The Lawless Department Of In-justice

Vote fraud is one of those things that stirs up a white-hot fury in me. I’m sick and fucking tired of hearing that there hasn’t been “any widespread proof that vote fraud occurs” therefore we don’t need positive ID to vote. That has to be one of the most dishonest statements in history. We have every example of vote fraud, but for whatever partisan reasons, serious investigations have NOT occurred, to prove or disprove it exists. The left has a near lock on devising dozens of ways to pull this off and it’s no filthy, dirty or more blatant tricks, holds barred. Jumpin Jeebus on a nuklar pogo stick, this shit infuriates me. We had a recent SCOTUS ruling affirming that states have the right to require positive ID to ensure the integrity of this most critical of our obligations as citizens. But the Holder DoJ is having none of it. They’re busily litigating against any state that decides to enact their own voter ID laws. Yes, federal law requires a process for the DoJ to review voting law changes from any state to ensure they do not impede anyone from exercising their rights. Every damned time this is done, it’s ‘found’ that monolithic democrat voting blocs are being discriminated against, it’s always the poor, minorities, under-privileged folks being impacted by evil republican machinations. Regardless of SCOTUS rulings the completely lawless DoJ marches on, attacking states’ rights. Today’s new target is the Republic of Texas.

I’m gonna dust off the wayback Fisk Machine© and have a go at these bastards. Grab a coffee this is a mite-long.

Justice Department Opposes Texas Voter ID Law

The reason naturally for a border state is disenfranchising the hispanic vote, which just happens to be a group that is moving away from the dems, odd that eh? Let’s have few selected tidbits out of this one.

The Justice Department’s civil rights division on Monday objected to a new photo ID requirement for voters in Texas because many Hispanic voters lack state-issued identification.

This theme will run throughout this whole damned lie of an article. Many Hispanic voters in Texas don’t have state issued ID because they ARE NOT eligible for it, by virtue of their immigration status. They aren’t permitted to even be here, let alone exercise rights of citizens, for shit sakes. It’s all that simple. The left just can’t abide not having a potential group of generational voters that would easily respond to their all-free, all-the-time, cradle-to-grave government designs. This group has always had a hard time understanding our culture with no prospects of improving that understanding through efforts by the left to keep them from assimilating. The left just loves to create those slaves you know. Find a group, victimize them, make sure they are perpetually aggrieved with demagoguery and keep them beholden with ‘free’ shit they get from you and your fellow slave-masters. Those other fat-cats are just out for themselves.

Texas follows South Carolina as the second state in recent months to become embroiled in a court battle with the Justice Department over new photo ID requirements for voters.

Just the first few targets on the DoJ hit list, not to worry, they will go after any state that has the balls to challenge Teh Won’s ideology. That is the real reason for constant pressure used in effort to grind down the states that don’t buy into the statists’ bullshit. It, sure as hell, is NOT all about voting, it’s about surrendering our sovreignity under the constitution. Practically, the constitution and our natural rights, is under attack from every quarter on the left. The document is a major impediment to achieving their Utopia©, dependent on a unified government.

Photo ID laws have become a point of contention in the 2012 elections. Liberal groups have said the requirements are the product of Republican-controlled state governments and are aimed at disenfranchising people who tend to vote Democratic — African-Americans, Hispanics, people of low-income and college students.(Emph Mine)

Toldja so. Even they admit that it benefits their side. Even it was about justice for all, it should be about everyone, so why don’t drop the pretense in your ‘objections’. They just included college students in the list for blatant pandering. I’m pretty convinced that students all have drivers’ licenses and that’s just fine here for registering.

Proponents of such legislation say the measures are aimed at combating voter fraud.

Projection much? You posed that these laws impact left leaning voters, than by implication it’s to combat republican supported voting fraud. How many republican supported voting fraud incidents have occured? Please provide actual facts, as elusive as they are for your side.

But advocacy groups for minorities and the poor dispute that and argue there is no evidence of significant voter fraud. (emph mine)

So what the fuck is it, there is voter fraud being perpetrated as the premise for DoJ’s meddling or there isn’t according to your own side?

