Another New Civility™ Update

Here we have another member of the Pore Oppressed Unions™ telling a Tea Partier (you know, those racist, gay-hating, violent terrorists) that he’ll “fuck his mother” and “fuck you in the ass, you faggot” and that “you better get away from here.”

Gee, thanks. We’re certainly glad that the Ogabe Thugs show so much civility in order to teach us violent right-wing goons how civilized people behave themselves.

We’re positively shamed by the outpouring of reason, civility and well-mannered discourse put on display by that Ogabe Union Brownshirt. Beating up girls, curb-stomping invalids and sending them to the ICU…

So much to learn from them.

But we make you this promise: We’re taking notes and we ARE learning.

And we can’t wait for finals when we get to demonstrate our newly acquired skills to you leftist thugs. You’ll be proud of us, your humble students, proud beyond belief as you spend the rest of your lives drooling in a wheelchair and shitting into a bag taped to your abdomens.

Seriously: It’s time to quit this whole “meet violence with passive submission because We’re Better Than They Are™” nonsense. We didn’t start it, we just act in self-defense.

That is the only rule we need to follow: Don’t start anything but, if attacked, strike back harder.

“Treat me well, I’ll treat you better. Treat me bad, I’ll treat you worse.

You don’t gain “the moral high ground” by submitting and surrendering like a fwench surrender monkey until you’ve been utterly destroyed. And, besides, His Imperial Majesty doesn’t give much of a shit about that fabled Moral High Ground™ if occupying it means being buried there.

Again: Don’t start a fight, but make damn sure that you finish every single one you’re forced into! And use any level of force necessary to achieve that goal.

Pretty soon, the leftist fucks will get the message and become quite hesitant when it comes to picking on “easy” targets.

Backing off is nothing but reinforcing bad behavior which, to anybody with an IQ above 60, is nothing but an invitation to worse behavior.

This shit has to stop, and it’s better that it stop now rather than later, when the mess created as a result will be much, much worse. The confrontation is inevitable. With every “civil” response to aggressive behavior we’re only accelerating that process.

Better to nip it in the bud.

Thatisall.

28 comments

  1. 1
    irish19 growls and barks:

    Treat me well, I’ll treat you better. Treat me bad, I’ll treat you worse.

    What a wonderful slogan for a bumper sticker or t-shirt.
    And why is it these union fuckwads are never pulling this shit when I’m around. I need to get our more.

  2. 2
    irish19 growls and barks:

    A first!!? And a second!

  3. 3
    LC Gunsniper growls and barks:

    Even more ” rel=”nofollow”>civility!

    Such lovable thugs, they are. :em72:

  4. 4
    Sir George growls and barks:

    Yesterday a union thug hit Tabitha Hale, a FreedomWorks activist and blogger, and she has it on video.

  5. 5
    LC Darth Scoundrel growls and barks:

    The high ground gives you a better firing position. That’s what we all need to remember about the fabled “high ground”, you want it because of the tactical advantage but if you aren’t going to use it, what’s the point?

  6. 6
    Library Czar growls and barks:

    How come these :em72: :em72: never pick on someone my size? Do you think being 6′ 3″ and 240 lbs might have something to do with it? :em93:

  7. 7
    Terrapod growls and barks:

    280lbs/72″ = 3.88 lbs/inch
    240lbs/75″ = 3.2 lbs/inch I still have an advantage on ya in mass applied to fist but you may have me on reach so you would get to the target a tad sooner with a smidge less power :em99:

  8. 8
    Light29ID growls and barks:

    “They bring a knife you bring a gun. They put one of yours in the hospital you put one of theirs in the morgue”

    Not a problem…guess who has the most guns 👿

  9. 9
    VonZorch Imperial Researcher growls and barks:

    Keep the peace, come to rallies visibly armed.

  10. 10
    LC LucysDaddy--Imperial Tire Provider growls and barks:

    Terrapod says:

    280lbs/72? = 3.88 lbs/inch
    240lbs/75? = 3.2 lbs/inch I still have an advantage on ya in mass applied to fist but you may have me on reach so you would get to the target a tad sooner with a smidge less power

    250 lbs/67″=3.73 pounds/inch. Short and stocky as fuck…but I pack a hell of a left cross!!!!11!!!1!

    Let some union fuck take a poke at a woman while I am around…I will beat him like a rented mule.

  11. 11
    MasterGuns Imperial Swampmaster growls and barks:

    Response to Terrapod @:
    Damn…..210 and 73″ = 2,87/lb……no wonder I carry.

