Liberals Finally Find Something Other than Terrorists to Defend

This time, surprise surprise, they’re rallying to the defense of a child rapist. Note, if you please, that the writer is a “feminist”, which continues a long pattern among “feminists.” As soon as the allegations of rape or harassment are against somebody they like, they can’t drop their panties quick enough and promptly forget every single word they’ve ever said on the issue.

Puffington Host writer Joan Shore has finally had it with the Swiss for arresting a fugitive child rapist. How dare they? What is their problem???

The judge in the 1977 statutory rape case is dead.

We’ll comment in depth on that remarkable statement once we figure out just what, exactly, that has to do with the validity of the charges against kiddy diddler Roman Polanski and the fact that he drugged, raped and sodomized a 13-year-old girl in spite of her repeated protests. (If you can stomach it, here’s the transcript of the girl’s testimony, h/t Patterico).

Polanski had agreed at the time to a plea bargain, but then the judge reneged on it. Polanski has tried to appeal.

The plea bargain being that he admitted to statutory rape in order to escape charges of rape and sodomy. And no, the judge didn’t renege on it. What happened was that the judge wanted desperately to let the child rapist off with a slap on the wrist, so he wrote a screenplay with lines for both the prosecution and the defense that they were to follow, after which he’d come in and issue a “fair” slap on the wrist. When the prosecution tattled on this “clever” little scheme, it started to look like the judge, having been caught with his pants down (but hopefully not with his ejaculating dick buried in the anus of a 13-year-old like his protegee, Roman Polanski), might not be able to pull it off, so Polanski ran away.

But there is more to this story. The 13-year old model “seduced” by Polanski had been thrust onto him by her mother, who wanted her in the movies.

“Seduced” is an interesting choice of words for dropping quaaludes in a child’s drink and then, in spite of repeated protestations, proceeding to molest her. And what’s with the “thrust onto him by her mother” bit? Are you trying, you purulently discharging sow, to suggest that her mother wanted her child to be raped by a middle-aged pervert? Or are you “merely” saying that letting your kid hang out with a director in hopes that she might land a career in the movies as a result is a carte blanche for said director to do as he pleases with her?

I may be going out on a limb here, you diseased, perverted skanky bitch, but somehow I don’t think that “I want my kid to have a career in the movies” is the same as saying “I want my baby daughter to have Roman Polanski’s cock ejaculating in her colon.”

Besides, doesn’t the kid get a say in the matter? Obviously not, in Joan Shore’s pedophile fantasies.

The girl was just a few weeks short of her 14th birthday, which was the age of consent in California. (It’s probably 13 by now!)

No. The age of consent in California at the time was 18, and had been since 1913. But hey, keep pulling “facts” out of your ample arse. (Did Roman Polanski unload in there too?)

Not that it matters, really, since you yourself mention the word “consent”, which your syphilitic mind obviously doesn’t have the faintest grasp on the meaning of. When Roman Polanski told her to take her clothes off, she said “no.” When he started fondling her, she said “no.” When he kissed her, she said “no.” When he went down on her, she said “no.” When he raped her, she said “no” and when he proceeded to sodomize her, she said “no” again.

Didn’t “feminists” use to say, over and over again, that “no means NO!” Obviously it doesn’t mean that when it’s being uttered by children about to be raped by Roman Polanski. If that’s the case, then “no” means “consent”, according to “feminists” and just about any pedophile rapist who ever polluted our planet.

Polanski was demonized by the press,

Can’t have been all that hard, considering he’d just drugged and repeatedly raped a 13-year-old child. OK, in California perhaps, but we’re talking about the sane part of the world.

convicted, and managed to flee, fearing a heavy sentence.

What could possibly have made him fear that?

And Joan Shore isn’t the only liberal outraged that a child rapist might be punished for his disgusting crime. Filmmakers and other perverts everywhere are signing a petition to let poor Roman go.