In regard to Texas, “I cannot conclude that the state has sustained its burden” of showing that the newly enacted law has neither a discriminatory purpose nor effect, Thomas E. Perez, the head of the Justice Department’s civil rights division, said in a letter to the Texas secretary of state.

That’s proving a negative, he’s saddling us with. You can easily develop a metric to show a positive result, in this case merely anonymous tracking of voting by minorities after the law’s passage vs. before. It’s a helluva lot harder if not impossible to prove the law is NOT discriminatory. This case would involve a determination of why a minority did NOT vote, where many, many reasons could exist (like the weather, a proven factor), all of which would NOT be the result of the law.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbot has said the Obama administration is hostile to laws like the one passed last year in Texas.

Hell yeah, Teh Won™ has had a turgid member for Texas since, well forever. He tends to visit only here in Austin, a hotbed of liberal douche-baggery (distributed by Zipcode actually). I’m surprised that he doesn’t visit the Big D, as it wants desperately to be New Manhattan, and has it’s share of liberal representation.

The National Conference of State Legislatures called the voter ID issue “the hottest topic of legislation in the field of elections in 2011,” with legislation introduced in 34 states.

And of course, we jumped right out there among the first in an attempt to clean up elections.

The department had been reviewing the Texas law since last year and discussing the matter with state officials. In January, Texas officials sued U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, seeking a court judgment that the state’s recently enacted voter ID law was not discriminatory in purpose or effect.

So why now?, Texas is already suing your asses over this issue, but you smegma-sniffers want to jump out ahead and do your best to poison the well BEFORE anything happens in court. It’s about 99% certain that SCOTUS will overturn your objections, as a ruling in favor of this concept is the reason so many states are enacting the laws. Makes you want to punch the screen, eh? Those are your taxpayer dollars being spent uselessly.

As a state with a history of voter discrimination, Texas is required under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to get advance approval of voting changes from either the Justice Department or the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.

Ahhh yes our history of voter discrimination 50 or more years ago huh? Unlike 2010 in Philadelphia where Black Panther goons, armed with baseball bats, blocked entrance to the polling places by white folks, chanting such nice things like “kill the whiteys” is perfectly acceptable. This is the very same Civil Rights Division that cleared the issue here. Bastards didn’t think we would notice that I betcha.

In a letter to Texas officials that was also filed in the court case in Washington, the Justice Department said Hispanic voters in Texas are more than twice as likely than non-Hispanic voters to lack a driver’s license or personal state-issued photo ID. The department said that even the lowest estimates showed about half of Hispanic registered voters lack such identification.

Because the Hispanics you refer to, ARE NOT eligible for state-issued ID. How fucking dense are you people? Our law is intended to protect the integrity of our elections, by preventing ineligible persons from voting. I work in a business where ID is required for certain transactions, and you would be amazed at the number of customers I see that have only a Matricula Consular for identification, that isn’t even widely accepted as ID in Mexico for cryin’ out loud. The damn cards are a backdoor attempt to get some sort of legal immigration status for Mexican nation illegals loose in the US. Hell these guys are so far under the radar that they don’t even have legit ID (i.e. a driver’s license) for their own country. By the very definition of a consular ID they aren’t citizens and unable to vote. Yanking meaningless statistics out of your ass doesn’t build your case. Of course there will be a large difference between Hispanic and Non-Hispanic voters where in some areas of the state up to 40% of the populace is Hispanic and of those, a significant percentage of illegals exist. Duhhh…of course there’s a significant variance there. How about lemme see, umm well shit, you can’t really contrast this issue this way, because there isn’t a believable estimate of illegal populations. DHS estimates it’s about 700,000 in Texas, but as a resident I think that is off by a large figure, realistically it’s probably on the order of 1,000,000. Here’s an interesting article: Not doing the jobs Americans won’t do: 70% of illegal aliens in Texas receive welfare. Obviously a helluva lot of illegals are obtaining acceptable ID for state benefits, so why would this NOT translate into voting as well?. That in and of itself would make a strong case for routine vote fraud, that could only be corrected by requiring legal ID to register and vote.

