Women and the Democrats who don’t trust them

For years we’ve been inundated with the Left’s whining about the so called “War On Women”, and sadly there are plenty of women willing to be used by the Left to push idiotic schemes and policies that don’t do a damn thing to actually help women, except to further portray them as abortion hungry sluts. They have managed to reduce women to nothing more than a vagina with boobs. Forget using their brains. Forget trying to educate themselves. To find a dream and work for it. To making their homes and lives the best they can be. Being responsible and mature about their choices. Fuggetaboutit. It’s all about what’s between their legs and who is going to pay the plumbing bill.

So it’s not going to surprise me much to hear the crickets chirping from the so-called Women’s Rights groups over what Colorado State Rep. Joe Salazar spewed out of his worthless piehole recently. They wouldn’t dare to challenge an inept member of their misogynistic leftist masters for portraying them as overemotional, mentally weak and incapable of rational thought in the midst of a crisis.

While debating a bill on the Colorado house floor that would ban all firearms from Colorado university campuses, freshman lawmaker Joe Salazar (D-Thorton) suggested female college students should not have guns because they may shoot a non-rapist due to an irrational fear of being raped.

Now I think that if you looked at the statistics, the chances of a woman being raped on a college campus are certainly great enough, that that fear doesn’t qualify as irrational. I suppose he believes that having Homeowners Insurance and a fire extinguisher shows an irrational fear of your house burning down? Plus I take exception to the fact that he is painting women as walking masses of paranoia to the point of pointing a gun at every moving object just because she thinks it’s going to rape her. A Leftist portrayal of women incapable of being rational thinkers and unable to recognize a legitimate threat to their safety, and worse, incapable of carrying and safely using a firearm to protect themselves. Projection anyone?

“It’s why we have call boxes, it’s why we have safe zones, it’s why we have the whistles. Because you just don’t know who you’re gonna be shooting at. And you don’t know, if you feel like you’re gonna be raped, or if you feel like someone’s been following you around or if you feel like you’re in trouble when you may actually not be, that you pop out that gun and you pop … pop a round at somebody.”

Feeeeewings….nothing more than Feeeewings…..

Women are only able to feeeeeel like someone’s following them. We aren’t smart enough to KNOW if someone is following us. We only feeeeel like we’re about to be in trouble. We aren’t capable of KNOWING if we are about to be in trouble. We can only feeeeeel like the man making threatening advances on us is about to rape us when he’s obviously only selling Girl Scout Cookies. We’re so damn stupid that we’ll double tap his ass right through those boxes of Thin Mints without a second thought.

Call boxes and safe zones? We’ve all seen what those “Gun Free Zones” have done to ensure that people aren’t mass murdered by the insane. Call boxes…what if they are out of order? What if there is no one there to answer the call? Can they absolutely guarantee 100% there will always be help using those? Whistles…. I don’t know a single male that doesn’t cringe at the thought of a woman blowing a whistle at him. That ranks right up there with “Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time.”.

I don’t go around feeeeewing that someone is going to do something to me that they shouldn’t. I might feel that I am uncomfortable about a situation, but I assess what’s going on around me, and determine what is causing the uneasiness. Is there something or someone around me that is threatening, or is it the fact that I just watched Texas Chainsaw Massacre IV last night? Is that man following me across the parking lot to attack me or is he just walking to his own car? If I can walk with someone else to my car I do it. If I feel threatened and can change course and walk toward other people I do it. I don’t assume my only defense is drawing a gun, but I won’t be an easy victim either. If there is a way to get away from a threat first..I do it. Walk tall, briskly, and eyes working. My firearm positioned where I can draw it quickly. If I judge that there is indeed a threat, can I get to where there are other people or will I have to stand my ground? Rapists prefer victims that are not paying attention to anything around them. A woman with her head down texting on her cell phone is an easier target than one walking briskly with her head up and looking around. I don’t get twitchy just because I’m a bag of over emotional hormones waiting for a chance to “pop a round” on some innocent guy standing 30 feet away, on the chance that I feeeeeel he’s thinking of raping/mugging/harming me. Of all the years that I have carried a gun, if I got that damn paranoid, there would be a mass shooting every time I went to Walmart.

Rep. Salazar isn’t the only numbnuts spouting drivel like this. The University of Colorado-Colorado Springs is offering some “advice” to students who may get attacked on campus, at home or on the road.

1. Be realistic about your ability to protect yourself.

I am very realistic about my ability to protect myself with my .45. Not so realistic about that damn whistle you keep trying to force me to use.

