will let all of you know if I see anything, but really, put down the tinfoil hat. If this kid was a company commander or such I would believe it, but it sounds like a latrine rumor.

    Im in the guard also and to be honest we… as the ground man will never see it til were in the breif and the OP order is handed down. Like i said already im not willing to bet…unless its the lotto. To many nations in the past have thought the same why as you and have suffered for their inability to be prepared. 3 is 2, 2 is 1, have a redundency plan just in case.

    People who know the military are confident of what will happen when they are asked to break their oath

    I hope that the entire military might feels this way but remeber some of them did vote with the 52. on what percentage im not sure, I only hope is small.

    Well I believe we can all breath a sigh of relief, just found out that that even Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi aren’t dumb enough to even consider passing the new assault weapons ban

    Not yet anyway.

    After Katrina:

    Louisiana National Guardsmen took the oath.

    They also took the weapons.

    Why didn’t they refuse?

    Good Question!

    Iowa’s governor Culver is a Democrat.

    Out of curiosity, what brings this into relevance?

    The National guard follows the orders of the Gov. of the state. And only when the Fed ask for the states help are they allowed to be deployed in an operation.

    I CAN NOT trust an administration that doesn’t trust me in owning a firearm, end of statement.

    Amen Brother, :em96: :em96: :em96: :em96: :em96: :em96: :em96: :em96: :em96: :em96: :em96:

  4. 54
    Cannon Fodder says:

    I really don’t understand how it is that so many people are challenging the legitimacy of TehOne’s presidency and their cases are just being arbitrarily swept under the rug. This is information that should have been brought to light before the election when people were asking for the proof!

  5. 55
    LC hilljohnny says:

    Cannon Fodder sez:

    I really don’t understand how it is that so many people are challenging the legitimacy of TehOne’s presidency and their cases are just being arbitrarily swept under the rug.

    could it be the Democrat leadership pushed Mr. Obama into the presidency because he would be easy to control since they could disclose the truth at any time?

  6. 56
    LC Wil, S.C.E. says:

    From SEVEN HABITS OF HIGHLY EFFECTIVE PIRATES:

    6. If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.

    27. Don’t be afraid to be the first to resort to violence.

    35. That which does not kill you has made a tactical error.

    37. There is no ‘overkill.’ There is only ‘open fire’ and ‘time to reload.’

  7. 57
    LC TerribleTroy, Imperial Centurion says:

    LC Wil, S.C.E. @:

    37 is a keeper…… :em01:

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.