The range was so broad because the state provided two sets of registered voter data.


In December, the Justice Department rejected South Carolina’s voter ID law on grounds it makes it harder for minorities to cast ballots. It was the first voter ID law to be rejected by the department in nearly 20 years.

That’s because you haven’t had a socialist president, surrounded by socialist cabinet appointees.

In response, South Carolina sued Holder; the state argued that enforcement of its new law will not disenfranchise any voters.

Hey SC’ers, happy to have y’all here to, even if your damn flag looks a bit muzzie.

Other states have moved toward photo ID requirements in the past year.

Alabama has a photo ID law, but it does not go in effect until 2014. Mississippi voters approved a photo ID law, but the state legislature has not yet adopted enabling legislation. The Justice Department has not yet reviewed the initiatives in either state.

The Justice Department has said it is reviewing voter ID laws in other states, but has not identified which ones.

Well DoJ you have once again, proven beyond a doubt what your agenda is and it sure is NOT defending the people and the constitution from depredation by others. You have made a conscious decision to assist illegal persons from corrupting our most basic of freedoms, that of representative government. Utterly lawless. This my friends has to be the most corrupt of the corrupt government agencies.

Yanno guys, in my book there’s a name for what they are doing……TREASON

-Carry On

[UPDATE: I cruised over to the Angry Webmaster’s joint after seeing his comment below and found that he had a take on this issue too. A very prescient and well researched take: Eric Holder Blocks Texas Voting Law definitely worth a read.]


  1. 1
    Lady H growls and barks:

    I think this affects us in South Carolina as well.

    For once, I wish we’d have an Andrew Jackson say ” Eric Holder (or any assorted leftist in power) has made his decision, now let him enforce it.”

    Just once.

  2. 2
    Mark12A growls and barks:

    I can’t think of too many things that DON’T require photo ID. You can’t fly, drive, drink, write a check, get a bank account, or use a credit card without photo ID.

    How about this: When the left drops the requirement to SHOW PHOTO ID to buy a handgun, I’ll step away from wanting their base to show one when voting.

    I’m voting in Alabama today. We have to show ID, but not necessarily photo ID. It can be a utility bill or bank statement or whatever. In 2014, however, the photo ID requriement kicks in…unless DickHolder and the Department of Injustice comes and pisses in our pool.

    Arrogant bastard.

  3. 3
    angrywebmaster growls and barks:

    Lady H @ #:
    ” Eric Holder (or any assorted leftist in power) has made his decision, now let him enforce it.”

    Just once.

    I would prefer many many times.
    I saw this yesterday and wrote about it myself.

    I’m not in Texas but New Hampshire also has a few issues with voting thanks to some changes made in the registration process under the Democrats. (Who we got rid of big time in 2010)

    Come on Texas Tell Holder to bite your shiny non-metallic ass! :em07:

  4. 4

    This is rather timely,, ‘can’t wait to see the tap dance when Holder get’s wind of O’Keefe’s new expose’., just after making THOSE wacky statements. :em05:
    Ska-RU firing holder,, ARREST him!

  5. 5
    BigDogg growls and barks:

    I like to put in a bid for constructing the gallows when this fucking administration gets what it truly deserves.

  6. 6
    LC Jackboot IC/A growls and barks:

    LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech says:

    O’Keefe’s new expose

    I had a look at that one Bro. Un-fucking-believable, but NOT all that surprising. Hell there is just no way those states might have any voter shenanigans going on.

  7. 7
    LC Jackboot IC/A growls and barks:

    BigDogg says:

    tructing the gallows

    You build it and I’ll run it. I know how to tie a proper hangman’s knot too. Only thing we need to figure out is how many ‘guests’ it can accommodate at once. Seems likely that there will be a shit-load of ’em.

  8. 8
    Secondmouse growls and barks:

    The liberal argument on this issue is exactly like telling law enforcement that they are no longer allowed to stop drivers for speeding, because there is a chance that a favored minority may be behind the wheel and have no driver’s license. That is patently absurd – so is their argument here.