2. Your instinct may be to scream, go ahead! It may startle your attacker and give you an opportunity to run away.

How about I aim my .45 at his chest and scream “STOP or I’ll SHOOT your sorry ass!”

3. Kick off your shoes if you have time and can’t run in them.

If I have time to kick off my shoes, I have time to draw my firearm.

4. Don’t take time to look back; just get away.

Ya think? What if I want to stop to make sure he’s still following?

5. If your life is in danger, passive resistance may be your best defense.

If my life is in danger, a high velocity bullet to center mass is my best defense dumbass. Plus…could you please define “passive resistance”? Is that something like Jumbo Shrimp or Congressional Ethics?

6. Tell your attacker that you have a disease or are menstruating.

Sorry Dude…I’m surfing the crimson wave with a case of crabs. Better luck next time.

7. Vomiting or urinating may also convince the attacker to leave you alone.

Making my attacker vomit blood and shit his pants will convince him as well.

8. Yelling, hitting or biting may give you a chance to escape, do it!
9. Understand that some actions on your part might lead to more harm.

Ok…so yelling, hitting, and biting is a good idea, BUT it might lead to more harm…so don’t do that. Gotcha.

10. Remember, every emergency situation is different. Only you can decide which action is most appropriate.

Only I can decide…as long as I decide to do it the way these asshats want me to do it. Which would most likely end with me being raped, beaten, and most probably dead, because we can’t have these over emotional, weak women using a tool that would most certainly ensure they weren’t assaulted in the first damn place!

Standard Leftist bullshit. Let’s just give women the illusion of being safe. Let’s make them discount human nature and believe that whistles and call boxes will stop someone from committing a crime against you. Let’s make women believe they are incapable of using compatible force against an attacker to stop them. Give her a stainless steel whistle and she’s invincible. If by chance that whistle doesn’t work? Well just lay still and let him get it over with. No sense ventilating his chest cavity just because he decided to rape you. We all know he will probably just say thank you and offer you a ride home. We’re convinced he would never try to kill you to keep you from identifying him to the police. We’re sure he won’t ever do it again to another woman. After all…it’s just sex right?


  1. 1

    Lady M is a pistol-packin’ sheepdog, and as we would expect the Imperial Sniper™ to be, a deadly shot with a rifle. Ask Crunch if you don’t believe me. When the time calls for it, she can present her Springfield XD45 as fast as a mamba, and deliver an accurate double-tap.

    I work for Cheaper Than Dirt!, and most of you know that. I don’t know a single lady in our call center that doesn’t pack heat. They’re all sheepdogs, too.

    Better get your head straight, America. They are WOMAN, and they roar!

    OH, and uh, FOIST!

  2. 2
    Slightly to the right of Gingis Khan growls and barks:

    LC Sir M – Imperial Tobacconist™, K.o.E. @ #:

    Amen Sir M! My own lovely bride is more than able to defend her life against those that would do her harm. She’s practiced and tactically squared away. (Now if I could just talk her into letting me play with the new S&W Compact she purchased!)

  3. 3
    Rutho growls and barks:

    Many of these statements occur in public forums. I’m dying for someone to finally stand up and say “You Sir, with all due respect, are a fuckwit” (pardon my language).

  4. 4
    Emperor Misha I growls and barks:

    Well, as it is in this case, it’s all about one thing for ProgNazi Democrats: Control.

    He couldn’t care less about women being able to protect themselves adequately as long as it doesn’t interfere with his natural ProgNazi urges to rape everything lacking a Y chromosome, as even a cursory glance at the history of ProgNazi Democrats’ sexual activities will prove.

    It’s pretty hard for a ProgNazi Democrat to get his wang dipped in children, teens, sisters, cousins, whatever has a vagina if those same women might be able to shoot a hole in their faces.

    And clearly, that can NOT be tolerated. They’re the Ruling Class, after all, and as such are entitled to fuck, rape, fist and bone anything their perverted hearts desire without consequence.

    Do the world a favor. Shoot a ProgNazi Democrat today.

    Fucking perverts don’t deserve to live.

  5. 5
    NR Pax growls and barks:

    So not only has that list been pulled off the site, they are using the excuse of “taken out of context” to justify it.

  6. 6
    golfmax13 growls and barks:

    This is one of the most refreshing articles I have seen in a long time. Bravo! I even registered on this site so I could make this pathetic little comment. 🙂 I AM going to try to get my College daughter to read it though.

