Yeah, and the Protection of a Nutless GOP Band of Buggerers

John Podhoretz makes a lot of good points about how the Lying King Obama Misadministration got so brazen about lying and breaking the law, most of them having to do with the Democrat Socialist Party’s National Socialist Party Loyalty Uber Alles, which is true, and the so-called “press” being so far into Obama’s pants that it’s a wonder they survived the dry cleaner.

But he misses out on one point:

He has always had the protection of Senate Democrats, who have not acted in any way to trouble him regarding these scandals and who have impeded aggressive investigations into them.

What “aggressive investigations”, pray tell? And please don’t mention Darrel “McClellan” Issa unless you’re deliberately trying to make us die laughing.

Just exactly where, pray tell, have Darrel “McClellan” Issa’s numerous opened, lead-to-nowhere, let’s not actually set down a select committee to investigate because that might upset the New York Slimes’ editors, “investigations” been in any way “aggressive?”

We have to exercise extreme patience and benefit of the doubt way and beyond the call of duty in order to not say that every single one of his “investigations” have been nothing but kabuki theater designed to appear as effort while being carefully designed to not actually accomplish anything. To keep the natives calm, of course. For years, YEARS we’ve been told over and over again, on a weekly basis, that “tomorrow’s testimony would blow [insert any one of Darrel's brilliant and "aggressive" investigations here] WIDE open”, but nothing has ever actually blown anywhere, has it? He has opened umpteen different investigations, but he hasn’t close a single damn one.

Faced with that kind of nutless cowardice and collaboration, it’s no bloody wonder that the Democrat Socialists have felt emboldened to push forward with ever more of their illegal, unconstitutional power grabs. Why the hell wouldn’t they? Their opposition is perfectly happy letting them get away with it as long as they can pretend to be fighting against it.

Hey, Darrel: Since you’re not willing to use your committee, I’d like to borrow it for a while.

You puling traitorous, gutless piece of shit un-American yellow-bellied son of a Nazi-fucking whore.

Thatisall.

Oh, and as to the headline of that piece, “Why Obama can’t wave away this scandal”, don’t make us laugh.

That’s exactly why he can and will do so. Because there is not one functioning set of testicles in all of the GOP and because they will do their damndest, destroy the nation if they have to, in order to avoid the risk of having Paul Krugman call them names.

On 9/11, that horrible day, one plane got diverted from its goal thanks to Providence and the unfathomable courage of its passengers. Why did that plane have to be Flight 93? If I could swap the life of one, just one of the people in the Pentagon or the Towers for every single life of the parasitical cancers in Washington DC that that plane was aimed at, just one, I’d take the deal and spend the rest of my days knowing that I got one HECK of a bargain.

11 comments

  1. 1
    single stack growls and barks:

    I guess the scum is going to be allowed to engage in an endless litany of high crimes and misdemeanors openly and brazenly while rubbing our noses in it and daring us to do anything about it forever.

    And shouldn’t they be the Band of Buggerees since they’re the ones constantly bending over and begging for more? But then, the GOP is doing us dry and we’re letting them get away with it so maybe they are buggerers after all. :em08:

  2. 2
    Orion growls and barks:

    Well, clearly o dread Emperor, the One has simply done nothing wrong!

    THAT is why the investigations into the IRS, DOJ, NSA, Benghazi, Fast and Furious, etc. etc. etc. have found nothing!

    Occam’s razor, you see? Now, can we all get back to worshipping our betters, as instructed?

    Orion

  3. 3
    HempRopeAndStreetlight growls and barks:

    Oh the stories I could tell.

    OPSEC is a bitch.

    People.. it’s long past time to misbehave.

    Pick your objective. Gather the right equipment. You SHOULD have been working on the PT these past few years. Reconnoiter the objective. Practice, practice, and practice through dry runs, using models, photos, or even better mock-ups if you can manage them.

    Time for jaw jaw is over.

  4. 4
    Fa Cube Itches growls and barks:

    What “aggressive investigations”, pray tell? And please don’t mention Darrel “McClellan” Issa unless you’re deliberately trying to make us die laughing.

    Issa dared to question a god (which, in Islam, that’s enough to make him the very devil). You really can’t get more aggressive than that.

  5. 5

    On 9/11, that horrible day, one plane got diverted from its goal thanks to Providence and the unfathomable courage of its passengers. Why did that plane have to be Flight 93? If I could swap the life of one, just one of the people in the Pentagon or the Towers for every single life of the parasitical cancers in Washington DC that that plane was aimed at, just one, I’d take the deal and spend the rest of my days knowing that I got one HECK of a bargain.

    Too fucking right, Sire.
    LC cmblake6, Imperial Black Ops Technician recently posted..The one promise Barack Obama has kept: The price of electricity skyrocketsMy Profile

  6. 6
    LC Xystus growls and barks:

    On 9/11, that horrible day, one plane got diverted from its goal thanks to Providence and the unfathomable courage of its passengers. Why did that plane have to be Flight 93?

    Why question Providence? I’d prefer to trust Providence myself. It ain’t over. Could be pleasant (for us) surprises in store the next few years. Not sayin’ we shouldn’t be prepared for other results, though I suspect the better positioned we are, the less we’ll have to do.

  7. 7
    bruce growls and barks:

    Debbie schlussel said issa was a crook and that nothing will done about bongos’ law breaking. because we have too many rinos in congress.

  8. 8
    Anthony L. growls and barks:

    GOP? Aggressive?!? Pfft. I’ll believe that when articles of impeachment are drawn up…Even then I would think long and hard about ever supporting them again.

  9. 9
    Slightly to the right of Gingis Khan growls and barks:

    Anthony L. says:

    GOP? Aggressive?!? Pfft. I’ll believe that when articles of impeachment are drawn up…Even then I would think long and hard about ever supporting them again.

    I was the guy, who for a long time considered the GOP primary the election. Come November I did my duty as good soldier and supported my team. A few years back I started getting REAL finicky about who got the support of my limited dollars and man hours for support……. At this point I simply can’t support in anyway some of the Republicans that appear on my November ballot.

    I’ve arrived at the point many of you have been at for a long time, I can’t consider myself a Republican anymore. I still may vote for individuals, even individuals that turn my stomach to some point if it mean keeping a greater evil out of office, but the bloom is off the rose. At this point I think it would be easier to start anew than to fix the GOP.

  10. 10
    Library Czar growls and barks:

    At this point I think it would be easier to start anew than to fix the GOP.

    You can’t fix stupid.

  11. 11
    readerjp growls and barks:

    Boy with cancer loses coverage after Obamacare launch
    Bureaucrats won’t help unless he is ‘pregnant or an illegal alien’

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/boy-with-cancer-loses-coverage-after-obamacare-launch/#yPAostx8kbtU5Csi.99