Bend over, Cuntstein’s gonna give it to ya good and HARD

I’m sure trillions of internet electrons will be slain over Cuntsteins (Drudge) attempted repeat of Fort Sumter but for now I’ll leave you all with this little exchange (slightly edited) about what is coming (mtf):

Marcus Obongo: Hello Father.
Alexander Corvinus: You are unwelcome in my presence.
Marcus Obongo: Ah. The predictable heart that never thaws. Pity it beats within such a fool. The eldest of the immortals, yet you have made no attempt to seize your destiny.
Alexander Corvinus: We are oddities of nature, you and I. Nothing more! This is a world for humanity.
Marcus Obongo: And that petty sentiment explains why you rejected your sons? Why you stood by for over half a millennium as William suffered alone in darkness? No, Father, I have no respect for your petty sentiment. Viktor’s key. Where is it?
Alexander Corvinus: Whatever plan you have for William is futile. You cannot control your brother.
Marcus Obongo: Oh, I am stronger now. And our bond is greater than you have ever wanted to acknowledge.
Alexander Corvinus: You’re wrong. Soon you’ll be drowning in Lycans Patriots just like before.
Marcus Obongo: Oh, not Lycans Patriots, Father, or Vampires Cowards .  A new race created in the image of their maker. Their new God. Me.
[Marcus Obongo impales Alexander to the wall with his talon]
Marcus Obongo: And a true God
[picks up a sword]
Marcus Obongo: has no father.
[Marcus Obongo drives the sword through Alexander, then takes the key out of his top pocket]
Alexander Corvinus: You will fail.

Yes you will…yes. you. will.

PS.  I would highly suggest you all pick up a copy of Resistance to Tyranny before it’s banned also.

33 comments

  1. 1
    LC Gladiator growls and barks:

    Feinstein Goes For Broke With New Gun-Ban Bill

    Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)—author of the federal “assault weapon” and “large” ammunition magazine ban of 1994-2004—has introduced a bill to which her 1994 ban will pale by comparison. On Dec. 17th, Feinstein said, “I have been working with my staff for over a year on this legislation” and “It will be carefully focused.” Indicating the depth of her research on the issue, she said on Dec. 21st that she had personally looked at pictures of guns in 1993, and again in 2012.

    According to a Dec. 27th posting on Sen. Feinstein’s website and a draft of the bill obtained by NRA-ILA, the new ban would, among other things, adopt new definitions of “assault weapon” that would affect a much larger variety of firearms, require current owners of such firearms to register them with the federal government under the National Firearms Act, and require forfeiture of the firearms upon the deaths of their current owners. Some of the changes in Feinstein’s new bill are as follows:

    Reduces, from two to one, the number of permitted external features on various firearms. The 1994 ban permitted various firearms to be manufactured only if they were assembled with no more than one feature listed in the law. Feinstein’s new bill would prohibit the manufacture of the same firearms with even one of the features.

    Adopts new lists of prohibited external features. For example, whereas the 1994 ban applied to a rifle or shotgun the “pistol grip” of which “protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon,” the new bill would drastically expand the definition to include any “grip . . . or any other characteristic that can function as a grip.” Also, the new bill adds “forward grip” to the list of prohibiting features for rifles, defining it as “a grip located forward of the trigger that functions as a pistol grip.” Read literally and in conjunction with the reduction from two features to one, the new language would apply to every detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifle. At a minimum, it would, for example, ban all models of the AR-15, even those developed for compliance with California’s highly restrictive ban.

    Carries hyperbole further than the 1994 ban. Feinstein’s 1994 ban listed “grenade launcher” as one of the prohibiting features for rifles. Her 2013 bill carries goes even further into the ridiculous, by also listing “rocket launcher.” Such devices are restricted under the National Firearms Act and, obviously, are not standard components of the firearms Feinstein wants to ban. Perhaps a subsequent Feinstein bill will add “nuclear bomb,” “particle beam weapon,” or something else equally far-fetched to the features list.

    Expands the definition of “assault weapon” by including:

    Three very popular rifles: The M1 Carbine (introduced in 1944 and for many years sold by the federal government to individuals involved in marksmanship competition), a model of the Ruger Mini-14, and most or all models of the SKS.