  9. 9
    Cannon Fodder growls and barks:

    It amazes me that the fed allows states to require you to have a drivers license in order to travel around in your PERSONAL vehicle. Which a number out there believe they have no right to do, but they will not allow states to require positive ID in order to vote. This just escapes me at every turn.

  10. 10
    LC TerribleTroy growls and barks:

    LC Jackboot IC/A @ #:

    Gallows are ok. I prefer want the Guillotine. Saves time and rope.

  11. 11
    LC Jackboot IC/A growls and barks:

    LC TerribleTroy says:

    I prefer want the Guillotine.

    Ooo stop teasing me you silver-tongued devil you….. :em05:

  12. 12
    Slightly to the right of Gingis Khan growls and barks:

    They are voting on Pennsylvania’s version this week. It is gonna pass and the Gov. will probably sign it before Friday. My guess is one of two things will happen, either the DOJ will give the ACLU or some other like minded group a couple of weeks to step up before they challenge it themselves. Or they will wait till after the primary, find some elderly black woman from Philly who will be turned away at the polls, she’ll give a press conference held by her Demoncrat congress critter, and the challenge will come then.

    Pennsylvania is in play and if Dumbo looses PA he is done. The problem is, with Philly in the mix the margin probably will not be outside the cheating point. They can’t afford to make it any harder to plug in 10,000 votes.

  13. 13
    Mark12A growls and barks:

    Guillotines? No way. Libtard blood is probably WAY too tainted with pathogens. The biohazard cleanup alone would be monumental. Ditch, bullet, bulldozer. No muss, no fuss.

  14. 14
    Bones growls and barks:

    This group of fucktards are really working overtime to get the revolution going, aren’t they. You can only poke the dog so many times before it either walks away or bites you. Unfortunately for them, the dogs of war have very sharp and long teeth, and I think the dog is very tired of walking away. I pray for peace but I do not think this is going to end well.
    Oh, and as a side note, our flag ain’t even close to muzzy! The palmetto tree is the favored log for building forts since musket nor cannon shot penetrates it and the half-moon is the from the crest of the general who led our boys during the troubles. Sorry, can’t remember his name right now.

  15. 15
    Slightly to the right of Gingis Khan growls and barks:

    Mark12A @ #:
    If you’re breaking out the dozers why waste the bullets? Simply dig, fill, cover.

  16. 16
    LC Mike in Chi growls and barks:

    Slightly to the right of Gingis Khan says:

    Simply dig, fill, cover.

    Why dig and cover the nasty LLL’s into a landfill that could poison the water table?
    We’ve got volcanoes!
    Brimstone and a lake of fire has a bit of irony, right?

  17. 17
    FrankOK growls and barks:

    Poor old Heinrich Holder – doing everything he can the get his Lawn Jockey in Chief returned to the White House, taking with him the First Hairless Wookie.

    I need the assembly point and a time – I know what to bring.

  18. 18
    Mark12A growls and barks:

    Lawn Jockey In Chief? Priceless.

    The last completely politically incorrect phrase was about him “chimping out” over Santorum’s victory in Alabama and Mississippi.

    I guess I’m going to hell.

    Frank, just like the old joke said…when you’re going to a gunfight, bring two guns and all your friends who have guns. Make friends with the guys on the crew-served weapons and be sure you owe them money.

  19. 19
    FrankOK growls and barks:

    Mark12A says:

    Lawn Jockey In Chief? Priceless.

    The last completely politically incorrect phrase was about him “chimping out” over Santorum’s victory in Alabama and Mississippi.

    I guess I’m going to hell.

    Frank, just like the old joke said…when you’re going to a gunfight, bring two guns and all your friends who have guns. Make friends with the guys on the crew-served weapons and be sure you owe them money.


  20. 20
    kwongdzu growls and barks:

    I have never heard EVEN ONE good argument for why requiring ID is discriminatory.

  21. 21
    Mark12A growls and barks:

    Oh, kwongdzu. Listen and learn, grasshopper.

