Carbeque season is starting early this year

From the cum buckets at the BBC:

A fourth night of unprecedented riots in Stockholm has seen unrest spread, with a restaurant and up to 40 cars burnt, police told the BBC.  Three police officers were hurt as rioters threw stones and directed laser pointers at emergency services.

Ahh just another night out for the Muzzies

The unrest began on Sunday in the deprived, largely immigrant suburb of Husby, to the north-west of the city.  Days earlier the police had shot dead an elderly man who had allegedly threatened to kill them with a machete.

Da police will do that.  Here’s a Public Safety tip from us here at the ‘Rott.  Don’t threaten the police with a machete and you won’t get lethal dose 9mm poisoning.

We have never had this kind of riots before in Stockholm, not this amount of riots and not this number of hot areas”   The worst of the latest rioting has been in the south of the city.  Stockholm police spokesman Kjell Lindgren said the rioters were a “mixture of every kind of people”.

But share a common interest in beheading, castrating women and killing anybody that doesn’t worship a pedophile prophet.

Activists in the Husby area have accused police of racist behaviour – an accusation greeted with scepticism by the police themselves.

Just you need it most, rest assured your covered with the International Racism Card.  When absolutely need media attention the Race Card has you covered.

Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt has said everybody must take responsibility for restoring calm in Stockholm.  “It’s important to remember that burning your neighbour’s car is not an example of freedom of speech, it’s hooliganism,” he said on Wednesday.

Well, we here in America we call intentional destruction of private property and in certain areas it results traumatic gunshot wounds.  That’s why we don’t have rioting.  Oh LA?  Ask the Koreans about what happens when you want to play Poncho the Pyromaniac with THIER businesses.

It is unclear how many cars have been burnt since Sunday as a result of the rioting, Mr Lindgren told the BBC.  But on Wednesday night 10 attacks were reported in the north-western suburbs while between 20 and 30 were burnt in southern parts of Stockholm.

Check with the insurance companies dumbass.

Firefighters struggled to contain the fire at the restaurant in the southern suburb of Skogas, where young people pelted them with stones, the spokesman said.  Groups of rioters, as small as five people and as large as 100, have been seen this week, Mr Lindgren said.  They have typically waited for emergency services to attend a fire before attacking them.

Even our scumbags won’t attack firefighters and paramedics…then again it’s usually because they’ll need them in future so it’s best not to piss off somebody that can save your sorry ass.

Green laser pointers have also been shone in the eyes of the emergency services, according to Mr Lindgren.

Again, here in the land of 300 million guns lasers are usually attached to guns and doing such a thing tends to draw flying lead…lots of flying lead…think Pickett’s Charge at Gettysburg and you’ll have the general idea.

No arrests were made on Wednesday night because the police’s priority was to disperse mobs and ensure access to fires for the fire brigade, he said. Overall, five people have been arrested since Sunday.

In other words “We want to stop them rioting but we don’t want to offend them by arresting them.”  Great plan there.  Have you considered a position with the Department of Homeland Insecurity?

The Stockholm police spokesman said rioting had occurred in both deprived parts of the city and parts that would be considered “normal”.   ”My colleagues say the people on the streets are a mixture of every kind of people you can think of,” he added.

See above.

 ”We have got Swedes, we have got very young people, we have got people aged 30 to 35. You can’t define them as a group.  ”We don’t know why they are doing this. There is no answer to it.”   In Husby, more than 80% of the 12,000 or so inhabitants are from an immigrant background, and most are from Turkey, the Middle East and Somalia.

There isn’t a Cluebat™ big enough to beat you with…

 Rami al-Khamisi, a law student and founder of the youth organisation Megafonen, told the Swedish edition of online newspaper The Local this week that he had been insulted racially by police. Teenagers, he said, had been called “monkeys”, fuelling resentment.

Well, if your going to riot like one then the description fits.

 The Stockholm police spokesman said he was aware that prosecutors were investigating complaints, and the behaviour of one police officer in particular.

Someone better dig up Johnnie Cochran stat and he’ll have that cop pleading the Fifth in no time.

But he added that he could “hardly believe” all the complaints being made were true.   ”We have never had this kind of riots before in Stockholm, not this amount of riots and not this number of hot areas,” said Mr Lindgren.

