Unf**kingbelievable

Speechless…just f*cking speechless.

Self-proclaimed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and four other Guantanamo Bay detainees will be brought to trial in a civilian federal courthouse in New York, blocks from site of the devastating 2001 terror attacks.

114 comments

  1. 51
    LC TerribleTroy, Imperial Centurion says:

    It isnt a matter of wether they deserve to be tried under our criminal system.. the question is do they qualify? Are they criminals or combatatants?

  2. 52
    Coldtype says:

    anonymous hourly worker sez:

    What happens if they’re acquitted?

    They go home.

    Just as would be the case if you were accused of a crime and then… acquitted. That’s the way a functioning legal system works. The alternative is a system of kangaroo courts in which the “guilt” of the accused is preordained. Naturally this would lead to travesties whereby the accused could be charged and convicted based on “confessions” obtained through torture… oh… wait, never mind.

  3. 53
    Elephant Man says:

    Coldtype sez:

    They go home.

    Never mind that they already said they’re guilty.

    Just as would be the case if you were accused of a crime and then… acquitted.

    As long as you don’t plead… guilty.

    That’s the way a functioning legal system works.

    Thus sayeth Captain Obvious.

    The alternative is a system of kangaroo courts in which the “guilt” of the accused is preordained.

    TRANSLATION: The U.S. military is eeeeevil and would never give those “poor little brown people” a fair shake…

    Naturally this would lead to travesties whereby the accused could be charged and convicted based on “confessions” obtained through torture… oh… wait, never mind.

    We were much better off treating acts of terrorism as a civilian matter. After all, it’s not like they’re going to do something like hijack planes and fly them into buildings… oh… wait, never mind.

  4. 54
    LC FreedomFighter says:

    Princess Natasha, Decadent Delicious Deviant says:
    Not only will they be acquitted, but Obama will hire them to be his Czars of one sort or another. That, or they’ll get full professorships at Harvard and other Ivy League fever swamps. This country is soooo fucked. Also, I’d like to punch the ratfuck “attorney” defending them square in the cockholster.

    Sure why not, Bill Ayers did it.

    useless says:
    The only reason to bring them to the US is to give them a “Fair” trial, in that the government can protect their rights of not being accused without proof. So, here’s the clincher; if you bring them here you are expressing doubt in the veracity of the charges. If you bring them here and “expect” them to be found guilty, then it’s just as much as a show trial as anything concocted by the Soviets. So, which is it Mr. president of the world? Do we say our CIA and military can’t do their job, or do we know they are guilty but have a show trial just to make your base feel good?
    Either way, I feel this is a fucking terrible way to do this thing. It’s going to publicly make the US either look like a bunch of jackasses, frauds or kangaroo court perpetrators.

    This was never about justice, this was about apearing to be strong on terrorism in the wake of Ft. Hood. Things are not boading well for the dems at this perticular junction, and Dear Leader needs something to help slow down the revolution. By sending these animals to trial the dems hope to take peoples minds off the fact that its because of Liberal PC and theology that so many people have did do to the religion of Piss.

    wyseguy says:
    November 13, 2009 at 3:00 pm
    Reply | Quote
    We may not have known much about Obama before his coronation, but we did know that the DNC and the left in this country has long since been sold on the fact that the War on Terrorism should be a matter dealt with by the Department of (in)Justice rather than the Department of Defense. This shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone. If you voted for Obama and this move surprises or shocks you, then you are unfit to ever cast a vote in this country again.

    Amen.

    Got kinda tired and need to go to bed. Didnt get to read all comments so if i said something that has already been said on the second page…apologies.

  5. 55
    LC FreedomFighter says:

    Just noticed some grammatical errors on my last post. Sorry, shit happends.

  6. 56
    LC Xystus says:

    I’ve heard that, if these hirabis are acquitted, there are other charges ready to bring up.

  7. 57
    Terrapod says:

    Pantywaist in chief, that metrosexual Chicago thug, is simply paying back his homies on the far left. KSM has confessed, there is no reason whatsoever for a trial, unless you want to use it to put the “Bush terrorosts” on trial and let out a whole mess of secrets for the NY times to try and revive it’s circulation. Bad for the U.S. and worse for our intelligence community, but then that is his objective, ain’t it? Rush summarized this pretty clearly yesterday and say what you want of the guy, he is a keen political observer. If these POS are aquitted, that will guarantee the Donks are out of power for years, so maybe it has a silver lining. Even NY liberals are not that dumb, are they?