Most are European and unfamiliar, but among the people whose movies I’ll never watch again: Jonathan Demme, John Landis, Michael Mann, Martin Scorsese, and, bless his heart, Woody Allen, who I guess was forced to sign lest the press seize on the idea of a guy who married his almost-stepdaughter passing judgment on Polanski. Open question to any of these rape-defending turds: How far would you have let Polanski go before deciding that, hey, he probably should serve some time after all? What if he punched the kid in the face when he was raping her? Beat her with a tire iron? Seriously, how far?

That’s easy to answer: If he’d ever voted Republican. Or maybe if he’d waterboarded her? Yeah, that’s it. If only she’d been a muslim terrorist instead of an innocent, frightened child. The liberals would be screaming for his bloody head now.

By their friends shall you know them…

Thatisall.

51 comments

  1. 1

    Rope. Tree. Pervert. Vat of acid. Gravity. Some assembly required.

    Oh .. and first!

  2. 2
    LC Wunderlampe says:

    I’m reminded of what Victor Klemperer wrote in his diaries, in 1940: that, given supreme power of Germany that instant, he would pardon all the regular Germans, and even quite a bit of the Nazi Party – but he’d hang every intellectual in the coutnry, and the professors three feet higher than the rest out of grounds of public hygene.

    I get that there are monsters in the world, and in a wierd way, that isn’t too bothering. They’re evil, they need to be brought down, end of discussion. It’s the little maggots who act as apologists and special pleaders for them that I cannot stand.

  3. 3
    LC SleepTech:Resident Racial(ist?) Mutt says:

    LC Sir Intellectual Conservative 5th Columnist sez:

    Rope. Tree. Pervert. Vat of acid. Gravity. Some assembly required.
    Oh .. and first!

    I’ll better, or worsen, that…

    Flayed alive, Salt and Turpentine forcefully ‘rubbed’ into every square millimeter of exposed muscle tissue, emasculated, bleeding stopped by red hot iron cauterization, said emasculated parts shoved down his throat untill swallowed, cained for three days, drawn and quarterred.
    All televised LIVE!! :em96: :em96: :em96:

    I have NO pitty for a true child molester.

  4. 4
    LOBO says:

    OT but really Fucked Up, the Empire State buliding is lit up in Red and Yellow to honor commie Chinas 60TH. When the fuck have we ever celebrated a commie takeover?? Links I cannot provide, for some reason I get a malformed URL when I try to do them.?????

  5. 5
  6. 6

    Perhaps rape isn’t that big a thang for huffpo’ joan.
    I know that there’s some wimmen out there that dream of the day.

  7. 7
    Bruce in NH says:

    Come on, it’s not like he showed up in public wearing a jacket with a snowmobile manufacturer’s logo on it.

  8. 8
    Cricket says:

    Misha,
    You have touched on something here that strikes at the heart of the debate: The double standard of the Left. Feminists should be rejoicing that the Swiss police arrested the pervert and that the woman he molested as a child will get some justice. I honestly do no understand the lack of consistency; the mantra of ‘hasn’t he suffered enough’ rings false. He made the choice to rape this child; the fact that he had to use drugs and alcohol to do it speaks volumes; the fact that she said no and resisted is also significant. When we protect the perps and not the victims, we do our society an injustice; we say that ‘we have standards’ but we don’t know what they are when they keep shifting in favor of those who flagrantly break the laws of G-d (raping a virgin) and society (statutory rape). I am from California; the age of consent has been 18 for as long as I can remember; 14 is for legal marriage with parental consent, and I haven’t heard of 14 being the legal age for marriage in that state…EVER.

    The idiot who is defending Polanski is truly breath taking in her lack of compassion and logic. So what if she was going to be 14 in a couple of weeks. 14 is still statutory rape.

    Excellent post.