    Any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds,” except for tubular-magazine .22s.

    Any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle that has an overall length of less than 30 inches,” any “semiautomatic handgun with a fixed magazine that has the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds,” and any semi-automatic handgun that has a threaded barrel.

    Requires owners of existing “assault weapons” to register them with the federal government under the National Firearms Act (NFA). The NFA imposes a $200 tax per firearm, and requires an owner to submit photographs and fingerprints to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE), to inform the BATFE of the address where the firearm will be kept, and to obtain the BATFE’s permission to transport the firearm across state lines.

    Prohibits the transfer of “assault weapons.” Owners of other firearms, including those covered by the NFA, are permitted to sell them or pass them to heirs. However, under Feinstein’s new bill, “assault weapons” would remain with their current owners until their deaths, at which point they would be forfeited to the government.

    Prohibits the domestic manufacture and the importation of magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The 1994 ban allowed the importation of such magazines that were manufactured before the ban took effect. Whereas the 1994 ban protected gun owners from errant prosecution by making the government prove when a magazine was made, the new ban includes no such protection. The new ban also requires firearm dealers to certify the date of manufacture of any >10-round magazine sold, a virtually impossible task, given that virtually no magazines are stamped with their date of manufacture.

    Targets handguns in defiance of the Supreme Court. The Court ruled in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment protects the right to have handguns for self-defense, in large part on the basis of the fact handguns are the type of firearm “overwhelmingly chosen by American society for that lawful purpose.” Semi-automatic pistols, which are the most popular handguns today, are designed to use detachable magazines, and the magazines “overwhelmingly chosen” by Americans for self-defense are those that hold more than 10 rounds. Additionally, Feinstein’s list of nearly 1,000 firearms exempted by name (see next paragraph) contains not a single handgun. Sen. Feinstein advocated banning handguns before being elected to the Senate, though she carried a handgun for her own personal protection.

    Contains a larger piece of window dressing than the 1994 ban. Whereas the 1994 ban included a list of approximately 600 rifles and shotguns exempted from the ban by name, the new bill’s list is increased to nearly 1,000 rifles and shotguns. Other than for the 11 detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifles and one other semi-automatic rifle included in the list, however, the list appears to be pointless, because a separate provision of the bill exempts “any firearm that is manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action.”

    The Department of Justice study. On her website, Feinstein claims that a study for the DOJ found that the 1994 ban resulted in a 6.7 percent decrease in murders. To the contrary, this is what the study said: “At best, the assault weapons ban can have only a limited effect on total gun murders, because the banned weapons and magazines were never involved in more than a modest fraction of all gun murders. Our best estimate is that the ban contributed to a 6.7 percent decrease in total gun murders between 1994 and 1995. . . . However, with only one year of post-ban data, we cannot rule out the possibility that this decrease reflects chance year-to-year variation rather than a true effect of the ban. Nor can we rule out effects of other features of the 1994 Crime Act or a host of state and local initiatives that took place simultaneously.”

    “Assault weapon” numbers and murder trends. From the imposition of Feinstein’s “assault weapon” ban (Sept. 13, 1994) through the present, the number of “assault weapons” has risen dramatically. For example, the most common firearm that Feinstein considers an “assault weapon” is the AR-15 rifle, the manufacturing numbers of which can be gleaned from the BATFE’s firearm manufacturer reports, available here. From 1995 through 2011, the number of AR-15s—all models of which Feinstein’s new bill defines as “assault weapons”—rose by over 2.5 million. During the same period, the nation’s murder rate fell 48 percent, to a 48-year low. According to the FBI, 8.5 times as many people are murdered with knives, blunt objects and bare hands, as with rifles of any type.

    Traces: Feinstein makes several claims, premised on firearm traces, hoping to convince people that her 1994 ban reduced the (relatively infrequent) use of “assault weapons” in crime. However, traces do not indicate how often any type of gun is used in crime. As the Congressional Research Service and the BATFE have explained, not all firearms that are traced have been used in crime, and not all firearms used in crime are traced. Whether a trace occurs depends on whether a law enforcement agency requests that a trace be conducted. Given that existing “assault weapons” were exempted from the 1994 ban and new “assault weapons” continued to be made while the ban was in effect, any reduction in the percentage of traces accounted for by “assault weapons” during the ban, would be attributable to law enforcement agencies losing interest in tracing the firearms, or law enforcement agencies increasing their requests for traces on other types of firearms, as urged by the BATFE for more than a decade.