  8. 58
    jdog43 says:

    Sorry guys, according the the US Constitution we are not at war. Now if that jerk in the Executive Mansion wants to impress me, he can request a declaration of war from congress against the enemy. Fat chance. :em99:

  9. 59

    :em98: It is beyond me, right at the moment, to express myself in a coherent manner as to how I feel about this. This entire nation has gone to absolute shit, and the largest lump of it is stirring the pot.

    It is time for a renewal of the original intent of the Founding Fathers, and a return to the greatness that once epitomized this society. This will not happen without great trauma.

    It COULD be done, quickly and cleanly, if only those in the proper positions would REMEMBER THEIR OATH!

  10. 60
    Cricket says:

    The Geneva convention does not cover those who do not wear a uniform, but who ARE enemy combatants.

  11. 61
    Cricket says:

    It also doesn’t cover those who use women and children as shields. Of course, the Consigliori is the one to consult here, but I think I am correct. Not only that, the countries who are NOT signatories of the Geneva Accords are the homes of KSM and his ilk. Ergo, they are NOT covered anyway.

  12. 62
    B. De La Paz says:

    I can’t even wrap my head around the idiocy of this all. We allow ourselves to get mired in the legal, technical arguments of whether civilian trials or military tribunals are the “appropriate” forum, and in our ADHD way, let our short attention span allow us to ignore the pattern. Let’s examine a few little evetns as of late, shall we?
    Our wonderful “gub’mint” is providing full due process and constitutional rights to terrorists who have admitted to attacking our nation and fellow citizens. The same people want us to “not jump to conclusions” with regard to Nidal Malik Hassan, the islamofacist murderer of U.S. Troops. The same cohort then crafts a bill, that they intend to become the law of the land that will throw normal, law abiding United States Citizens in jail and fine them for failing to purchase health insurance. Who the hell are these people working for anyhow?
    Are we to have true justice sacrificed on the altar of political correctness and “international opinion” while WE, THE PEOPLE are screwed by our legislators and placed at greater risk by this administration? I can’t imagine a single reason NOT to be in open revolt against this piece of crap, damaging the nation for the sake of personal self-image and political-agenda administration.
    As these progressive, socialist idiots try to tear down the nation that I spent a career defending, people argue over every little jot and tittle of legal niceties. That’s the distraction folks…pay attention, be outraged, and tell your elected SERVANTS that if they don’t shape up we’re firing them all!!!

  13. 63
    Sentry says:

    In regards to Cricket’s comment @ :

    Actually, the Geneva Conventions (there was more than one) do specifically mention how enemy combatants who are out of uniform are to be treated. I suppose a nice fair, open trial might be a pleasant prelude to their executions.

    Looking on the bright side, at least they’re not being tried in Detroit.

  14. 64
    Coldtype says:

    “Never mind that they already said they’re guilty”-E-Man

    … under torture.

    “TRANSLATION: The U.S. military is eeeeevil and would never give those “poor little brown people” a fair shake…”-E-Man

    What could possibly be “unfair” about detainees being held by the US military at Gitmo and elsewhere indefinitely without trial?

    “We were much better off treating acts of terrorism as a civilian matter. After all, it’s not like they’re going to do something like hijack planes and fly them into buildings… oh… wait, never mind”-E-Man

    Terrorism? Oh, you mean like blowing up wedding parties of 60 or more via remote controlled drones? Or how about this, launching wars of aggression against resource-rich territories for the benefit of western multinational corporations and the Wall Street mandarins?

    So if you would be kind enough to clear up a bit of confusion on my part I’d greatly appreciate it. Are you referring to major acts of terrorism by the US (i.e wars of aggression, subversion of democratic processes via assassinations, etc) or am I to understand that “terrorism” is to be defined as those acts committed by weaker parties in response to far worse atrocities committed in pursuit of the imperial ambitions of our elites?

  15. 65
    Coldtype says:

    “That would be hard to argue with a straight face on account of the fact that, last we checked, we weren’t at war with our own government. Oh, it sure as Hell feels like we are, more and more with every passing day, but such a war hasn’t actually started yet.