    Semper Fi

  12. 12
    MasterGuns Imperial Swampmaster growls and barks:

    Uh….erm….2.87 lbs/in

    Semper Fi

  13. 13
    Lc ORWN engine builder for Rottie Racing growls and barks:

    Terrapod says:

    280lbs/72? = 3.88 lbs/inch
    240lbs/75? = 3.2 lbs/inch I still have an advantage on ya in mass applied to fist but you may have me on reach so you would get to the target a tad sooner with a smidge less power

    I’m 175/66=2.65…but the .40 I carry makes up for alot :em96:

  14. 14
    ZeektheCruel growls and barks:

    I don’t know the religious makeup of this group, but I am reminded of a set of teachings that have weighed heavily on me for the last couple of years:

    38 You have heard that it has been said: An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. 39 But I say to you not to resist evil: but if one strike you on your right cheek, turn to him also the other: 40 And if a man will contend with you in judgment, and take away your coat, let go your cloak also unto him. 41 And whosoever will force you one mile, go with him other two. 42 Give to him that asks of you, and from him that would borrow of you turn not away.

    43 You have heard that it has been said, You shall love your neighbor, and hate your enemy. 44 But I say to you, Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and calumniate you: 45 That you may be the children of your Father who is in heaven, who makes his sun to rise upon the good, and bad, and rains upon the just and the unjust. 46 For if you love them that love you, what reward shall you have? Do not even the publicans this? 47 And if you salute your brethren only, what do you more? Do not also the heathens this? 48 Be therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect.

    For a site that packs a Christian symbol, we need to remind ourselves of His teaching. And for a site that sidelines the words “Deus Vult”, we should ask ourselves who the better judge of God’s will was…Jesus or Urban the 2nd.

    Don’t hate them. They will stand along side you when we are judged.

    For the record…I am a sinner because it galls me sometimes to forgive these communist bastards. I despise them to the trench they should all be machine gunned into and buried in.

    I ask God’s forgiveness.

    I am reminded of a quote though:

    “I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever.”

    Our nation is about to pay I fear.

    His will be done. Even if I thought myself big enough…He’d just wear me down in the end. His will be done and His judgment be acknowledged when it is rendered.

  15. 15
    Elephant Man growls and barks:

    These days, I would have no problem hitting a woman. I know that this will rile you up no end, but if you are going to act like a man, expect to be treated like one. Act like a lady and you will be treated like a lady. It is a pretty simple concept.

    Okaaaaaay…….

    What exactly constitutes a “woman acting like a man”?

    Does it entail a woman actually striking you or will just “getting in your face” suffice?

    If a woman talks or dresses in a certain way, does that mean she’s “fair game” to get belted?

    At what point are you “intimidated” by a woman enough that you feel the need to hit her?

    You might want to clarify because your statement as it stands is making you veer dangerously close to “sniveling punkass” territory.

    And no, I’m not “riled up”. I’m just curious.

    Myself, it would take a sustained physical assault before I would hit a woman.

    Jamming a camera in my face and being obnoxious would be annoying as hell but hardly “intimidating” to me.

  16. 16
    seagoon growls and barks:

    Response to Elephant Man @:
    I think there is an important line here- woman/lady. I survived an attempted murder at the hands of a woman- she was sure as fuck no lady. To be fair, I disarmed her without striking her, but that wasn’t because of her gender but because she was the woman I loved.

    Now, I’m of the attitude that if you deserve slugging, you get slugged (not that I go around punching people, it’s just an attitude). Women wanted equality, they get it. That said, I can’t think of anything a lady could do to deserve punching, and frankly for me to punch anyone requires them to raise their hand first. It’s not a gender thing- size is irrelevant- I’m sure that N@ could make catfood out of me (and feed it to the kittehs) no problem. It’s a cultural role thing- gentlemen don’t hit ladies.

    All of this said, I haven’t seen the vid- am stuck behind the GFW and it won’t display. I’ll assume from the discussion here that the guy was not physically assaulted, and though I don’t know about other provocations I’ll assume he was in the wrong- but he’d be as much in the wrong if he’d assaulted a guy.

    Not saying that she did this (I’ll take your collective word she didn’t) but I don’t believe that gender trumps consequences for your actions- you provoke a fight, you should be prepared to fight it, regardless of your sex.

  17. 17
    LC Xystus growls and barks:

    His Imperial Majesty doesn’t give much of a shit about that fabled Moral High Ground™ if occupying it means being buried there.

