Another New Civility™ Update

Here we have another member of the Pore Oppressed Unions™ telling a Tea Partier (you know, those racist, gay-hating, violent terrorists) that he’ll “fuck his mother” and “fuck you in the ass, you faggot” and that “you better get away from here.”

Gee, thanks. We’re certainly glad that the Ogabe Thugs show so much civility in order to teach us violent right-wing goons how civilized people behave themselves.

We’re positively shamed by the outpouring of reason, civility and well-mannered discourse put on display by that Ogabe Union Brownshirt. Beating up girls, curb-stomping invalids and sending them to the ICU…

So much to learn from them.

But we make you this promise: We’re taking notes and we ARE learning.

And we can’t wait for finals when we get to demonstrate our newly acquired skills to you leftist thugs. You’ll be proud of us, your humble students, proud beyond belief as you spend the rest of your lives drooling in a wheelchair and shitting into a bag taped to your abdomens.

Seriously: It’s time to quit this whole “meet violence with passive submission because We’re Better Than They Are™” nonsense. We didn’t start it, we just act in self-defense.

That is the only rule we need to follow: Don’t start anything but, if attacked, strike back harder.

“Treat me well, I’ll treat you better. Treat me bad, I’ll treat you worse.

You don’t gain “the moral high ground” by submitting and surrendering like a fwench surrender monkey until you’ve been utterly destroyed. And, besides, His Imperial Majesty doesn’t give much of a shit about that fabled Moral High Ground™ if occupying it means being buried there.

Again: Don’t start a fight, but make damn sure that you finish every single one you’re forced into! And use any level of force necessary to achieve that goal.

Pretty soon, the leftist fucks will get the message and become quite hesitant when it comes to picking on “easy” targets.

Backing off is nothing but reinforcing bad behavior which, to anybody with an IQ above 60, is nothing but an invitation to worse behavior.

This shit has to stop, and it’s better that it stop now rather than later, when the mess created as a result will be much, much worse. The confrontation is inevitable. With every “civil” response to aggressive behavior we’re only accelerating that process.

Better to nip it in the bud.

Thatisall.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
irish19
Member
irish19

Treat me well, I’ll treat you better. Treat me bad, I’ll treat you worse.

What a wonderful slogan for a bumper sticker or t-shirt.
And why is it these union fuckwads are never pulling this shit when I’m around. I need to get our more.

irish19
Member
irish19

A first!!? And a second!

LC Gunsniper
Member
LC Gunsniper

Even more ” rel=”nofollow”>civility!

Such lovable thugs, they are. :em72:

Sir George
Admin
Sir George

Yesterday a union thug hit Tabitha Hale, a FreedomWorks activist and blogger, and she has it on video.

LC Darth Scoundrel
Member

The high ground gives you a better firing position. That’s what we all need to remember about the fabled “high ground”, you want it because of the tactical advantage but if you aren’t going to use it, what’s the point?

Azygos
Member

How come these :em72: :em72: never pick on someone my size? Do you think being 6′ 3″ and 240 lbs might have something to do with it? :em93:

Terrapod
Member
Terrapod

280lbs/72″ = 3.88 lbs/inch
240lbs/75″ = 3.2 lbs/inch I still have an advantage on ya in mass applied to fist but you may have me on reach so you would get to the target a tad sooner with a smidge less power :em99:

LC Light29ID - The Imperial Asshole
Member

“They bring a knife you bring a gun. They put one of yours in the hospital you put one of theirs in the morgue”

Not a problem…guess who has the most guns 👿

VonZorch Imperial Researcher
Member
VonZorch Imperial Researcher

Keep the peace, come to rallies visibly armed.

LC LucysDaddy--Imperial Tire Warranty Expert
Member
LC LucysDaddy--Imperial Tire Warranty Expert

Terrapod says:

280lbs/72? = 3.88 lbs/inch
240lbs/75? = 3.2 lbs/inch I still have an advantage on ya in mass applied to fist but you may have me on reach so you would get to the target a tad sooner with a smidge less power

250 lbs/67″=3.73 pounds/inch. Short and stocky as fuck…but I pack a hell of a left cross!!!!11!!!1!

Let some union fuck take a poke at a woman while I am around…I will beat him like a rented mule.

MasterGuns Imperial Swampmaster
Member

Response to Terrapod @:
Damn…..210 and 73″ = 2,87/lb……no wonder I carry.

Semper Fi

MasterGuns Imperial Swampmaster
Member

Uh….erm….2.87 lbs/in

Semper Fi

LC Ohio Right Wing Nut
Member
LC Ohio Right Wing Nut

Terrapod says:

280lbs/72? = 3.88 lbs/inch
240lbs/75? = 3.2 lbs/inch I still have an advantage on ya in mass applied to fist but you may have me on reach so you would get to the target a tad sooner with a smidge less power

I’m 175/66=2.65…but the .40 I carry makes up for alot :em96:

ZeektheCruel
Member
ZeektheCruel

I don’t know the religious makeup of this group, but I am reminded of a set of teachings that have weighed heavily on me for the last couple of years: 38 You have heard that it has been said: An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. 39 But I say to you not to resist evil: but if one strike you on your right cheek, turn to him also the other: 40 And if a man will contend with you in judgment, and take away your coat, let go your cloak also unto him. 41 And… Read more »