  9. 9
    Princess Natasha, Decadent Delicious Deviant says:

    I have long suspected that the most dear, the most secret and cherished fantasy of a feminazi is to be brutally ass-raped by some freak. The bitches fantasize about it. Too bad for them, they’re so ugly and nasty, no freak will ever want to rape them. This cunt writing for PuffHo is no exception. For someone supposedly being “pro-women”, these bitches are sure OK with women being treated like shit. :em38:

  10. 10
    Cricket says:

    Well said, Natasha. During the Reign of Error that was known as the Clinton Administration, Paula Jones and others who had been attacked by the then governor of Arkansas who was now the POTUS were thrown under the bus by NOW (or as Rush used to call them, the NAGs) gang. For an administration that was supposed to be ethical, blah blah blah..consistent, blah blah blah…they had a lot of covering up to do. The lone exception was Gennifer Flowers; she was Clinton’s mistress. She was an adult, made the choice and was not raped or forced into a liaison, or no attempts were made in that regard.

  11. 11

    Speaking of interesting chew toys, only slightly OT, would someone else care to deal with an Alinskyite I’ve got at mine? My blood pressure is holding, but some more specific assistance would be appreciated here.

  12. 12
    SeniorD says:

    Let’s see, on one hand, we have a young woman who was kidnapped, held hostage and continually forced into intercourse with her kidnapper. She downloads for this piece of filth two children who wonder why ‘Daddy’ can’t see them any longer. The outrage against the abhorrent kidnapper and his common-law ‘wife’ provide the sort of plot lines a ‘Made for TV’ movie thrives upon.

    On the hand, we have an older woman, who lost her virtue at the hands of another piece of filth now supported by the intellectually lazy Holyweird crowd. This woman’s one experience results in her continued living with the memory of a ‘famous’ movie director foisting Quaaludes and champagne upon her and then brutalizing her in ways Radical Islam could only dream of is also the stuff of movie plots.

    Both women endured life changing examples of man’s inhumanity to woman. Yet one man will go to prison, hopefully for the rest of his life while the other has yet to be tried. Both should be made to endure the sort of humiliation they foisted upon those young women. Both should be places in the general prison population where a certain type of ‘justice’ prevails.

    As the old Western movies used to say ‘Hangin’s too good for ’em!’

  13. 13
    Cheryl says:

    Ah, yes. The feminazis! :em02: :em04: :em72:

    They scream for rapists to be castrated, but if it’s an absolutely creepy pedophile degenerate beloved of the Hollyweird elite (he won an Oscar doncha know!) well, then it’s A-OK. Rape, sodomy, humiliation of a child, whatever he wants.

    I salute the Swiss police for arresting the freak. If he is exonerated here in the US (and I think that’s what will happen) it will mean that civilization is completely broken down, which I suspect has been going on all along. The message is that no matter what atrocity you commit and if you are one of the :em72: elite :em72: and you can hang in long enough you can get away with anything.

  14. 14
    LC Don_M says:

    Cricket sez:

    I honestly do no understand the lack of consistency; the mantra of ‘hasn’t he suffered enough’ rings false.

    We hear Regressives bleat on and on about how this piece of sub-human filth survived a concentration camp, and that he lost his wife to murderous creeps. A deep and grievous insult to law-abiding survivors lurks therein. Millions of Jews and others lived long enough to be liberated from the camps, and nearly all managed to conform to the law while coping with survivor’s guilt. Additional millions have lost loved ones to violent crime, but we wouldn’t have much of a society left if most of them started expressing their grief and rage by raping and killing, would we?

    When we protect the perps and not the victims, we do our society an injustice; we say that ‘we have standards’ but we don’t know what they are when they keep shifting in favor of those who flagrantly break the laws of G-d (raping a virgin) and society (statutory rape).

    The Founders sought to establish a nation of laws, not of men. To the extent that we allow the Regressives to argue that a celebrity “artiste” or anybody else they favor is exempt from the law, we permit them to succeed in demolishing this foundational principle.

  15. 15
    LC Xealot says:

    Cheryl sez:

    The message is that no matter what atrocity you commit and if you are one of the elite and you can hang in long enough you can get away with anything.