    Should it start, however, then I have no problem whatsoever imagining that the current assministration would waste not a second in suspending our Constitutional protections as citizens of the United States. After all, those are the same petty tyrant wannabes who want to throw American citizens in jail for five years for refusing to buy government PelosiCare.”-EM

    It’s always a source of amusement for me when the Right starts huffing and puffing about the loss of Constitutional protections while completely ignoring the fact that this horse left the barn under the auspices of the Patriot Acts I & II, the Military Commissions Act of 2006, and the (retroactively) ratified right of the State to conduct warrant-less wiretaps of American citizens. What exactly did you miss about the Jose Padilla Example? Here an American citizen was snatched off an international flight, detained without council, tortured to the point of insanity, has never faced his accusers, and will likely be detained indefinitely without trial.

    They say a slave has truly been trained to his condition when he can no longer recognize his chains.

  16. 66
    Cricket says:

    I am going out on a limb here; I actually agree with what DJ says, but must also point out that if we allow them to manipulate the system so they can ‘rule’ with their barbarism, we deserve what we get. They mock us for our weakness (in their minds) for being a nation of laws and not of tribes, and they mock us when we do not adhere to those principles because appeasement is not and has not ever been the answer.

    So, I say we don’t really care what they think, and we send them back to Gitmo and tell them in all honesty they would not get a fair trial in New York.

  17. 67
    Cricket says:

    Next, DJ, our constitutional freedoms went away with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the Emegency War Powers Act of 1933.

    Nice try.

  18. 68

    The Jihadis are simply following Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals:

    ‘Make the other side live up to their principles’ … blah blah blah

    Here’s a clue, those of you on the screaming Left and to those Jihadis with whom they’re fellow travelers ..

    Some of us on the Right side will do what it takes to win.

    Whatever. It. Takes.

  19. 69

    Emperor Misha I sez:

    My head hurts.

    mine too, but I don’t want to lie down…because every time I close my eyes I see white flags.

  20. 70
    Cricket says:

    Jaybear says exactly what I am thinking. I think you are both correct, but Jaybear has the right of it in how it needs to be handled. Jefferson didn’t get respect from the Barbary Pirates until he read the Koran and used their rules against them. We stopped paying tribute. Period. I hear Jefferson spinning in his grave.

  21. 71
    Princess Natasha, Decadent Delicious Deviant says:

    Coldtype sez:

    They say a slave has truly been trained to his condition when he can no longer recognize his chains.

    Says a despicable bureaucrat-slave, who is, of course, aspiring to hold the whip, someday. The horse left the fucking barn when the State overstepped its legitimate functions: those of defense, police and courts. So, fuck off with your bullshit, you rotten parasite.

  22. 72
    Barth Dacron says:

    I’d like to respectfully ask my fellow Rotties to refrain from the use of words like “nigger”.

    It’s uncalled for, and extremely undignified.

    And it makes the rest of us look like complete assholes by association.

    Thanks in advance!

  23. 73
    DarthBane says:

    Actually if your goal is to put the Bush Administration on trial, this is brilliant.

  24. 74
    DarthBane says:

    These guys are what the Geneva Conventions refer to as ‘unlawful combatants’.

    Actually read the Geneva Conventions about what can be done with ‘unlawful combatants’ and get back to us, DJ.

  25. 75
    Barth Dacron says:

    DarthBane sez:

    Actually if your goal is to put the Bush Administration on trial, this is brilliant.

    And, believe you me, that IS their goal.

    Don’t ever forget that the majority of O-bots are still fighting the 2000 election battle…and if they can stick it to Bush even after he’s dead, they’ll call it victory.

  26. 76
    Elephant Man says:

    Terrorism? Oh, you mean like blowing up wedding parties of 60 or more via remote controlled drones? Or how about this, launching wars of aggression against resource-rich territories for the benefit of western multinational corporations and the Wall Street mandarins?

    Funny how virtually every attack by predator drones is claimed to be against “wedding parties of 60 or more”.

    Even funnier that the bride (and everbody else) always has a beard and is carrying an AK-47 or RPG .

    Or how about this?

    Why do leftist moonbats always characterize an attack against brutal dictators and terrorists as “wars of aggression against resource-rich territories for the benefit of western multinational corporations and the Wall Street mandarins?”