    Call Your U.S. Senators and Representative:. President Obama has said that gun control will be a “central issue” of his final term in office, and he has vowed to move quickly on it.

    Contact your members of Congress at 202-224-3121 to urge them to oppose Sen. Feinstein’s 2013 gun and magazine ban. Our elected representatives in Congress must hear from you if we are going to defeat this gun ban proposal. You can write your Representatives and Senators by using our Write Your Representatives tool here: http://www.nraila.org/get-involved-locally/grassroots/write-your-reps.aspx

    Millions of Americans own so-called “assault weapons” and tens of millions own “large” magazines, for self-defense, target shooting, and hunting. For more information about the history of the “assault weapon” issue, please visit http://www.GunBanFacts.com.

  2. 2
    angrywebmaster growls and barks:

    Go ahead Senator Thundercunt. Just make sure you have your affairs in order when the time comes for you to be dragged out, tarred, feathered and turned into a Christmas tree decoration
    angrywebmaster recently posted..Obama and the generalsMy Profile

  3. 3
    BigDogg growls and barks:

    The blades are spinning, and the excrement is leaving the hand of the thrower …

  4. 4
    LC Gladiator growls and barks:

    Shock claim: Obama only wants military leaders who ‘will fire on U.S. citizens’

    Barack Obama
    January 21, 2013
    By: Dave Gibson

    This would explain why he wants to disarm us…

    On Monday, renowned author and humanitarian Dr. Jim Garrow made a shocking claim about what we can expect to see in Obama’s second term.

    Garrow made the following Facebook post:

    I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.” Those who will not are being removed.

    So, who is the source?

    Garrow replied: “The man who told me this is one of America’s foremost military heroes.”

    Understand, this is not coming from Alex Jones or Jesse Ventura, or from anyone else the left often dismisses with great ease.

    Garrow is a well-respected activist and has spent much of his life rescuing infant girls from China, babies who would be killed under that country’s one-child policy. He was also nominated for Nobel Peace Prize for his work.

    His bio on Amazon.com reads:

    Dr. James Garrow is the author of The Pink Pagoda: One Man’s Quest to End Gendercide in China. He has spent over $25 million over the past sixteen years rescuing an estimated 40,000 baby Chinese girls from near-certain death under China’s one-child-per-couple policy by facilitating international adoptions. He is the founder and executive director of the Bethune Institute’s Pink Pagoda schools, private English-immersion schools for Chinese children. Today he runs 168 schools with nearly 6,300 employees.

    This comes on the heels of Sunday’s report in the Washington Free Beacon (WFB) that the head of Central Command, Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis is being dismissed by Obama and will leave his post in March.

    The WFB article states:

    “Word on the national security street is that General James Mattis is being given the bum’s rush out of his job as commander of Central Command, and is being told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned.”

    Did Gen. Mattis refuse to “fire on U.S. citizens?”

  5. 5
    angrywebmaster growls and barks:

    LC Gladiator @ #:
    Yup, saw that and posted it on my blog. Of course, the generals can issue the order, but the question will be, will they be able to issue a follow up order? Of any sort?

    Rank and file troops in most cases will not only refuse to follow that sort of order, they will remove the officer issuing it. Seems we had a discussion about this in 1946 in some place called Nuremberg I think.
    angrywebmaster recently posted..Gun Appreciation Day part IIMy Profile

  6. 6
    Spin Drift growls and barks:

    Hey all you crotch munching liberal jerk wads: MOLON LABE!

    Hold Fast!

    Keep your powder dry.

    Spin Drift

  7. 7
    LC Light29ID growls and barks:

    angrywebmaster @ #:

    Indeed, the “I vas jost following ordars” shtick doesn’t fly when you know, if your side loses, your screwed gonna hang.