  7. 7
    HempRopeAndStreetlight growls and barks:

    Those who would try to deny us our natural rights seal their fate.

  8. 8
    LC Ohio Right Wing Nut growls and barks:

    golfmax13 @ #:

    Welcome GOLFMAX!!!1!1!!

    If you have looked around here before you know all the warnings, if not, never open any links From B.C. or Radical Redneck, if you slaughter a troll please clean it up yourself or Mrs. M will get pissed, and send you to the Imperial Gameroom to watch hours of Helen Thomas/ Hillary porn. If you get Cruncie drunk, he will tell you where the keys to The Imperial Liquor cabinet are.

    Welcome again and keep on commenting

  9. 9
    golfmax13 growls and barks:

    LC Ohio Right Wing Nut @ #: I’m guessing some of the things you just said will make a bit more sense once I’m here awhile LC Ohio. 🙂 And I’ll be careful on the links too. Thanks much for the welcome!

  10. 10
    BigDogg growls and barks:

    As I mentioned on Princess Nat’s FB thread, it’s likely that Salazar is just detailing his usual M.O. – particularly step 6.

  11. 11
    LC Gladiator growls and barks:

    HOW IS THIS LEGAL?? How is it not reverse discrimination?

    Heterosexuals Need Not Apply: DOD Extends Benefits Only to Gay Unmarried ‘Partners’
    February 19, 2013
    By Terence P. Jeffrey

    (CNSNews.com) – Outgoing Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has unilaterally issued a directive stating that the U.S. military will now extend certain benefits to unmarried domestic partners that were formerly reserved for married couples—but will only do so if the domestic partners certify in writing to the Department of Defense that they are of the same sex.

    Heterosexual unmarried partners do not qualify for the benefits—and thus are treated unequally by Panetta’s directive on the basis of their sexual orientation.

    Panetta issued his directive in a Feb. 11 memorandum to the secretaries of the military departments and the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness. The subject line on the memo said: “Extending benefits to same-sex domestic partners of military members.”

    “At the direction of the President, the Department has conducted a careful and deliberative review of the benefits currently provided to the families of Service members,” Panetta said. “We have now identified additional family member and dependent benefits that we can lawfully provide to same-sex domestic partners of Military Service members and their children through changes in Department of Defense policies and regulations.”

    “These benefits shall be extended to the same-sex domestic partners and, where applicable, children of same-sex domestic partners, once the Service member and their same-sex domestic partner have signed a declaration attesting to the existence of their committed relationship.”

    Panetta memorandum included a copy of the “declaration” by which homosexual service members will to attest that they are in what Panetta calls a “committed relationship” with another person of the same-sex. The declaration is specifically for homosexuals and does not make any allowance for people of the opposite sex who are engaged in a heterosexual so-called “committed relationship.”

    DOD’s “declaration” states that the “definition” of a “domestic partner” is as follows: “Domestic partner means a person in a domestic partnership with a Service member of the same sex.”

    In addition to being human beings of the same-sex, two service members seeking the special benefits that the Department of Defense will bestow on a “domestic partnership” must formally attest to the federal government that: “Neither of us is married (legally or by common law), joined in civil union with, or domestic partners with anyone else.”

    If two people of the same-sex attest to the Department of Defense that they are unmarried domestic partners, they also must later inform the Department of Defense if they break up and no longer are same-sex domestic partners.

    “We also agree to, and understand that: … We must inform my Service not later than 30 days after (a) the date of dissolution of the domestic partnership, (b) the date of the partnership no longer meets the eligibility requirements, or (c) termination of the domestic partnership by death.”

    Panetta’s referendum said that because of the Defense of Marriage Act, the Defense Department cannot extend all of the benefits given to married couples to unmarried same-sex “domestic partners.” But, Panetta said, “In the event that the Defense of Marriage Act is no longer applicable to the Department of Defense, it will be the policy of the Department to construe the words ‘spouse’ and ‘marriage’ without regard to sexual orientation, and married couples, irrespective of sexual orientation, will be granted full military benefits.”

    Among the benefits that DOD will now give to same-sex “domestic partners” but not heterosexual domestic partners are: joint duty assignments, legal assistance, disability and death compensation, child care, space-available travel on DOD aircraft, payments to missing persons, commissary privileges, exchange privileges, welfare and recreation programs, emergency leave, and youth programs.

  12. 12

    8. Yelling, hitting or biting may give you a chance to escape, do it!
    9. Understand that some actions on your part might lead to more harm.

    Bite him….really? The stupid is strong with this one Obi-Wan.

