Dumbest Defense of Mitch “Fwenchie” Daniels Yet
Writes RINOglican Apologist Avik Roy at NRO:
Conservatives who criticize Daniels for his stance on the right-to-work legislation remind me a bit of liberals who called Obama a coward for abandoning the public option in 2010. Obama said often that single-payer health care was his preferred approach, but that he simply didn’t have the votes for it in the Senate. Daniels is, unfortunately, in a similar position in Indiana.
OK, so the Fleebaggers ran away in spite of Mitch “No-Balls” Daniels already not having the votes if they were present?
Is it just us, or is that the dumbest thing we’ve heard since Lucius Aemilius Paullus and Gaius Terentius Varro yelled “never mind the flanks! Keep pushing the center back!”
Thatisall.



Categories:
Tags:
This is truly the funniest thing I have seen regarding the flee-bagging senators from my state.
http://www.wisgop.org/
Spot on Misha – I this over @ the NRO piece – worth saying here:
Um – okay – so then what you’re saying here is that the Dems fled the Legislature purely for SPITE, because Daniels didn’t have the votes to pass Right-to-Work in the first place – and that NOW Daniels is giving in on R-t-W because of that vote shortfall?
Or is it really the case that Daniels is giving in to the threat-carried-out by the Dems to bring their State to a complete standstill if they didn’t get their way – an act which should find them jobless for violating their respective oaths-of-office?
What SHOULD be happening right now is a concerted effort to have those ‘people’ removed from the office & duties that they are willfully & purposefully shirking. They were voted into office to represent voice of their constituencies IN session, IN the legislature – NOT to cripple the State government ‘because they can’.
If someone bombs a building and then says “Give me what I want or I’ll bomb another building” – and you give him what he wants, you’ve shown him that bombing buildings will get him what he wants and he’ll do it everytime he wants something.
THAT capitulation is what Daniels is committing – and, as a Wrong to be tallied, it stands FAR ahead of the Right-to-Work legislation itself.
THAT is the point to stay focused on.
– MD
Being from Indiana, I can say that I voted for Mitch Daniels. He was the better alternative. I say that because he has done some shit that makes a true conservative wonder about him.
He has been fairly responsible with the purse strings of the tax payers. And that is commendable. He has also had some good moments (like backing the property tax reform). But he has also had some moments where he seemed to be drinking the nanny state kool-aid (see the Healthy Indiana Plan). So, I’ve always thought of him as being a up one day and down the next.
But this shit about not being willing to get in the fight with the Dems is bad. It is indefensible in my opinion. He has had shades of this crap before with the whole “I don’t want to fight about the cultural issues” thing. But, he needs to figure out whose side he is on and who pays for the butter on his bread. The people who voted for him are the people who voted to send a Republican majority to the state capital. They set the arena for him to slug it out with the opposition and he is waffling. Not taking the fight to the Dems washes out the CPAC speech as far as I see it.
That doesn’t bode well for his political future as far as I’m concerned. I won’t vote for him in the primaries if he will not slug it out on the cultural issues and if he cannot see the light in financially crippling the opposition when he has the chance.
Here we have the governor’s own explanation (from here):
Don’t know if it makes y’all feel any better. I certainly don’t know how I feel about it, but he’s not my governor (no, I got Gov. Moonbeam, thanks in part to folks like my dad who didn’t think his opponent was “pure” enough).
he folded like a cheap umbrella.
Response to TheRoyalFamily @:
Again – point isn’t even about RTW or any of their other legislation.
It’s about capitulation to those who would willingly bring their own state to a grinding halt, if they don’t get their way.
They’re wrong for doing it – he’s wrong for letting it work.
– MD
LC MuscleDaddy says:
Tochno.
You show a weakness, the enemy will keep hitting you there again and again.
The Battle of Cannae?
Response to LC Xystus @:
Yeah.
So, going with the analogy, is there is hope that a young and unknown Scipio Africanus is watching this disaster?
[img]http://www.nrtw.org/images/us-map.gif[/img]
[img]http://www.mackinac.org/media/images/2008/hohmanRTW-chart2-sml.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.nrtw.org/files/nrtw/jobgrowthchart.JPG[/img]
http://www.nrtwc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Reagan-obama.png
[img]http://right-to-work-laws.johnwcooper.com/index-files-rtw/image002.jpg[/img]
That’s right. Since 1963 only three states have enacted right to work laws.
No state, having enacted right to work, has ever returned to the closed union shop fold.
Realizing this, starting the mid-1960′s unions and the Democratic party have spared no effort to defeat states attempting to enact right to work laws.
In the past 26 years, only one state – Oklahoma in 2001 – has managed to successfully convert itself from closed shop to right-to-work.
As we are seeing in Wisconsin and Indiana, unions and the Democrats will go to any length it takes to defeat right to work legislation.
Somber note for those of you who might be thinking the tide has turned, or think we’ve seen the limit of the depravity progressives will go to:
Right to work legislation has gone around 1 for 29 since 1963.
And the latest attempt in Indiana just blew up spectacularly.
Think about that for a minute.