Well, the French have some experience with carbeques, maybe they can phone in some pointers.  In other words get used to it.  Now they know they can get away with it dumbass so Stockholm is going to look like Dresden by August.

Tam had a good comment on this that maybe a harbinger for the future:

 I dunno… The EUtopians may seem all soft, docile, and toothless right now, but the recent immigrant welfare sponge class is playing with fire here. Euros have a proven zero-to-jackboots time lower than just about anybody on the planet. Get Gunter or Pierre all backed into a corner and feeling existentially threatened and you’ll be wishing you hadn’t, faster than you can say “Arbeit Macht Frei”.

(And if and when nationalist parties do take over and dust off the banners and jackboots and whatever happens, happens… well… the liberal leftists who discouraged assimilation and encouraged welfare subsidies, the very factors that created these ghetto islands of alien discontent, will have nobody to blame but themselves.)

 

24 comments

  1. 1
    Emperor Misha I growls and barks:

    I dunno… The EUtopians may seem all soft, docile, and toothless right now, but the recent immigrant welfare sponge class is playing with fire here. Euros have a proven zero-to-jackboots time lower than just about anybody on the planet.

    Very true, and the muzzies and anybody else would do well to remember that.

    Americans are famously slow to anger, but when you DO anger them Hell follows. Europeans aren’t all that slow, but Hell follows just the same.

    And we’re infamous, and justly so, for having absolutely NO remorse when we DO let loose.
    Emperor Misha I recently posted..Admin NoticeMy Profile

  2. 2
    irish19 growls and barks:

    Holger Dansk may yet shake himself awake after his long sleep.

  3. 3
    Fa Cube Itches growls and barks:

    I guess the Saracens missed the Swedish pol who had advised his subjects to be nice to the invaders so they would be nice in return.

  4. 4
    Fa Cube Itches growls and barks:

    Volvo, Volvo, burning bright
    In the Scandinavian night

  5. 5
    LC Old Dog growls and barks:

    I also hear nasty rumors that there are some Celts dusting off the Clan Heirloom Claymores! :em03:
    LC Old Dog recently posted..Time by the NinesMy Profile

  6. 6
    Igor, Imperial Booby growls and barks:

    Yeah, I’m pretty sure the jackboots in the EU are stocking up on cans of whoop-ass.

    “Zero-to-jackboots” Heh. Gonna have to remember that one! :em01:

  7. 7
    kmhendu growls and barks:

    We are eventually going to have to eradicate the cancer known as Islam. It’s really that simple. There is no radical Islam. This is how they have behaved throughout their entire existence and I want to know when in bloody hell are we going to do something about it!

  8. 8
    Eric Praline growls and barks:

    kmhendu says:

    There is no radical Islam.

    An Israeli commentator once said: “Radical muslims want to kill you. Moderate muslims want radical muslims to kill you.”

  9. 9
    LC Jackboot IC/A growls and barks:

    Igor, Imperial Booby says:

    “Zero-to-jackboots

    Someone page me?….oh nevermind….back to bed….

    :em05:
    LC Jackboot IC/A recently posted..Just a ThoughtMy Profile

  10. 10

    kmhendu says:

    We are eventually going to have to eradicate the cancer known as Islam. It’s really that simple. There is no radical Islam. This is how they have behaved throughout their entire existence and I want to know when in bloody hell are we going to do something about it!

    We’re going to have to fairly soon, or the world is going to go Riddick.

  11. 11
    Fa Cube Itches growls and barks:

    kmhendu @ #:

    We are eventually going to have to eradicate the cancer known as Islam. It’s really that simple. There is no radical Islam. This is how they have behaved throughout their entire existence and I want to know when in bloody hell are we going to do something about it!

    We’ll have to withdraw from the Convention on the Prevention & Punishment of the Crime of Genocide beforehand, and get plenty of other folks to join us in that. It will also require a fair amount of domestic Constitution shredding for all concerned, too. The legal gymnastics will be interesting on that one, for every country that joins up with the eradication campaign.

  12. 12
    Wraith growls and barks:

    (And if and when nationalist parties do take over and dust off the banners and jackboots and whatever happens, happens… well… the liberal leftists who discouraged assimilation and encouraged welfare subsidies, the very factors that created these ghetto islands of alien discontent, will have nobody to blame but themselves.)