Elephant Man
Member
Elephant Man

These days, I would have no problem hitting a woman. I know that this will rile you up no end, but if you are going to act like a man, expect to be treated like one. Act like a lady and you will be treated like a lady. It is a pretty simple concept. Okaaaaaay……. What exactly constitutes a “woman acting like a man”? Does it entail a woman actually striking you or will just “getting in your face” suffice? If a woman talks or dresses in a certain way, does that mean she’s “fair game” to get belted? At… Read more »

seagoon
Member
seagoon

Response to Elephant Man @: I think there is an important line here- woman/lady. I survived an attempted murder at the hands of a woman- she was sure as fuck no lady. To be fair, I disarmed her without striking her, but that wasn’t because of her gender but because she was the woman I loved. Now, I’m of the attitude that if you deserve slugging, you get slugged (not that I go around punching people, it’s just an attitude). Women wanted equality, they get it. That said, I can’t think of anything a lady could do to deserve punching,… Read more »

LC Xystus
Member

His Imperial Majesty doesn’t give much of a shit about that fabled Moral High Ground™ if occupying it means being buried there. Again: Don’t start a fight, but make damn sure that you finish every single one you’re forced into! And use any level of force necessary to achieve that goal. The HarangueOutan And what if I continued to stick that camera in your face?: Define “in your face.” How many yards must a videographer keep clear before it becomes virtual assault?! And who’s in fact advancing toward whom? You’d like that when you are intimidating someone with a camera,… Read more »

Elephant Man
Member
Elephant Man

Response to seagoon @: You brought up good points. I was raised with the notion that you don’t hit women, period. It’s part of the “standup guy” code of conduct. A woman can be as loud, obnoxious and “in my face” as she likes and I won’t respond by hitting her. However, I will respond by being just as loud, obnoxious and “in her face” in return. I will take a slap in the face and respond by saying something along the lines of “You’re f**king psycho” and walk away. (Unless I had blurted out something really vile to warrant… Read more »

Elephant Man
Member
Elephant Man

As a side note, if I was stuck on the planet Amazonia, I might have to rethink my last comment. :em99:

I’d also have to rethink defending myself from “threat of death” if it was “Death By Snoo Snoo“. :em01:

Lizard, G.L.O.R.
Member
Lizard, G.L.O.R.

So Deej please tell me why the people doing the following, who are paid with my tax dollars not be fired for not sticking to their syllabus? What is a Teach-Out? A teach-out is a work action that transforms the educational workplace. Teachers bring their classes into public settings and places and focus their day’s curriculum to cover a pressing social concern. The goal is to maintain our educational work and to disrupt the status quo, bringing attention to the issue and to our work as instructors. Our teach-out is an act of solidarity with our elected representatives who have… Read more »

lc purple raider
Member

In today’s climate and technology, it is easy for anyone with a camera and a microphone to be a “journalist”. It is just as easy to film something, cut and splice, then upload it to the ‘tube and create a controversy where none really existed. We saw the prime example with James O’Keefe and his Acorn Pimp film, and more recently with the fake Planned Parenthood pimp story. (what is it about the Right wing and their fascination with pimps anyways?) Any proof on the editing, or are you just talking out your ass again. Here is the thing: We… Read more »

Imperial Grammar Hun, G.L.O.R
Member

Lizard, G.L.O.R. says:

So if the class is a math class why the fuck are they discussing social concerns?

Liz, it’s the new education “across the curriculum” crap. Even the colleges and universities are doing it.

I could see it, though:

You have 1 oppressed union member being harassed by 1 young female with a camera. How many media people will it take to distort the story?

Lizard, G.L.O.R.
Member
Lizard, G.L.O.R.

Grammar Czar says: Lizard, G.L.O.R. says: So if the class is a math class why the fuck are they discussing social concerns? Liz, it’s the new education “across the curriculum” crap. Even the colleges and universities are doing it. I could see it, though: You have 1 oppressed union member being harassed by 1 young female with a camera. How many media people will it take to distort the story? I know about “across the curriculum” I had to learn about it when I was in college and used it somewhat in my classroom but since I mainly taught first… Read more »

LC TerribleTroy
Member
LC TerribleTroy

Response to Slightly to the right of Gingis Khan @: Thank You. The unionists went to the office of FreedomWorks to start some shit. Dont start no shit, wont be no shit. And the guy wants to get physical cause he’s being filmed and asked questions? What the guy should have done (from a legal perspective) is try to retreat from his “harassers” and if that didn’t provide relief, contact local Law enforcement. Thats it. Thats the legal remedy. There is NO REASONABLE FORCE allowance for this type of scenario (or for any “harassment scenario). Also this individual was in… Read more »

bruce
Member
bruce

this girl did not stick a camera in the thugs face dj she used a phone that makes it look closer than it is.dj only a punk hits a woman so never hit a woman because i might be there and slice you up with my switch blade razor.

LC Gunsniper
Member
LC Gunsniper

These days, I would have no problem hitting a woman.

Any particularly special about “these days”, Ike Turner?

LC Darth Scoundrel
Member

I was not asking for this. There was no confrontation between the thug and myself prior to this. He had not asked me to put the camera away. I was not as close as the video implies (it was cropped from a vertical iPhone video so it would fit on youtube). I was simply filming a protest, as I have done for the past two years. Amazingly enough, none of those crazy right wing extremists ever hit me.

DJ, your argument lacks merit, and your mommy should have taught you as a little boy not to hit girls. Next?

seagoon
Member
seagoon

Response to Elephant Man @:
All you say is fair enough- but for me, I guess I just don’t accept that anyone has an iron-clad shield to hide behind when they raise hell. Words, well words are words, and should not provoke violence- but I think that if the physical line is crossed then ‘don’t hit a girl (well, woman, since we must assume she’s of age and no lady)’ holds as little water as ‘don’t hit a guy with glasses’.