Presented without further ado, the Quote of the Day from Bill Quick:

Okay, explain something to me, please.

The fellating tools and hack propagandists at the Washington Post assure us that if a tax cut less than a year old is not renewed, then we will be getting a tax increase.

Yet not renewing a Bush tax cut more than ten years old is somehow not a tax increase. It is repealing the Bush tax cut.

So why is the first of these not repealing the Obama tax cut? Or even better, why isn’t it reducing spending in the tax code?

Of course, that’s a rhetorical question.

But we went ahead and asked a liberal anyway to see if he knew the answer too, to which we got the reply: “Because… SHUT UP! RAAAAACIST!”

Well. We tried.

As to the whole Senate vs. House showdown on the extension of the tax cut, we’d like to point out that the Republicans, those tax-hiking brutes wanting to starve the pore working class by denying them their two-month extension, were actually insisting on a whole year, but the Democrat Socialists of the Senate wouldn’t agree to it unless they got to hike the taxes on “the rich.” You know, those people actually creating jobs which, last we checked, is what this economy really needs.

Sure, a tax cut extension for the “poor” is all well and good, taxes ought by right to be cut all over the place since it’s not the government’s money to begin with, but a tax cut isn’t much good if you don’t have a job earning you a wage you can pay taxes out of, is it?

We don’t need higher taxes. We need more people back to work so they can pay them.

So the dumbass RINOglicans in the Senate bent over again and agreed to a daft, unworkable two-month extension, which now places Ear Leader Ogabe in the position where he can hammer the actual Republicans who knew this wasn’t going to work (YOU try running payroll with taxes changing back and forth within the year) for “refusing to cut taxes.”

Yeah, refusing to cut taxes for less than one full year.

Way to go, Mitch McCockless. Oh, and next time you might want to have a conference call with your colleagues in the House before you march out with yet another “Victory Deal”, m’kay?

We swear, if there are life forms on this planet more inexplicably, impenetrably imbecilic than Republican congress retards, we’d like to hear about them.

They don’t call the The Party of Stupid for nothing.

Thatisall.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

By Emperor Misha I

Ruler of all I survey -- and then some.

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sleeper
sleeper
Member
December 21, 2011 06:44

So even though the Social Security “Trust Fund” will run out of money in 2037, it’s ok to underfund it for a couple of years? Is there any doubt that the shortfall will be covered by the general fund (let’s ignore that the general fund balance is less than zero)? The “payroll tax cut” is really an OASDI tax cut.… Read more »

0007
0007
Member
December 21, 2011 09:01

Just for the recoerd, there hasn’t been a “trust fund” since lbjRIH and his democraps started pooling both the fica and the income ta into the general “revenue pot back around ’65-66(?). Not sayin’ the repukes didn’t aid and abet, just sayin’ the demos started it.

LC Sir Clambake, Imperial Black Ops Technician, K.o.E.
Member
December 21, 2011 12:23

the botnet
Member
December 22, 2011 18:00

It’s even better than that, Misha… we have a drone parroting Statist oogabooga. Somehow a kleptocracy is the key to all-around prosperity, and the very best possible economic system is one where the noble and beneficent gummint robs you by force and gives your money to the lazy, stupid, unlucky, and helpless as their reward for breathing. And all that… Read more »