    Contrary to typical Leftist doctrine, that’s the precise aim of Leftism. It’s not to make everyone equal in wealth, power, etc… It’s to ensure that the elite STAY the elite and that none of the Plebians invade their exclusive domain. 1984 tells us that Leftism, essentially, aims to stay in power for the sake of power alone.

    It’s no wonder Hollywood is Leftist, or that “feminists” support this degenerate piece of elephant shit. He’s one of their own kind, just with a penis. I wonder what feminists think of female teachers seducing male students… I imagine it’s okay because a woman did it, right?

  16. 16
    Dragineez says:

    Jeez! Have you read those Grand Jury Transcripts? Yes. This perv needs to be arrested, extradited, tried, and sentenced. And as far as I’m concerned, Jack Nicholson now ranks pretty high on my list of useless fucks too.

  17. 17
    Physics Geek says:

    Apparently the rank and file liberal readers at the HuffPo don’t buy into this child rape is okay if we like his movies thing. They are almost uniformly outraged by the writer’s stance.

  18. 18

    In regards to Physics Geek’s comment: Even HuffPo liberals can show some vestige of decency. Politically we may not agree, but many of them are decent (if misguided) human beings.

  19. 19
    LC Jennifer says:

    Castrated by a nearsighted baboon with a rusty scalpel.

  20. 20
    HoundOfDoom says:

    This is it. This is the line that shall not be crossed.

    Molesting kids. That’s it. Over. Done. Fail. Out.

    Anyone expressing support for this pervert is out of my house and out of my life. Run before I toss you.

    No kidding.

    And don’t ever, EVER come near my wife, my kid, my dog.

    Or you’ll get hurt. No, I don’t care about jail. Not anymore. Not at this level.

    Count yourself lucky that it’s 2009, and not 1959. Even 50 years ago, you would have been dealt with.

    Now? Now you are lucky. Don’t press your luck.

  21. 21
    ebrown2 says:

    Looks like you won’t have to give up watching THE FIFTH ELEMENT:

    “The French director Luc Besson refused to sign the petition calling for Polanski’s release.

    He said: ‘I have a lot of affection for him, he is a man that I like very much but nobody should be above the law. I don’t know the details of this case, but I think that when you don’t show up for trial, you are taking a risk.’ ”

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/roman-polanski/6245219/Roman-Polanski-backlash-as-Whoopi-Goldberg-says-director-didnt-commit-rape-rape.html

  22. 22
    AyUaxe says:

    Polanski is a shit-stain on this country and his heritage. I’d forgotten the details of his crime and his legal wheeling and dealing, but I’ve read that he already pled guilty in a plea bargain that would have him seeing minimal jail time, despite the brutality of his crime (which I won’t describe here–transcripts of testimony are out there–had the vic been my child, Polanski would have been glad when I let the hogs have him).

    So, bottom line, he’s got time to serve under his plea, he’s got additional time to serve for being a fugitive and for contempt. Every MFer who’s signing a petition or yammering in any media for a declination to prosecute should be charged with and prosecuted as an accessory after the fact and for contempt, since they are inciting violation of court orders and aiding a convicted felon and sex offender. Almost forgot about that.

    BTW, he openly cheated on Sharon Tate, one of the most beautiful and reportedly nicest women ever to have the misfortune to become a Hollyweird tragedy. Fuckhead Polanski has not one shred of decency and qualifies for not a shred of sympathy.

  23. 23
  24. 24
    Tailfin says:

    So Hoopty Goldberg adds some dazzling brilliance to the debate with “I know it wasn’t rape-rape. I think it was something else, but I don’t believe it was rape-rape.”

    Not about to be upstaged in this head-so-far-up-the-ass-I-can-see-you-through-my-bellybutton exercise, Debra Winger chimes in, calling it a “three-decades-old case that is dead but for minor technicalities. We stand by him and await his release and his next masterpiece.”

    Gee, Debbles… somehow I just can’t imagine, had it been a highly effective corporate executive who had lured your kid into a rollicking fist-fuck, that you would be all about letting bygones be bygones and await that next masterpiece of a quarterly earnings statement.