    A probable explanation is that they’re getting so desperately lonely lurking in their parent’s basements that they’re posting that idiotic pap in a pathetic attempt to get laid by a “code-pinker”…. :em99:

  27. 77
    VonZorch Imperial Researcher says:

    LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech sez:

    Wow. It is somehow ‘un-American’ to follow our system of laws? Is our system of laws so flawed that you would adopt the same type of ‘justice’ you might find in the former Soviet Union?

    By changing jurisdiction of POW’s captured conducting war against the US to the US Courts, the law is being usurped.
    By changing definitions the o’bots are shoring up their influence
    There has been nothing “adopted” yet: they would have been held until an armistice happens, or their side is pacified for good, or until allah greets them in history’s cesspool.
    Even then, if they can’t fool enough shrinks into thinking they’re benign, they stay.
    This is just a not so covert rezidential power grab. Thassall.

    Cheapshot, what the hell are you on?. By the Laws of Land Warfare these assholes are unlawful combatants and as such not afforded the protections given to a Prisoner of War. Just take em out and beat them to death with a ham bone, or even better sew them snugly into a fresh pigskin and hang them in the sun to dry. Using pork in their execution denies them entry to Paradise.

  28. 78
    VonZorch Imperial Researcher says:

    Terrapod sez:

    Even NY liberals are not that dumb, are they?

    Dude, nobody ever won money betting against liberal stupidity

  29. 79
    Cricket says:

    According to Coldtype:

    “They say a slave has truly been trained to his condition when he can no longer recognize his chains.”

    True enough when you are talking about liberals. I guess you and those of your ilk on the Left haven’t brainwashed us enough yet.

    And what freedom does the Obamanation offer us? Slaves to the state; secret police, etc. Anyone read the more egregious parts of the health care bill? Punitive fines?

  30. 80

    Notice if you will, the lefty screamers don’t actually present … factual, logical arguments to counter the fact that under Geneva, the ‘enemy combatants’ (I prefer to call them partisans) have zero rights? And they immediately revert to the racism comments ..

    I am … shocked, I say .. shocked!

  31. 81
    LC Old Dog says:

    To the Islamic Imperialists I can only say that in every situation, They Shot First!

    To the Left Wing Liberals, Read the damn Constitution!

    Apply the Rule of Reason to the two situations!

    Then project an argument based on reason verses emotion! When you can do that, talk to me!

    :em04:

  32. 82
    LC hilljohnny says:

    the only good thing in finding the terrorists have protection under our constitution is that by logical extension everyone is covered by it. this means the Brits have 2A rights as well and we should all start smuggling guns to them.

  33. 83
    LC Xystus says:

    DJA, ITW:

    We are a nation of laws.

    Nope. Once again I suspect someone’s misremembering “A government of laws,& not of men.”

  34. 84
    LC TerribleTroy, Imperial Centurion says:

    Im going to weigh in with Baco on this one…

    Please leave all the racisist innuendo and derogatory terms at the door. Doesnt matter if you’re being snarky or whatever. Its just nonsense… if you dont like the cultural attributes of a group.. say so and why. The left would love to make this about race… thats how they got elected…. Im not for giving them anything.

    DOG concurs… and says the worst thing you can call someone is a Socialist

    Oh… (before I forget)…Muzzy (the ignorant slut) is a RAAAAAACIST :em01: Apologize all you want Muzzy… the simple fact is that in your heart you feel that its ok to refer to Japenese as “Japs”. Liberal hypocrisy at its finest…. :em01:

    WHAT. A. FUCKING. DOUCHEBAG.

  35. 85
    fxpcpa says:

    I find it indescribably amusing when crypto-socialists like the imperial tech wiz start on us about being a “nation of laws”. Really, rotflmao! This while his fellow traveler’s violate the supreme law of the land on an almost hourly basis. All of a sudden these paragons of freedom and liberty have a new found reverence for a document that they find an impediment to them implementing their superior, enlightened form of “social justice”(read: screw whitey). These are the same people who supported the (the Obama Administration and his running dog lackey press) overt curtailment of the rule of law in Honduras by siding with the worst despots in the hemispere.

    Also why is it these people call it imperialism when we exercise our right to self defense but the rule of law when they want to apply american juris prudence arbitratily into parts of the world(like Honduras) where we have no right. Walks, talks and quacks doesn’t it. And then they only apply that doctrine when it suits their rhetorical/idealogical agenda or if it undermines an ally.