    Again: Don’t start a fight, but make damn sure that you finish every single one you’re forced into! And use any level of force necessary to achieve that goal.

    :em69: :em69: :em69:

    The HarangueOutan

    And what if I continued to stick that camera in your face?:

    Define “in your face.” How many yards must a videographer keep clear before it becomes virtual assault?! And who’s in fact advancing toward whom?

    You’d like that when you are intimidating someone with a camera, wouldn’t you? To cause a person to leave through your intimidation. A thug calling someone else a thug. Sheese.

    Get it, people? Cameras are intimidating weapons. You’re a thug if you use one!

    I probably would have grabbed the camera and tossed it away, myself. Fuck all of the niceties of having to explain beforehand what he might do to a person if they didn’t get that camera out of his face. All that does is waste time.

    It’s so much easier to escalate things rather than just leave well enough alone–& it’s always the better legal option too. Really, our ITW goes so far out of the way to defend the wrong, the only thinking it makes us do is thinking he looks like a dope. Or, I suppose, he could be doing a good impression of a lamestream mediot, for whom no thinking’s necessary: Dems/labor good, opposition/conservatives bad. Just fill in the template. Heads I win, tails you lose.

    DJ’s apologetics would seem to justify (for example) Tea Partiers attacking professional camera crews & the reporters they rode in on. Of course, the Idiotarians’ arguments are never reversible. Their dung smells like roses, & a bird or plane can fly with only one wing, so long as it’s on the left!

    Regarding ZeektheCruel’s sermonette: wouldn’t it be nice if Je$$e Ja¢%$on preached the Gospel to his pals?

  18. 18
    Elephant Man growls and barks:

    Response to seagoon @:

    You brought up good points.

    I was raised with the notion that you don’t hit women, period.

    It’s part of the “standup guy” code of conduct.

    A woman can be as loud, obnoxious and “in my face” as she likes and I won’t respond by hitting her.

    However, I will respond by being just as loud, obnoxious and “in her face” in return.

    I will take a slap in the face and respond by saying something along the lines of “You’re f**king psycho” and walk away. (Unless I had blurted out something really vile to warrant a slap in the face whereupon I’d respond with an apology, especially if she was a friend)

    On the other hand, if confronted by a sustained physical assault, the threat of death or serious bodily harm, you have to defend yourself and do what’s necessary.

  19. 19
    Elephant Man growls and barks:

    As a side note, if I was stuck on the planet Amazonia, I might have to rethink my last comment. :em99:

    I’d also have to rethink defending myself from “threat of death” if it was “Death By Snoo Snoo“. :em01:

  20. 20
    Lizard, G.L.O.R. growls and barks:

    So Deej please tell me why the people doing the following, who are paid with my tax dollars not be fired for not sticking to their syllabus?

    What is a Teach-Out?
    A teach-out is a work action that transforms the educational workplace. Teachers bring their classes into public settings and places and focus their day’s curriculum to cover a pressing social concern. The goal is to maintain our educational work and to disrupt the status quo, bringing attention to the issue and to our work as instructors.

    Our teach-out is an act of solidarity with our elected representatives who have left the state to protect us from a bill that would eliminate our rights to fair representation and a democratic process, and with the tens of thousands of people from around the state who continue to peacefully demonstrate at the Capitol.

    Why a Teach-Out?
    Membership of the Milwaukee Graduate Assistants’ Association voted on February 18 to call for “teach-outs” starting on Tuesday, Feb. 22, to protest the reconvening of the State Assembly and Governor Scott Walker’s planned statement about his budget. In addition, our sisters and brothers in the Teaching Assistants Association at UW-Madison have called for continuing teach-outs on their campus.

    The Assembly is expected to pass the union-busting budget repair bill, even as tens of thousands of people demonstrate against the anti-worker provisions in the bill. Scott Fitzgerald, the Senate Majority Leader, has also indicated that the Senate will convene to pass non-fiscal measures, which they do not need the Senate Democrats to pass and which would put additional pressure on Senate Democrats to return to the Capitol.

    We are calling for a teach-out rather than a walk-out because we do not want to be forced to return to “business as usual,” as it were. We continue to call for instructors to use their discretion to cancel classes, reschedule them or hold them off campus. We are calling on action from teaching assistants, research assistants, project assistants and professors

    So if the class is a math class why the fuck are they discussing social concerns?