  8. 8
    angrywebmaster growls and barks:

    I just talked to my gun dealer. (I have an EBR but no sights or scope mount. His supplier is screwing us over) He just told me he got a shipment in of AR’s from New York. The dealers are unloading them out of state and apparently people are turning them in.
    Idiots!
    They should be using them on the Nazi’s in Albany.
    Expletive deleted NY sheep!
    angrywebmaster recently posted..Guns Across America, The New Hampshire reportMy Profile

  9. 9
    LC HJ Caveman82952 growls and barks:

    I am now developing contingencies to be implemented at a time of my choosing. My daughter my weakest link. For she knows nothing and doesn’t even shoot. I am working on that fear now. I have explained to people thinking re-education is sitting in a classroom taking notes. It is brainwashing, sensory deprivation, drugged out of your skull, sometimes driven insane, but always a dutiful slave. You know my preferences. I suspect most of my friends, certainly myself, would be slated for what Mr. Ayers refers to as liquidation.
    I have no intention of my daughter watching her father getting blown away, then she being hauled off.
    Now that tells me I would have nothing to lose, and you know what they say about such men………….and it’s a big, big country.
    And may God help those people should the free citizens prevail………..for we woud have no mercy whatsoever.
    My feelings best described as primal and basic.

  10. 10
    Tallulah growls and barks:

    Well, I dropped in to post this link to a Save the Bill of Rights petition: http://patriotpost.us/archives/petitions/21

    After reading Gladiator’s stomach-churning information, I have to add this. Take it for what it’s worth — a North Carolina police lieutenant called a radio show and said that the POLICE are also being trained to fire on us:

    Listen to the whole thing. Just leave the audio on: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZRsfU-y5HA

    This is a North Carolina police lieutenant talking, 3 weeks ago on the radio, about the govt. armed training exercises he’s seen, just in the last few months…. He says the shit is coming down soon.

    He ALSO says they’re hoping Patriots will go off half-cocked and give them an excuse to crack down. Add this to the reports that the “Dept. of Homeland Security” has bought MILLIONS of rounds of ammo in the last months, and it all adds up to a very sinister picture.

  11. 11
    Tallulah growls and barks:

    I can’t believe all this is going on, folks. It’s horrifying. Whatever happened to our country????????

    “If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival.

    “There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”

    —Winston Churchill

    STAY FROSTY.

  12. 12
    LC Light29ID growls and barks:

    angrywebmaster @ #:

    WHERE CAN I GET ONE?!?!?!

  13. 13
    angrywebmaster growls and barks:

    LC Light29ID @ #:

    WHERE CAN I GET ONE?!?!?!

    Two places have them that I know of.

    Blackwater firearms
    (They’ve got all sorts of product. They opened a few weeks ago and most people don’t know about them. Picked up a bunch of mags from them too)
    :em01:

    And the place I got my AR is Milford Firearms LLC He’s the one I talked to today about my scope mount and flip up sights. (He’s been getting the runaround from his supplier and is pissed)
    :em01:
    angrywebmaster recently posted..Feinstein’s Anti-gun bill is readyMy Profile

  14. 14
    angrywebmaster growls and barks:

    FYI

    Here is the list of evil things Senator Thundercunt wants banned.

