For Your Tuesday Afternoon Amusement

We think that this is an old skit from the Fox News “Half Hour News Hour”, there’s a little logo in the beginning and all, but we’re not quite sure.

After all, it sounds like it came straight off an OgabeMedia infomercial.


We’ll be checking to make sure that this is not an ABC “news” report. In the meantime, have at it in the comments.



  1. 1

    Every GFZ sign should be ?t=1318190016″ rel=”nofollow”>accompanied by this sign.

  2. 2
    LC Stargazer growls and barks:

    Yep, that was HHNH. Saw it on the show the first time it came out. This does indeed seem to be the thought mental burning-sawdust-in-the-head process that the gun-grabbers are using.

  3. 3

    “Target Rich Environment”.

  4. 4
    readerjp growls and barks:

    Another video for your amusement.

    What rock did they pull this hag out from under?

  5. 5
    Tallulah growls and barks:

    OT, but please check this out and pass it on: Colony Bay Productions, a patriotic, shoestring producer, is trying to continue with their web series, “Courage, New Hampshire,” about the years leading to the American Revolution. It has been called “the first TEA Party drama series.”

    Now they’re drastically short of funding (they have a micro-budget, and actors donating their skills out of patriotism). Please check out their episodes online, and if you find them worthy, consider sending them some help, and passing the word along to other patriots.

    If they can’t raise $20,000, they’ll have to suspend production. If you can pass it on to other likeminded blogs, please do.

    I’m not connected to them in any way; I just would hate to see a good, patriotic series go under for lack of support.

    Thanks, y’all.

  6. 6
    LC Xystus growls and barks:

    Yeah, I remember this; coulda been posted right here a few years ago.

  7. 7
    LC LOBO growls and barks:

    Wonder how they’ll spin this one, Romney camp asks Va. to probe voter forms

    Justin Riemer, the State Board of Elections’ deputy secretary, said forms have been sent by the group to deceased infants, out-of-state family members, and non-U.S. citizens, among others.

    In a letter this month, the State Board of Elections asked the group to cease pre-populating their forms and raised questions about how the group was obtaining lists of registered voters, citing the errant forms.

    Riemer noted that pre-populating the forms violates rules set forth in the state code and the Virginia Constitution requiring that voters fill out their own forms.

    On Monday, the Voter Participation Center responded to the Sunday Times-Dispatch story, stating in a letter on its website that “imperfections in the VPC vendors’ lists — while regrettable and unfortunate — should not be the reason or the excuse to call an entire process that is working into question.”

    Errr, the fact that your flat out violating the state code and state Constitution is NOT a reason to stop ????

  8. 8
    VonZorch Imperial Researcher growls and barks:

    Sure it’s working properly, It’s providing lots of fraudulent votes for the Demonrats.

  9. 9
    LC LOBO growls and barks:

    Even more…..Drug money funding voter fraud in Kentucky. And as I’ve said for years, both fucking parties need to go.

  10. 10

    Tha Fed,, is getting audited?
    The RP folks will be insufferable,, I mean,, more than the usual..

  11. 11

    On a plus note, came into some unexpected funds today. Expect new GUN PR0N™ to be posted soon!

    About to be the proud papa of a brand new Springfield XDs sub-compact .45! The punch of a 45, in a package smaller than most .380s!

    On the downside the Imperial Sniper™ is claiming my XD45 service model as her new carry weapon. Naw, nevermind, that’s not a downside.

  12. 12
    Weyland growls and barks:

    First there was the ‘gangsta’ method of holding a gun sideways while firing, ” rel=”nofollow”> now we just need to convince the misunderstood youths that this is the ‘gangsta’ way to load their gats.

  13. 13
    LC Gladiator growls and barks:

    Open thread post (Sorry I dont have a Link)

    By Matt Patterson (columnist – Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner)
    Government & Society:

    Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages.

    How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job?

    Imagine a future historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community organizer”; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote “present”); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

    He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor”; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama’s colleague and political sponsor.

    It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?

    Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day.

    But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberaldom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass – held to a lower standard – because of the color of his skin..

    Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

    Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon – affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

    Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow.

    Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist.

    Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin – that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t racism, then nothing is.

    And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate.

    All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.

    What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks?

    In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character.

    Those people – conservatives included – ought now to be deeply embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that’s when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all.

    Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years..

    And what about his character?

    Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles.

    Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess.

    It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence.

    But really, what were we to expect?

    The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

    In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job.

    When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office