  21. 21
    lc purple raider growls and barks:

    In today’s climate and technology, it is easy for anyone with a camera and a microphone to be a “journalist”. It is just as easy to film something, cut and splice, then upload it to the ‘tube and create a controversy where none really existed. We saw the prime example with James O’Keefe and his Acorn Pimp film, and more recently with the fake Planned Parenthood pimp story. (what is it about the Right wing and their fascination with pimps anyways?)

    Any proof on the editing, or are you just talking out your ass again.

    Here is the thing: We see what we think is the beginning of this “interview”. We aren’t treated with the events just prior to what is shown on the camera. We just see from when the video starts, not from when the “interview” starts. The clue here is when the “interviewer” says, “So this is how you resort to some kind of intelligent debate…” We don’t know what happened just before this video cuts in. I am suspecting that the protester told them to leave him alone (or something to that effect). I don’t know, because the person presenting the video doesn’t want us to know. They deliberately cut us in at this point because it tells the story THEY want us to see, in the context that they intend.

    As Perry Mason used to say, you have no evidence, and without no evidence, you have no case.

    Just like you have no evidence of the Koch brothers, or no evidence of Obama’s birth certificate.

  22. 22
    Grammar Czar growls and barks:

    Lizard, G.L.O.R. says:

    So if the class is a math class why the fuck are they discussing social concerns?

    Liz, it’s the new education “across the curriculum” crap. Even the colleges and universities are doing it.

    I could see it, though:

    You have 1 oppressed union member being harassed by 1 young female with a camera. How many media people will it take to distort the story?

  23. 23
    Lizard, G.L.O.R. growls and barks:

    Grammar Czar says:

    Lizard, G.L.O.R. says:
    So if the class is a math class why the fuck are they discussing social concerns?
    Liz, it’s the new education “across the curriculum” crap. Even the colleges and universities are doing it.
    I could see it, though:
    You have 1 oppressed union member being harassed by 1 young female with a camera. How many media people will it take to distort the story?

    :em01:

    I know about “across the curriculum” I had to learn about it when I was in college and used it somewhat in my classroom but since I mainly taught first grade felt that reading, writing and arithmatic were my priorities. The way I saw it, if they couldn’t read, write, and do math it really didn’t matter if they could tell you about their community(social studies curriculum) or about global warming(science crap).

    I am just highly annoyed that these college level, tax paid idiots would openly state that they are committing job action but not abandoning their job.

    Oh and 2 school districts have already sent out warning of layoff slips in WI, one of the recipients was the wife of a Rep. State Senator.

    http://www.wisn.com/news/26990647/detail.html

  24. 24
    LC TerribleTroy growls and barks:

    Response to Slightly to the right of Gingis Khan @:

    Thank You. The unionists went to the office of FreedomWorks to start some shit. Dont start no shit, wont be no shit.

    And the guy wants to get physical cause he’s being filmed and asked questions? What the guy should have done (from a legal perspective) is try to retreat from his “harassers” and if that didn’t provide relief, contact local Law enforcement. Thats it. Thats the legal remedy. There is NO REASONABLE FORCE allowance for this type of scenario (or for any “harassment scenario). Also this individual was in public, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in public. One doesn’t need permission to photograph or audiotape or videotape anything that is occurring in public. So the whole “they should have asked permission” schtick is just a crock of shit. Just like this guys behavior. Unless one is under reasonable threat of imminent physical harm one cannot touch another in a “aggressive” manner.

  25. 25
    bruce growls and barks:

    this girl did not stick a camera in the thugs face dj she used a phone that makes it look closer than it is.dj only a punk hits a woman so never hit a woman because i might be there and slice you up with my switch blade razor.

  26. 26
    LC Gunsniper growls and barks:

    These days, I would have no problem hitting a woman.

    Any particularly special about “these days”, Ike Turner?

  27. 27
    LC Darth Scoundrel growls and barks:

    I was not asking for this. There was no confrontation between the thug and myself prior to this. He had not asked me to put the camera away. I was not as close as the video implies (it was cropped from a vertical iPhone video so it would fit on youtube). I was simply filming a protest, as I have done for the past two years. Amazingly enough, none of those crazy right wing extremists ever hit me.

    DJ, your argument lacks merit, and your mommy should have taught you as a little boy not to hit girls. Next?

  28. 28
    seagoon growls and barks:

    Response to Elephant Man @:
    All you say is fair enough- but for me, I guess I just don’t accept that anyone has an iron-clad shield to hide behind when they raise hell. Words, well words are words, and should not provoke violence- but I think that if the physical line is crossed then ‘don’t hit a girl (well, woman, since we must assume she’s of age and no lady)’ holds as little water as ‘don’t hit a guy with glasses’.