    Of course their reverence is selective just like their outrage. They require us to be perfect (in their interpretation) in the application of our ideals(again their interpretation of what our ideals are) while never living up to theirs. Keep in mind kids there is nothing more inequitable than the practical application of socialist dogma. Equality being one of the primary tenent of their faith. These are the same people who unabashedly want to silence the political right by instituting a new (un)fainess doctrine never acknowledging they get their spin out un-edited in 95% of the media as it is constututed now. And the other 5%(like this site) still gives you their view except with commentary.

    Like was mentioned before in this thread, this is a way to try Bush instead of the actual barbarians. They need to retroactively declare our actions illegal so they have a way to capitulate, by making our actions illegitimate, to the world socialist order into which they yearn to integrate us. It doesn’t matter that the previous administration took great pains to act within the parameter’s of the constitution while his political enemies tried to criminalize good faith differences in policy. This is what the socialist strategy has been since Lenin. Oh and before you call me a Bush lackey I only voted for him once and then only because my only other choices were an unapologetic traitor(kerry) and a complete unrepentant socialist(Nader)

    At no point in the history of western civilisation, until the hypocrites on the political left, has it been required for a nation to extend the protections of their legal systems to those who would subvert or supplant it. These jihadis obviously don’t believe in our conception of the rule of law, they only mouth the words in order to stir up our own fifth columnists, who also don’t believe in our system and believe in the rule of the enlightened annointed few. And where did these barbarians get these ideas, probably the same place the Empty Suit-in -Chief got them. By the way the extension of these rights is neither prudent nor enlightened it is suicide. Remember the constitution is not a suicide pact. Don’t take interpretations of the Constitution from those who wish to subvert it by semantics.

    These are the same useful idiots who thought the Soviet Union was peachy keen; until it failed and they had to re-write history to show they were on our side all along. These are the same people who think Mao was just a misunderstood overachiever. And that Cuba has unparralleled(in a good way) healthcare. Of course they get that info from directly from Castro and we all know just what a credible source he is. Just as an aside have you ever noticed that liberal/socialist will accept statistics from any government unquestioningly unless it is run by the rethuglicans or it is Israeli. Just saying. This is probably why they have such tolerance for Islam. A totally authoritrian form of governance totally exempt from criticism because it masquerades as a reilgion. An ideology that lies it’s ass off to extend its influence and has doctrines to excuse those lies as long as their agenda is implemented. Taqqiyah is arabic for any “any lie for the cause”.

    Sorry for the rambling citizens but let me address one or two more points of abject assininity as espoused by the esteemed imperial tech wiz. That is the idea that our response creates more problems than it solves. That’s true only to the extent that we leave any of these animals alive to nurse a grievance. The idea that we have used brute force to eliminate these slugs is risible. You how I know, they’re still out there bitching and moaning. Dirty Harry said it best” you can tell I didn”t do that to him, he looks to damn good.”

    Then the esteemed ITW trots out the tired old meme that because we wipe out terrorists in the midst of “innocent” civilians at some al-quaeda bake sale that we are no better than the terrorist. How un-nuanced of his superior arroganceness. The people who attend these functions or live in these neighborhoods know who the bad guys are and they tolerate their presence there or actively support them by attending these pseudo-social functions/ war councils. They knew the job was dangerous when they took it(bak, bak,bak,bak) The fact that the ITW can’t tell the difference between targeting civilians no where near a military facility as the primary target and those who either condone or overtly support the perpetrators and materiel of war in their midst gives rise to the fallacy that he some how has his intellectual ducks in a row. It is a dangerous moral equivalency that pervades the so-called thinking of the political left. Tell me esteemed ITW would you permit the Marines to set up an FOB in your backyard, a facility that would legitimately draw enemy fire.

    If a bunch of gangbangers set up shop in your neighborhood would you want the cops to ignore them for fear that they might piss them off?

    Why is it only our enemy is inculcated with terrible resolve when they get their ass kicked and if we get smashed we should lie down like sheep for fear of making them madder. Double standards are twice as good I guess. I have news for you, Islam has been the aggressor from it’ s inception. They were born mad. Maybe we should make it so they fear making us mad.

    I guess if we tried your method in WWII we wouldn’t have a mid-east problem today. All the jews would be dead making Israel a moot point ’cause it wouldn’t exist.