    List of firearms prohibited by name
    Rifles: All AK types, including the following: AK, AK47, AK47S, AK–74, AKM, AKS, ARM, MAK90, MISR, NHM90, NHM91, Rock River Arms LAR–47, SA85, SA93, Vector Arms AK–47, VEPR, WASR–10, and WUM, IZHMASH Saiga AK, MAADI AK47 and ARM, Norinco 56S, 56S2, 84S, and 86S, Poly Technologies AK47 and AKS; All AR types, including the following: AR–10, AR–15, Armalite M15 22LR Carbine, Armalite M15–T, Barrett REC7, Beretta AR–70, Bushmaster ACR, Bushmaster Carbon 15, Bushmaster MOE series, Bushmaster XM15, Colt Match Target Rifles, DoubleStar AR rifles, DPMS Tactical Rifles, Heckler & Koch MR556, Olympic Arms, Remington R–15 rifles, Rock River Arms LAR–15, Sig Sauer SIG516 rifles, Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles, Stag Arms AR rifles, Sturm, Ruger & Co. SR556 rifles; Barrett M107A1; Barrett M82A1; Beretta CX4 Storm; Calico Liberty Series; CETME Sporter; Daewoo K–1, K–2, Max 1, Max 2, AR 100, and AR 110C; Fabrique Nationale/FN Herstal FAL, LAR, 22 FNC, 308 Match, L1A1 Sporter, PS90, SCAR, and FS2000; Feather Industries AT–9; Galil Model AR and Model ARM; Hi-Point Carbine; HK–91, HK–93, HK–94, HK–PSG–1 and HK USC; Kel-Tec Sub–2000, SU–16, and RFB; SIG AMT, SIG PE–57, Sig Sauer SG 550, and Sig Sauer SG 551; Springfield Armory SAR–48; Steyr AUG; Sturm, Ruger Mini-14 Tactical Rife M–14/20CF; All Thompson rifles, including the following: Thompson M1SB, Thompson T1100D, Thompson T150D, Thompson T1B, Thompson T1B100D, Thompson T1B50D, Thompson T1BSB, Thompson T1–C, Thompson T1D, Thompson T1SB, Thompson T5, Thompson T5100D, Thompson TM1, Thompson TM1C; UMAREX UZI Rifle; UZI Mini Carbine, UZI Model A Carbine, and UZI Model B Carbine; Valmet M62S, M71S, and M78; Vector Arms UZI Type; Weaver Arms Nighthawk; Wilkinson Arms Linda Carbine.
    Pistols: All AK–47 types, including the following: Centurion 39 AK pistol, Draco AK–47 pistol, HCR AK–47 pistol, IO Inc. Hellpup AK–47 pistol, Krinkov pistol, Mini Draco AK–47 pistol, Yugo Krebs Krink pistol; All AR–15 types, including the following: American Spirit AR–15 pistol, Bushmaster Carbon 15 pistol, DoubleStar Corporation AR pistol, DPMS AR–15 pistol, Olympic Arms AR–15 pistol, Rock River Arms LAR 15 pistol; Calico Liberty pistols; DSA SA58 PKP FAL pistol; Encom MP–9 and MP–45; Heckler & Koch model SP-89 pistol; Intratec AB–10, TEC–22 Scorpion, TEC–9, and TEC–DC9; Kel-Tec PLR 16 pistol; The following MAC types: MAC–10, MAC–11; Masterpiece Arms MPA A930 Mini Pistol, MPA460 Pistol, MPA Tactical Pistol, and MPA Mini Tactical Pistol; Military Armament Corp. Ingram M–11, Velocity Arms VMAC; Sig Sauer P556 pistol; Sites Spectre; All Thompson types, including the following: Thompson TA510D, Thompson TA5; All UZI types, including: Micro-UZI.
    Shotguns: Franchi LAW–12 and SPAS 12; All IZHMASH Saiga 12 types, including the following: IZHMASH Saiga 12, IZHMASH Saiga 12S, IZHMASH Saiga 12S EXP–01, IZHMASH Saiga 12K, IZHMASH Saiga 12K–030, IZHMASH Saiga 12K–040 Taktika; Streetsweeper; Striker 12.
    Belt-fed semiautomatic firearms: All belt-fed semiautomatic firearms including TNW M2HB
    angrywebmaster recently posted..About enforcing those gun laws SparkyMy Profile

  15. 15
    Cougar1978 growls and barks:

    Hey, Senator C#ntsniff, how in the hell do you think you’re going to get crooks, gangsters or terrorists to comply, let alone close to 100 Million Firearms owners? Yeah, good fucking luck enforcing that edict, you slathering whore! Remember, FAST AND FURIOUS? THAT didn’t work neolithic cum-dumpster!

    Oh, and on a side note, best of luck getting Texas to comply! Does COME AND TAKE IT ring a bell, Bitch?

  16. 16
    LC Moriarty, Imperial Goatherd growls and barks:

    Folks… Fuckstain has to get this through the Senate first. There is every indication that she had this one on the shelf for the better part of a decade, waiting for the right moment. Everyone points to Obama, the Senate Democrat majority and Sandy Hook as “the perfect storm” that pressed this to the fore.

    Hold on a second.