    It’s because it discriminates against the democratic base…illegals immigrants, convicted felons, fabricated identities, and the dead rising from their graves to vote. You simply CANNOT discriminate against dead people and keep them from voting just because they’re…you know…dead.

  22. 22
    LC Sir Rurik, K.o.E. growls and barks:

    Slightly to the right of Gingis Khan @ #15:
    Another appropriate technique might be a method used on mink to preserve the pelt unsullied. … Attach an electric clamp to the tongue and insert a cold electric probe up the anus. “Don’t worry, it will warm up when the switch is thrown.”
    And whatever method, let’s remember to include the whole Royal family, not forgetting Aunt Zaituni and drunken Cousin Onyango.

  23. 23
    LC Sir Rurik, K.o.E. growls and barks:

    FrankOK @ #17

    Don’t look now, but he’s even got a new flag: :em08:

  24. 24

    The Justice Department has said it is reviewing voter ID laws in other states, but has not identified which ones.

    Hell I had to show ID every time I voted in Louisiana. The first time I voted here in Texas, I automatically pulled out my DL, along with my voter ID card, and handed it to the gal checking the list. She had a puzzled look on her face and informed me that a photo ID was not required. I informed her that was how it was done in Louisiana and I was shocked it wasn’t required here in Texas. She agreed completely.

  25. 25
    VonZorch Imperial Researcher growls and barks:

    The Lawless Department Of In-justice

    That should be Reichsministry of In-Justice.

  26. 26
    Mark12A growls and barks:

    Orwellian truth-speak, VonZorch.

  27. 27
    LC Ogrrre growls and barks:

    Well, when you install me as dictator, the second thing I’ll do, right after frog-marching Barry and Eric to the Mexican border to turn them over to the Federales so they can prosecute them according to Mexican law for their part in Fast and Furious, will be to completely purge all voting registration rolls. Then, in anticipation to returning the country to a Republic, will set in place a program such that in order to register to vote, one must present either an American passport, or an American birth certificate and social security number (which must be verified through e-verify). There will be no registration or changes in party affiliation allowed within 30 days of an election. In fact, when registering to vote, not only will the registrant have to produce their own American birth certificate, they will have to produce both of their parents’ birth certificates showing that the parents were born in the US, or on US military bases over seas, or the naturalization papers of the parent(s) who may have been a citizen of another country. In other words, anchor babies don’t get to vote. All addresses given during registration must be verified by the county in which the person is registering. Any person engaged in voter fraud, voter intimidation, or registration fraud will be immediately and publicly executed.

  28. 28
    bruce growls and barks:

    leave out the bullit :em01: Mark12A @ #:

  29. 29
    bruce growls and barks:

    every time fast and forious holder has gone to court with his rump swab lawyers he has punishment for treason i had always wanted to see the traitors ride old sparkey at half time,no hood of course,then dump the crispy critters in to the ditch and cap them with urinals that say here lie the bones of traitors.

  30. 30
    Mark12A growls and barks:

    I especially like the last few lines from King John in Robin Hood (2010) where he’s talking about Russell Crowe’s character…something like…

    “I declare him OUTLAW, to be killed by any Englishman on sight, and be left as carrion for foxes and crows.”

    Not exactly right, but perhaps appropriate when you’re dealing with genuine traitors.

  31. 31
    LC Xystus growls and barks:


    Oh, and as a side note, our flag ain’t even close to muzzy! The palmetto tree is the favored log for building forts since musket nor cannon shot penetrates it and the half-moon is the from the crest of the general who led our boys during the troubles. Sorry, can’t remember his name right now.

    Seem to recall it was Moultrie.

  32. 32
    Special Ed growls and barks:

    Soo, I’m just wondering … Is photo ID going to be required to receive any goodies from the Obamatopian Gov’t of the future?

  33. 33
    angrywebmaster growls and barks:

    Special Ed @ #:

    Soo, I’m just wondering … Is photo ID going to be required to receive any goodies from the Obamatopian Gov’t of the future?

    Generally yes, unless you’re 13 year old girl in need of an abortion. :em08:

  34. 34