    What would the ITW have us do; reason with the unreasonable. I think the premise of submit or die is more or less non-negotiable from their end.

    Thank you my liege for this forum. Sorry for any breach of protocol and the KD(keyboard diarhea).

  36. 86

    Like I said Deej,

    Also, these people are NOT considered to be POWs.

    It’s just tinkerin’ with the definitions,, hamstringing our ability to deal with their strategies.
    We’ve elected an alien in chief that has no intention of passing up a perfectly good non-crisis to advance his ability to control things he has no right to.

  37. 87

    I know this VZorch, very well,

    Cheapshot, what the hell are you on?. By the Laws of Land Warfare these assholes are unlawful combatants and as such not afforded the protections given to a Prisoner of War. Just take em out and beat them to death with a ham bone, or even better sew them snugly into a fresh pigskin and hang them in the sun to dry. Using pork in their execution denies them entry to Paradise.
    Reality,, it’s got a fantastic kick.

    and that’s why I think that if they don’t even rise to the definition of POW’s (which I used improperly before), giving them access our uniformed enemies don’t get to our courts is an even BIGGER travesty. a power grab by the admin.
    Did I address your point?

    And NEVER ask me what I’m on ‘less ya want a glass of it.
    ‘Easier to try it than ‘splane it.

  38. 88
    LC Ted says:

    If the slime balls are actually acquitted, it will either result in

    a. The start of the decent into sharia law or

    b. the end of liberalism & the democratic party

    I hope its b.

    Ted

  39. 89
    Princess Natasha, Decadent Delicious Deviant says:

    LC Ted sez:

    If the slime balls are actually acquitted, it will either result in
    a. The start of the decent into sharia law or
    b. the end of liberalism & the democratic party
    I hope its b.
    Ted

    I opt for c: a normal human being or several whack these sons of pigs and deposit their heads on the steps of the Whorehouse.

  40. 90

    The possible results, presentence, appeals,ad hohum,,are nauseating and incredibly expensive for US,,but the real damage would come from the bully pulpit we give the enemy.

  41. 91
    Princess Natasha, Decadent Delicious Deviant says:

    fxpcpa sez:

    can’t tell the difference between targeting civilians no where near a military facility as the primary target and those who either condone or overtly support the perpetrators and materiel of war in their midst gives rise to the fallacy that he some how has his intellectual ducks in a row. It is a dangerous moral equivalency that pervades the so-called thinking of the political left.

    And this is where liberals forget what is taught in any basic ethics class. You see, even if these civilians are NOT supporters of the bad guys, they can be viewed as hostages (“human shields”, anyone?). In a hostage situation the responsibility for the deaths or injuries of hostages lies solely on the hostage-takers. No nuance, no gray areas, no “shared guilt”. Hajmo splodeymonkeys hide among civilians, civilians die as a result, it is the fault of the said hajmo splodeymonkeys. Too easy, so simple.

    Holy crap, leftards are bigger guilt-mongers than some Catholics I know!

  42. 92

    In a hostage situation the responsibility for the deaths or injuries of hostages lies solely on the hostage-takers.

    ‘Growin’ old here waiting for the msm to blame them for anyfreakin’ thing.
    ‘Don’t see ‘taliban’ and ‘war crimes’ in the same sentence anywhere.
    Perhaps we should rearrange our designations to juxtapose theirs,,

    Naw,, we got a good system, just a buncha libs tryin’ to fly it.

    Starbuck (to busted up cylon he was tinkering on) “How did you get here?”

    Cylon “We were taking a vote on emergency action when the planet came up and struck us”.

  43. 93

    In regards to B. De La Paz’s comment @ 67: Excellent catch.
    In regards to Emperor Misha I’s comment @ 70: Brilliant dissection, expected no less Sire.
    In regards to Coldtype’s comment 71 & 72@ : Shut the fuck up you terrorist sympathizing communist pig dropping.
    In regards to Cricket’s comment @ 73 & 74: Exactly.
    In regards to DarthBane’s comment @ 82: Another exactly.
    In regards to Elephant Man’s comment @ 84: And yet another.
    In regards to VonZorch Imperial Researcher’s comment @ 85: Very nice. Thank you for linking those.
    In regards to fxpcpa’s comment @ 93: Personally? I enjoyed that bout of KD. Superb rant of a comment. Well said.
    In regards to LC Ted’s comment @ 96: Total agreement, b is the preferred option. Does anyone have any idea how many pissed off AMERICANS there would be?
    Princess Natasha, Decadent Delicious Deviant sez:

    And this is where liberals forget what is taught in any basic ethics class. You see, even if these civilians are NOT supporters of the bad guys, they can be viewed as hostages (”human shields”, anyone?). In a hostage situation the responsibility for the deaths or injuries of hostages lies solely on the hostage-takers. No nuance, no gray areas, no “shared guilt”. Hajmo splodeymonkeys hide among civilians, civilians die as a result, it is the fault of the said hajmo splodeymonkeys. Too easy, so simple.

    Perfect N@, perfect.
    Ah, fuck it, it’s bedtime. Night all.

  44. 94

    I couldn’t make it past the kitchen on the way to bed, fuming and frothing a bit. I’ve got an addendum to that execution of muslim prisoners concept. We do a fast motion video of the slaughter of that herd of pigs, and all the guts being conveyor belted into a long deep pit. Then we line up the “priiiisoners” by that pit before we shoot them and kick them over the edge into it. The rest remains the same.

    What the FUCK is wrong with you “civilized” people? The only thing these savages understand is strength, and fear. The ONLY way they will back the fuck off is to brook no bullshit, and show them that They. Do. Not. Want. To. Fuck. With. US! We will be more than they can stand to have nightmares about. THAT is the only way we will win against these stone age tribal creatures.

  45. 95

    In regards to LC cmblake6, Imperial Black Ops Technician’s comment @ :

    Agreed.

    You have to teach these people that the price of their Jihad will be so horrible, on both an individual and a public level, will be so horrible, that they won’t even consider it. That’s the way you bring this war to a close.

    My scenario: One 450 KT burst at altitude, high enough to where it can be seen without doing any actual damagen .. with a politely worded note that says ‘Next one goes off at ground level if you continue. Take youir pick.’

  46. 96

    In regards to LC Sir Intellectual Conservative 5th Columnist’s comment @ 108: Not bad, but it still allows them admission to Paradise as “martyrs of jihad”. No, it has to be grotesque. Absolutely dna implanted memory of the sheerest terror. That is the only thing that will work. I hate it, but it’s truth.

  47. 97
    Princess Natasha, Decadent Delicious Deviant says:

    Elephant Man sez:

    Even funnier that the bride (and everbody else) always has a beard and is carrying an AK-47 or RPG .

    Well, E-man, that just proves how much more progressive they are than we American brutes! They already adopted gay marriage!!

    And please, don’t waste your time on the despicable piece of trash “coldtype”. That creature is vile, stupid and worthy of nothing but utter contempt. The death of such a repugnant life form (of natural causes, of course) would be a blessing to all actual human beings.

  48. 98
    Princess Natasha, Decadent Delicious Deviant says:

    E-man, I offered that panty-wearing ratfuck coldtype to buy him a ticket to a turd-world pisslamic or communist shit-hole of his choice. He never took up the offer. So, along with being a whiny pissant ass-licker of terrorists, he is also a hypocrite, a liar and a chickenshit coward. He should get a job in a bath-house that caters to future hajmo splodeydopes. He can help them shave their minuscule shrivelled nutsacks as well as be their “practice-virgin”.

  49. 99

    Coldtype showed even less brains than usual when it said we spend 2.5 trillion a year on Defense.

    Havent seen it around here a lot since it got called out on that one.

    Kinda reminds me of this uberidiot I was debating once on Take Back The Media (far left blog) …. it basically said first that the tsunami that hit a few years ago in the Indian Ocean had been caused by US forces literally ’50 miles away in Diego Garcia’, and that it was designed to level everything so we could move in and take over. When I pointed out that the IO tsunami was … a couple of time zones away from Diego Garcia and that no US forces even were near the disaster site until after the disaster happened and we were providing relief, the troll went .. suitably insane. I guess my saying ‘A world map is your friend’ didnt help matters 🙂

  50. 100
    Princess Natasha, Decadent Delicious Deviant says:

    LC Sir Intellectual Conservative 5th Columnist sez:

    Coldtype showed even less brains than usual when it said we spend 2.5 trillion a year on Defense.

    What do you expect from Ward Churchill’s cock ornament? :em72:

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.