    Sure they will. It’s Bush’s fault. :em07:
    Wraith recently posted..A smack with a rolled-up ConstitutionMy Profile

  13. 13
    kmhendu growls and barks:

    I did not say we had to eradicate Muslims I said we had to eradicate Islam. They are NOT the same thing. The pagan religions of ancient Greece and Rome are largely irrelevant and that was not due to genocide. It was due to them being defeated in the arena of ideas and largely discredited. Don’t try to accuse me of advocating genocide when I did nothing of the sort.

  14. 14
    kmhendu growls and barks:

    Maybe the word eradicate was too harsh and that’s where the misunderstanding is. Nonetheless Islam has been at war with the entire world since its inception. My ideas are to be as openly hostile to Islam as the left is towards Christianity. Islam is the greatest threat the world has ever known and if you cant see that then you are blind

  15. 15
    kmhendu growls and barks:

    We will have to crack a few eggs to make that omelet though

  16. 16
    LC TerribleTroy growls and barks:

    What needs to happen is that Islam needs a “reformation” similar to christianity. Seems to me (I’m hardly a student on the subject) that the old testament God wasn’t as warm and fuzzy as the new testament god. Now the question becomes “what method of motivation” is to be used, and who to direct it toward.

  17. 17
    Fa Cube Itches growls and barks:

    kmhendu @ #:

    I did not say we had to eradicate Muslims I said we had to eradicate Islam. They are NOT the same thing.

    It’s still genocide either way. It includes “national, ethnical, racial, or religious” groups. It doesn’t even require killing. Stuff like forced conversions or forced relocations counted as genocidal acts under the original Convention, though most of the non-killing language has since been revised to the broader language of “causing serious mental harm”. Plainly, eradicating the concept of Islam would cause serious mental harm to most Muslims. Outlawing and destroying someone’s faith can be pretty traumatic.

    Note that by simply stating that we need to eradicate Islam, you’ve violated Article III(c) of the Convention: “The following acts shall be punishable: . . . (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide.” Per Article IV, priviate individuals “shall be punished” for any “acts enumerated in article III.” So yeah, you’re a genocidaire, not that you’re exactly a minority of one: under the straight terms of the Convention, probably 90% of the population of the planet has violated Article III at least once, and probably a majority of them do so on a fairly regular basis. I doubt that any of us will ever be prosecuted for it, however. On a larger stage, however, this problem will certainly given upper-level politicians pause.

  18. 18
    kmhendu growls and barks:

    I have not read the genocide convention laws nor will I. They mean nothing because they are not enforced in today’s world. Islam has violated the laws that you stated everyday since that law was written. How about criticizing the greatest perpetrators of genocide (according to this genocide convention) the world has ever seen instead of nitpicking semantics?

  19. 19
    Fa Cube Itches growls and barks:

    kmhendu @ #:

    I have not read the genocide convention laws nor will I.

    You haven’t, but bureaucrats have. That’s the point – the people who would be necessary in any serious effort to make any sort of global effort on Islam are well aware of what could result – a politician who travels outside the country would be an easy target for prosecution in any signatory nation. It wouldn’t necessarily be hard for a radical Islamic group to exploit that and basically pull another Spanish job – inlfict enough pain to force a weak government to nab a stronger nation’s leader/diplomats, if that nation had espoused doing away with Islam.

    They mean nothing because they are not enforced in today’s world.

    Of course not. They basically require every signatory nation to go to war against any group that is engaging in genocide. As a result, everyone always goes to great lengths to describe things they way they described Rwanda – everyone worked very hard to avoid using the magic word “genocide.”

    Islam has violated the laws that you stated everyday since that law was written.

    Enh, other than some buddhist monks (maybe), find me any group that hasn’t had at least some of its members do so on a regular basis. That is the other reason that it is largely ignored.

    How about criticizing the greatest perpetrators of genocide (according to this genocide convention) the world has ever seen instead of nitpicking semantics?

    I’ve never made much secret of my views on Islam. The few non-firebreathing strands (the Maylaysian variety being the prime example) are no big deal. The vast majority of it is extremely dangerous, however. The question of genocide, however, isn’t one of semantics – like it or not, the Convention is binding on signatories, and any group advocating the elimination of Islam (in whatever manner) could find itself on the wrong side of a massive counter-alliance. It would likely be a dishonest and opportunistic one, but it would also have the chance to take down a rival/gain ground and resources, etc.