    Hollywood values. Idol worshippers. Art whores. Let them all rot in hell.

  25. 25
    Lady H says:

    Suppose it would be okay too if Polanski ass-raped your daughter too, huh, Debra Winger?

  26. 26
    Dragineez says:

    Wow. The response of the average person, regardless of political persuasion, is really turning and biting Hollyweird on the ass. NOW finally gets up and says the right thing. Long time HuffPosters are SLAMMING the sheer stupidity of the article. Any “artist” stupid enough to sign anything calling for Polansky’s release is going to have to let some time pass to live that down. Want to lay any bets that, in the future, known signatories to such a document will lie about it and say “No I didn’t!” Whoopie Goldberg catching flak from all sides over her absurd “rape-rape” comment.

    See, something both the right and the left can agree on. Raping children is bad, no get out of jail free card.

  27. 27
    sig94 says:

    Everytime I start to comment on this I gotta go calm down. For a 44 yr old man to force himself on a 13 year old child…… stuffing himself into every hole this kid possessed.

    What in the unholy blue fuck is rape rape? Does he have to use his dick dick to do it?

    Have these people lost their minds? Have any of these stupid liberal bastards ever spent time in a hospital examination room interviewing a rape victim? Have they ever gone through the photo stash – seeing pics of a pedophile stuffing himself into some kid’s mouth while the kid is struggling to get away? Sweet Lord these shitheads have no idea what this sick SOB is all about nor do they know what he did to other kids while he was in Europe. This sick bastard didn’t just do it once, that’s not how they roll. Leave me alone with this guy for two minutes with a pair of pliers….

  28. 28
    PB says:

    If we look at the crap that most of these so called artists produce, is it any surprise that they support a pedophile? I would call what they do “porn”, but at least with porn producers you know what you get. The Hollyweird “artists” produce crap ( :em72: ) that denigrate God, America, American families, children, etc… So, is it any surprise that they support a pedophile, hell they will probably have a concert for the bastard.

    I will miss the works of some of them, but I did not realize what sleaze balls they were. The others like woody allen, etal I could never stand and won’t start now.

    Polanski needs to be brought back to the US and let the prisoners in the CA system deal with him.

  29. 29
    airandee says:

    I heard Woody Allen is making a movie about this staring Wilson Phillips, McKenzie Phillips, Mia Farrow and Sonje Allen.

    This is not the first time Hollywood and Liberals looked the other way.

  30. 30
    Princess Natasha, Decadent Delicious Deviant says:

    Notice how libtards, while whining about “fairness” and “justice” always look for loopholes for themselves. “For thee but not for me”… I am surprised though that right when it happened the parents of this girl did not hunt that wanker down and chop off his diseased dick. Besides, were this Polanski asshole a conservative, or some wealthy industrialist, these same leftards would have been howling for his death right now. Fuck these degenerates. They are swine.

  31. 31
    Dragineez says:

    Not defending Whoopie mind you, but “rape-rape” means she got the ever lovin’ shit kicked out of her too. Broken nose, jaw, missing teeth, bruises all over, and a genuine miracle that she survived at all. But you knew that.

  32. 32
    LC TerribleTroy, Imperial Centurion says:

    In regards to Dragineez’s comment @ :

    Noooooooo…… I’de call that RAPE & AG BATT…………. I cant define one method of rape being more or less rapey than another …… you mean like a higher Rape….like aggravated rape. Whoopie is a fucking complete idiot who should shut her pie hole

    It’s not like it was rape,rape……..dumbest fucking thing I’ve heard in a loooooooong time

  33. 33
    Draven32 says:

    In regards to PB’s comment @ :

    The Hollyweird “artists” produce crap ( :em72: ) that denigrate God, America, American families, children, etc…

    And when they make something that *doesn’t*, the ‘critics’ complain about how horrible it is.