    Yeah and just as soon as you chomp down on the tweaked out meth-head /crackhead / IV drug user – who’s been popping with a dirty needle for the last 6 months …surprise! You’ve won the HIV/ Hepatitis Lottery!!

    Or are they going to say – “well bite but don’t break the poor dears’ skin when you do”?
    Just fucking brilliant !

    Whoever wrote this crap needs a brain transfusion preferably with a sawzall done directly through the forehead, so in the future said idiot is easily recognizable to those of us with actual brains by his or her surgery scars… because after all – you can’t fix stupid.

  13. 13
    HempRopeAndStreetlight growls and barks:

    Maybe the reason women don’t trust Democrats is because the democrats are training their DHS goons to shoot them.


    Bob Owens covers it too:


  14. 14
    Igor, Imperial Booby growls and barks:

    You have a way with words, m’lady…

    My dear saintly Better Half carries a .38 LCR and has a FlashBang holster which is cooler than snot. :em01:

    And I might add she’s sure as shootin’ not afraid to use it if the need arises.

    Two in the chest, one in the head. The other two rounds are to make sure he’s DEAD! :em05:

  15. 15
    bruce growls and barks:

    salazar,i bet he is related to that commie bongo boy from colorado ken,the traitor,salazar who could use a bullet or two in the head.my wife works in a blood bank of a major hospital and this is not a job for a piss brain like sal who would leak his brain all over his pants if he was put in the lab.my wife carries a lady smith loaded with Glaser’s which will definitely spoil a goblin”s day. colorado has been fucked up by immigrants from nyc who moved there after destroying ny and will now fuck up colorado just like they did to newhampshire vermont and maine.

  16. 16

    Rutho says:

    (pardon my language)

    Yes, a definite lack of suitable cuss words in you comment, only one use of “fuckwit”, just not up to par. We’ll let it slide this time, but don’t let it happen again. :em05:

  17. 17

    golfmax13 @ #:
    Welcome Aboard! Have you been reading here awhile?

  18. 18
    golfmax13 growls and barks:

    LC 0311 Sir Crunchie I.M.H., K.o.E. @ #:

    Hi Crunchie, this is my first day here ever. I try to look up the top Conservative sites from time to time for RSS feeds but I’ve never seen this one. I’m sure it was a tip from one of those feeds but that’s been well over 15 minutes ago, so I’ve forgotten who. Glad to be aboard though, thanks much for the Welcome!

  19. 19
    LC Sir Rurik, K.o.E. growls and barks:

    I’m sort of concerned nobody else has mentioned the obvious risk to Democrat politicians. Why Juanita Broadrick just might have prevented the Clinton maladministration.

  20. 20

    golfmax13 @ #:
    We’re glad to have ya. If ya have some time go back through some of the archives and get an idea of who and what we are. Bear in mind, you need a thick skin around here, and I hope you’re not offended by the occasional use of the word “boob”. We’re proud of our NC17 rating.

    There’s an amazing bunch of people here from a wide array of backgrounds and specialties. A large preponderance of veterans too. So kick off your shoes and make yerself comfy.

  21. 21

    LC 0311 Sir Crunchie I.M.H., K.o.E. says:

    Bear in mind, you need a thick skin around here

    Not to mention quick reflexes. Due to a sad lack of trolls, friendly fire tends to break out at odd times. The Pups get twitchy when there’s a lack of viable Libtard targets. If ya don’t watch out, they will start snarling at each other. The first aid kit is in the broom closet next to the liqueur cabinet. Just don’t get blood on the Imperial carpets. They’re a bitch to clean. :em05:

  22. 22
    majorityofone growls and barks:

    Where do the Democrats and communists (sorry I didn’t mean to repeat myself) come up with these people? The only two mindsets that could come up with this kind of advice for avoiding rape would be a real rapist or a fence post.

  23. 23
    VonZorch Imperial Researcher growls and barks:

    LC IB CiSSnarl5.7 Imperial Foreign War Correspondant says:

    Whoever wrote this crap needs a brain transfusion preferably with a sawzall done directly through the forehead, so in the future said idiot is easily recognizable to those of us with actual brains by his or her surgery scars… because after all – you can’t fix stupid.

    No, lop it off with a dull rusty axe.

  24. 24
    golfmax13 growls and barks:

    Lady M-ITT™-Imperial Sniper G.L.O.R @ #:

    Great article Lady M. I don’t mind shedding a little blood if it’s for the greater good. I’ll watch where it goes though.