  20. 20
    kmhendu growls and barks:

    Fa Cube Itches says:

    kmhendu @ #:

    I have not read the genocide convention laws nor will I.

    You haven’t, but bureaucrats have. That’s the point – the people who would be necessary in any serious effort to make any sort of global effort on Islam are well aware of what could result – a politician who travels outside the country would be an easy target for prosecution in any signatory nation. It wouldn’t necessarily be hard for a radical Islamic group to exploit that and basically pull another Spanish job – inlfict enough pain to force a weak government to nab a stronger nation’s leader/diplomats, if that nation had espoused doing away with Islam.

    They mean nothing because they are not enforced in today’s world.

    Of course not. They basically require every signatory nation to go to war against any group that is engaging in genocide. As a result, everyone always goes to great lengths to describe things they way they described Rwanda – everyone worked very hard to avoid using the magic word “genocide.”

    Islam has violated the laws that you stated everyday since that law was written.

    Enh, other than some buddhist monks (maybe), find me any group that hasn’t had at least some of its members do so on a regular basis. That is the other reason that it is largely ignored.

    How about criticizing the greatest perpetrators of genocide (according to this genocide convention) the world has ever seen instead of nitpicking semantics?

    I’ve never made much secret of my views on Islam. The few non-firebreathing strands (the Maylaysian variety being the prime example) are no big deal. The vast majority of it is extremely dangerous, however. The question of genocide, however, isn’t one of semantics – like it or not, the Convention is binding on signatories, and any group advocating the elimination of Islam (in whatever manner) could find itself on the wrong side of a massive counter-alliance. It would likely be a dishonest and opportunistic one, but it would also have the chance to take down a rival/gain ground and resources, etc.

    You are one tough sob to debate with ill give you that. What is your proposed solution? I believe we should attempt to discredit Islam as part of govt policy not completely openly but we must stop saying Islam is peacefully because that is total horseshit

  21. 21
    Fa Cube Itches growls and barks:

    kmhendu @ #:

    What is your proposed solution?

    The West needs to do a lot of internal housecleaning, very quickly. Discredit multiculturalism, cultural marxism, and all of that rot, reinstill some respect for our own traditions and accomplishments, and get our own civilization re-energized. That would probably save places that aren’t too badly infested yet. Might well have to write off places like Great Britain, Sweden, France, etc. (or at least significant parts of them). Taking some steps to work with India would be good (they understand the threat). Dealing with China is an important step, too. They’ve been happy to let the rest of the world deal with Islam (while they struggle quietly with their own Western provinces). Either bring them into an Non-Islamic Alliance, or cut them off.

    Realistically, there will probably have to be forced deportations from the nations that can withstand the invasion. Short term – expect increasing violence and more than a little mass slaughter in some areas. Mid term, my guess is that there will be some sort of deal struck between what amounts to a reformed Caliphate and the rest of the world. Islam takes the Middle East, Asia Minor, Central Asia, Africa, and chunks of Europe, and both sides allow surviving religious minorities in their respective zones of control to “return home” to friendly areas. If it’s ostensibly voluntary relocation, that keeps everything nice and diplomatic. Long term? That’s a tough question, and the answer depends on what coalition can hold together best.

    It’s an ugly problem, in large part because it’s so damned hydra-headed. It’s not *just* militant Islam, it’s also rampant Leftism, societal exhaustion, demographic imbalance, economic instability, and all feeding on each other.

  22. 22
    Fa Cube Itches growls and barks:

    kmhendu @ #:

    I believe we should attempt to discredit Islam as part of govt policy not completely openly but we must stop saying Islam is peacefully because that is total horseshit

    That would help, as would giving voice to the dissenting elements within Islam.

  23. 23
    Alan K. Henderson growls and barks:

    Dang, did the Parisian carbecues last for this many days?

  24. 24
    LC Grammar Czar, G.L.O.R. growls and barks:

    Even our scumbags won’t attack firefighters and paramedics

    ‘Taint ‘zactly true. See Louisiana, New Orleans, circa Hurricane Katrina.