  34. 34
    VonZorch Imperial Researcher says:

    Nail his balls to a stump that has been soaked with something that burns slowly, like motor oil, set it on fire and give him a rusty butter knife..

    And the correct term is hebephilia, sexual interest in pubescent children. Pedophilia refers to sexual interest in pre-pubescents.

  35. 35
    Physics Geek says:

    In regards to Lady H’s comment @ :

    Well of course it would be okay, especially if Ms. Winger got to star in Polanski’s next film. Heck, her daughter might even get free tickets to the premiere.

  36. 36
    LC Getalis, Imperial Czar of Pharmacology says:

    VonZorch Imperial Researcher sez:

    Nail his balls to a stump that has been soaked with something that burns slowly, like motor oil, set it on fire and give him a rusty butter knife..

    A plastic spoon would be a tad more delicious, not to mention “worse” for the environment…

    And the correct term is hebephilia, sexual interest in pubescent children. Pedophilia refers to sexual interest in pre-pubescents.

    I thought the former was ephebophilia?

  37. 37
    Tailfin says:

    @ Deej: Credit where credit is due – I appreciate your sanity on this one. There are just some things like stomping on puppies that we all should agree are wrong. But I think YGBSM pretty much nailed it with:

    I guess the simple way to say it is this: Although most liberals are not supporters of Polanski, most of his supporters are liberal. That’s where the broad brush comes in.

    And while it is rather against my nature to advocate a second wrong to make a right, I vote for open season on bootlegs involving any of the pinhead signatories to the Polanski Defense List. If the justice system can be flouted and the rule of law cast aside when it fits your fancy, then I’ll revisit some of my fancies and they can just shut the fuck up.

  38. 38
    LC TerribleTroy, Imperial Centurion says:

    Whoah! Wait a minute here… when did stomping puppies become a bad thing? :em95:

  39. 39
    LC Subotai Bahadur says:

    In the interest of helping in the good works suggested by Tailfin in #42 above; allow me to present the most prestigious of the petitions on behalf of Roman Polanski, as referenced by His Majesty above. In this the best and brightest of the entertainment community [mostly Yurpeans, but more than a few Americans, and a lot of producers and directors for the bootleg war].

    http://www.indiewire.com/article/over_100_in_film_community_sign_polanski_petition/P0/

    and especially, here is the latest updated list of those who have signed:

    Fatih Akin
    Stephane Allagnon
    Woody Allen
    Pedro Almodovar
    Wes Anderson
    Jean-Jacques Annaud
    Alexandre Arcady
    Fanny Ardant
    Asia Argento
    Darren Aronofsky
    Olivier Assayas
    Alexander Astruc
    Gabriel Auer
    Luc Barnier
    Christophe Barratier
    Xavier Beauvois
    Liria Begeja
    Gilles Behat
    Jean-Jacques Beineix
    Marco Bellochio
    Monica Bellucci
    Djamel Bennecib
    Giuseppe Bertolucci
    Patrick Bouchitey
    Paul Boujenah
    Jacques Bral
    Patrick Braoudé
    Andre Buytaers
    Christian Carion
    Henning Carlsen
    Jean-Michel Carre
    Patrice Chereau
    Elie Chouraqui
    Souleymane Cisse
    Alain Corneau
    Jerome Cornuau
    Miguel Courtois
    Dominique Crevecoeur
    Alfonso Cuaron
    Luc et Jean-Pierre Dardenne
    Jonathan Demme
    Alexandre Desplat
    Rosalinde et Michel Deville
    Georges Dybman
    Jacques Fansten
    Joël Farges
    Gianluca Farinelli
    Jacques Fansten
    Etienne Faure
    Michel Ferry
    Scott Foundas
    Stephen Frears
    Thierry Fremaux
    Sam Gabarski
    René Gainville
    Tony Gatlif
    Costa Gavras
    Jean-Marc Ghanassia
    Terry Gilliam
    Christian Gion
    Marc Guidoni
    Buck Henry
    David Heyman
    Laurent Heynemann
    Robert Hossein
    Jean-Loup Hubert
    Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu
    Gilles Jacob
    Just Jaeckin
    Alain Jessua
    Pierre Jolivet
    Kent Jones
    Roger Kahane,
    Nelly Kaplan
    Wong Kar Waï
    Ladislas Kijno
    Harmony Korine
    Jan Kounen
    Diane Kurys
    Emir Kusturica
    John Landis
    Claude Lanzmann
    André Larquié
    Vinciane Lecocq
    Patrice Leconte
    Claude Lelouch
    Gérard Lenne
    David Lynch
    Michael Mann
    François Margolin
    Jean-Pierre Marois
    Tonie Marshall
    Mario Martone
    Nicolas Mauvernay
    Radu Mihaileanu
    Claude Miller
    Mario Monicelli
    Jeanne Moreau
    Sandra Nicolier
    Michel Ocelot
    Alexander Payne
    Richard Pena
    Michele Placido
    Philippe Radault
    Jean-Paul Rappeneau
    Raphael Rebibo
    Yasmina Reza
    Jacques Richard
    Laurence Roulet
    Walter Salles
    Jean-Paul Salomé
    Marc Sandberg
    Jerry Schatzberg
    Julian Schnabel
    Barbet Schroeder
    Ettore Scola
    Martin Scorcese
    Charlotte Silvera
    Abderrahmane Sissako
    Paolo Sorrentino
    Guillaume Stirn
    Tilda Swinton
    Jean-Charles Tacchella
    Radovan Tadic
    Danis Tanovic
    Bertrand Tavernier
    Cécile Telerman
    Alain Terzian
    Pascal Thomas
    Giuseppe Tornatore
    Serge Toubiana
    Nadine Trintignant
    Tom Tykwer
    Alexandre Tylski
    Betrand Van Effenterre
    Wim Wenders

    A trip to imdb dot com will let you find any film that any of these fine examples of Moonbat Scheiss-mongery have been involve in.

    If gambling online were not of questionable legality and hard to enforce, I would almost be persuaded to bet that every one of these perfect specimens of morally relativistic modern humanity is at least a Liberal, if not an outright Marxist. Keep in mind that a Conservative in European politics is both rare and functionally to the Left of Buraq Hussein. I would feel even surer that not one of them is anything approaching our conception of a conservative or libertarian. If a cause draws exclusively from one political demographic, it cannot be blamed on another.

    I would add something else to Tailfin‘s suggestion:

    Whoopi Goldberg is spokes-pervert for both Toys-R-Us [from a picture I saw] and is on TV in the same role for T-Mobile cell phones. If both companies get repeated complaints about them using someone who thinks that drugging a child and then orally, vaginally, and anally raping her is not really rape because he is such an artist; it might affect her where it hurts.

    In the pocketbook.

    Because we can neither put a dent in her self-esteem nor cause pangs to her conscience. The former because it is not based on anything but her ego, the latter because it does not exist.

    LC Subotai Bahadur

  40. 40
    YGBSM says:

    Gee, you’d think ACORN would want to sit out this Polanski business, but I hear they too are rushing to his defense with help from even more Hollywood bigshots. Yessir, ACORN has drawn up it’s own petition to defend Polanski. And an impressive document it is! It bears the signatures of dozens of famous stars and other influential personalities – easy enough to acquire for an organization that prides itself in “getting out the vote by any means necessary”
    Now, there are those who claim ACORN “stuffs ballot boxes” or “conjures up questionable voters out of seemingly anywhere” and “use dead people as voters”, etc. etc. ACORN points out that such slurs are the work of angry right wingers, and that they, ACORN, vouch for the authenticity of their “Free Polanski” petition.

    You tell’em ACORN!

    And as proof, here’s just a few of the Hollywood notables they have signed up.