    The House remains firmly in Republican hands and a fairly pro-gun (albeit horrendous) Dingy Harry runs the Senate. The media has flayed everything in sight but, alas, can’t work up the feeding frenzy of 1994, when the economy was good, there was no talk of trillion dollar coinage to relieve our debt, we didn’t have an out-of-the-closet Marxist in the White House and the AR-15 wasn’t the most popular rifle in the country.

    Now we have talk of placing firearms “in common use” on the NFA registry and making them nontransferable on the death of the owner? That isn’t even the case for machine guns.

    If you think there’s a bit of desperation here on Feinstein’s part, you’re right. She’s 79 and this is probably her last term in the Senate. Local sources tell me of her West Shore Lake Tahoe “cabin” and boat docks (mysteriously built without need to conform to all those pesky Tahoe Regional Planning Agency regulations) that is nearly ready to receive her. It’s now or never and I think she realizes that things aren’t going to look any more opportune for her “legacy.”

    This thing is going to be shredded in the Senate. I have no doubt, however, that something will pass if only to save face.

    Then we come to the House. The people who get re-elected every two years. Right now, there’s good reason to think that a renewed AW ban wouldn’t get out of committee. Carolyn McCarthy’s mag ban may have a better chance, but not by too much.

    This is the “sling-as-much-shit-as-possible-and-hope-something-sticks” gambit.

  17. 17
    LC Gladiator growls and barks:

    BREAKING NEWS:
    Feinstein, Dems Move To Ban Guns.
    Sign the Petition Supporting Your Rights!

    banned arms

    As promised President Obama and the liberal statists are taking swift action to ban guns and restrict the constitutional rights of Americans. Senate Democrats have now unveiled their plan to expand the definition of prohibited “assault” weapons and reduce the legal limit for magazine capacity to nine rounds. One thing is certain, our Second Amendment gun rights are squarely in Obama’s crosshairs – and sweeping changes and restrictions are now before Congress.

    Grassfire has launched a grassroots petition to mobilize 100,000 patriots who are challenging Washington lawmakers’ aggressive push to undermine and restrict your Second Amendment rights. Grassfire will hand-deliver these petitions to the White House, the Vice President and key members of Congress in the coming days in a massive grassroots demonstration of support for our Second Amendment rights.

    Petition States:
    As an American citizen, with God-given constitutional rights, I reject any and all efforts by the Obama administration and Congress to restrict and diminish my Second Amendment rights. The heart-wrenching violence in Connecticut, Colorado and other areas of the nation are terrible and unfortunate, and I support efforts to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those who are mentally ill. However, restricting guns of any kind from law-abiding citizens is an assault on my rights as an American that cannot and will not be tolerated.

    I urge members of Congress not to attempt to legislate away my Second Amendment rights, and I challenge you to live up to your sworn oath and work diligently to protect those rights.

  18. 18
    HempRopeAndStreetlight growls and barks:

    I agree with the “throw shit at the wall” statement.

    The key to remember is fucking ANYTHING is Goddamned intolerable. These assholes think I have to go to a gun-dealer to give a pistol to my niece and nephews? They think they have the right to tell me what kind of magazines I can own?

    It seems to me they have come to some down right dangerous conclusions as to what the constitution allows. It would be a damn shame if patriots have to rectify their delusions.

    These assholes got another thing coming if they thing we will stand for any infringements – PERIOD. Keep your weapons at hand, clean, loaded, and NOW is the time for logistics work, and recon.

    Recon and planning, recon and planning, recon and planning, then rehearse it.

  19. 19
    HoundOfDoom growls and barks:

    Ah! She fears the Saiga. Good.

  20. 20
    Fa Cube Itches growls and barks:

    angrywebmaster @ #:

    Rank and file troops in most cases will not only refuse to follow that sort of order, they will remove the officer issuing it. Seems we had a discussion about this in 1946 in some place called Nuremberg I think.

    We had the discussion in Nuremberg precisely because so many soldiers were all too willing to follow those sorts of orders. The confirmation came in the subsequent Einsatzgruppen trials, the Treblinka trial, the Sobibor trial, the UN tribunals in the Former Republic of Yugoslavia, the UN tribunals in Rwanda, Sierra Leone, etc. Notably, there is one group that never seems to be subject to those sorts of trials – the Communists. They may always lose in the end, but they outscore everyone else in the league every season.