    Jack Oakie
    Jessica Tandy
    Rock Hudson
    Dick Powell
    Francis X. Bushman
    Cecil B. DeMille
    Frederic March
    Clara Bow
    Abbott & Costello
    John Barrymore
    Douglas Fairbanks sr. AND jr.
    Greta Garbo
    Harold Lloyd
    Gary Cooper
    Ed Wood
    Bela Lugosi
    Constance Bennett
    Jackie Gleason
    June Taylor Dancers
    Ruby Keeler
    Paul Newman
    Mae West
    Jack Benny
    Rochester
    Judy Garland
    Adolph Menjou
    Moe Howard
    Curley Howard
    Larry Fine
    Freddie Bartholomew
    Spencer Tracy
    Walter Brennan
    Henry Fonda
    Jane Fonda

    And many, many more.

    With folks like these on board, who says ACORN isn’t legit?

  41. 41
    LC Gunsniper says:

    In regards to YGBSM’s comment @#45 :

    :em99:

    I’m surprised they missed Fatty Arbuckle.

  42. 42
    LC TerribleTroy, Imperial Centurion says:

    From his noticable absence…… Im guessing Charlie Chaplin is a conservative?

  43. 43
    oldwolves says:

    Damn it! Why couldn’t Polanski be a priest? Then you know the left would have had him shot!

  44. 44

    LC TerribleTroy, Imperial Centurion sez:

    Whoah! Wait a minute here… when did stomping puppies become a bad thing?

    I certainly hope DOG didn’t watch you type that.

    And about the only name on Subotai‘s list I ever liked any of their shit if they recognized their names at all anyway was David Lynch. I’ll miss “Twin Peaks”.

  45. 45
    LC TerribleTroy, Imperial Centurion says:

    ppsssssst……DJ…. I hear they have some very nice russian girls in Dubai………you could even buy one there…… cause god knows thats the only way your gonna get your ugly ass laid :em01:

  46. 46
    AyUaxe says:

    LC Subotai Bahadur sez:

    Monica Bellucci

    NNNNNNNOOOOOOOO!!!!!

  47. 47
    Elephant Man says:

    I’m glad you didn’t copyright that, cause I’ma gonna use it daily–recockulous–fookin’ genius!

    I don’t know….

    I seem to recall that word used in an old Star Trek episode.

    Stardate 34267mark2….We were engaged in exploring the Recockulous Nebula when we were hailed by a Recockulan battlecruiser…

    Something like that :em01:

  48. 48
    LC Subotai Bahadur says:

    Here is a little something about the ties of the Left to Roman Polanski. Given the nature of our chew toys, it seems fitting. From PAJAMAS MEDIA:

    http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/sorry-leftism-you-dont-get-to-disown-the-polanski-list/

    LC Subotai Bahadur

  49. 49
    LC HJ Caveman82952 says:

    Thank You, Subotai. A good read. The left appears to be in a quandary, their collective panties in a bunch. Its fine to support a fucking child rapist, but my oh my, it does wonders to your ratings. Such a delightful hypocrisy in action, no doubt raising the sales of Pepto Bismol in Hollywood. For most lefties can’t stomach child molesters either, the most universally despised miscreats gracing the planet. This game of moral relativism seems to be growing limits…especially when financial ramifications are now making themselves apparent. Hollywood needs to understand we don’t need them…they DO need us. Perhaps, just for a mement, this little chickenshit game of shock therapy they play may be put on hold.

  50. 50
    Elephant Man says:

    Again, a broad brush.

    I think the “broad brush” is being applied because most if not all of these Hollywood celebrities are the face and spokespeople for the Left.

    These same people are trotted out to push whatever liberal cause is in vogue at the moment.

    The thing is, if they choose to defend a sadistic child rapist, at the very least their judgement comes into question which will taint their credibility the next time they’re marched out to espouse the next liberal cause.

    It’ll be interesting to see if the “rank and file” Left holds these Hollywood celebrities accountable for their stance on Polanski or whether they go into “nothing to see here, move along” mode.

    I think we all know how that’s going to turn out… 🙄

    To be fair though, the “rank and file” Left may surprise me. I’ll be on the lookout for flying pigs. :em01:

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.