  21. 21
    LC Light29ID growls and barks:

    LC Moriarty, Imperial Goatherd @ #:

    Moriarity, I agree fully but it doesn’t make one damn bit of difference. Obongo is COUNTING on the Senate and the House to kill it, gut it, water it down or whatever euphemism you want to use. When it fails he’s going to do what hes planned all along and that’s an EO. Who’s going to stop him (legally speaking)? No one… and that’s the point. Before any court can see or hear a challenge he’s going to seize every gun in the gun shops (along with the ammo) and that will intimidate (so their thinking goes) enough sheeple that they will turn in THEIR guns.

    It isn’t the Feds kicking down your door but the FEAR of the Feds kicking down your door that there hanging their hat on.

  22. 22
    LC Light29ID growls and barks:

    angrywebmaster @ #:

    Wish I had the money but the kid might be able to finagle something. He went back to school and with his experience and combat record the VA is going to pour money (so he says) down his throat. But then again he’s got a whiff and my cute little granddaughter so I dunno what he can do. Being in NoVA I know I’m pretty much dead meat when SHTF but he could use it.

  23. 23
    Tallulah growls and barks:

    This bears repeating –

    When it fails he’s going to do what hes planned all along and that’s an EO. Who’s going to stop him (legally speaking)? No one… and that’s the point.

    Brace, brace, brace!

  24. 24
  25. 25
    HempRopeAndStreetlight growls and barks:

    It isn’t the Feds kicking down your door but the FEAR of the Feds kicking down your door that there hanging their hat on.

    Most of us ain’t scared to die. And are less scared to put Moose-grade ordinance through the first goon to charge through the door. And by through the door, I mean through the engine block of his goon-mobile, through his vest, through him, out the back, and into the goon sitting behind him where the rear trama plate MIGHT stop the bullet. I have my doubts to that fact. Mr. Lapua’s bite matches his bark. I hope we don’t have to find out.

    I’ve knocked an Elk over with a single shot.

    This won’t work out how they THINK it’s gonna work out.

    Good.

  26. 26
    LC Old Dog growls and barks:

    I claim nothing, I admit nothing. My only comment is check out the Tag Line at the top of my Blog!
    :em03:
    LC Old Dog recently posted..Pa. Steps Up To the Plate.My Profile

  27. 27
    LC Xystus growls and barks:

    @1.
    The “M1 Carbine (introduced in 1944…” flags this as a repost. It actually came out in ’42.

    @4.
    Concerning this “shock quote”–& others–I’ll go with one of the so-called (Ferengi) Rules of Acquisition from STDS9: Hear all. Trust nothing.

    @21.
    If that’s how these bloody statists think, they’d better think again! The fools may as well ban civilian possession of those scary Highland bagpipes, as the British government did in the 18th century due to rebel proclivities. Pipes, offline, are my main weapon, & I’d be happy to turn mine against the FedGov.

    Meanwhile I’ve signed the Patriot Post petition & ordered a copy of Resistance to Tyranny, plus a few other possibly relevant books.

  28. 28
    LC Gladiator growls and barks:

    angrywebmaster says:

    Rank and file troops in most cases will not only refuse to follow that sort of order, they will remove the officer issuing it.

    That didnt seem to be the case at Ruby Ridge or Waco.

  29. 29

    LC Gladiator @ #28: This goes to a whole new level.
    LC cmblake6, Imperial Black Ops Technician recently posted..This is one of those Congressional newsletter thingiesMy Profile

  30. 30
    LC Draco growls and barks:

    LC Gladiator @ #:

    I have some insight into Waco…I know SF Snipers (no, I will not release what Group) that were there…..
    LC Draco recently posted..The new SOF: Special Operations FitnessMy Profile


Other websites that have referenced this:

(Always a sign of good taste -- especially since they bothered to link to us) Go Check them out
  1. The Text of “The Intolerable Act”
  2. UPDATED 113TH HOUSE/SENATE CONTACT LISTS & MORE! | LadyRaven's Whisky In A Jar – OH!
  3. UPDATED 113TH HOUSE/SENATE CONTACT LISTS & MORE! | Grumpy Opinions