In Other “Rule of Law” News

She Who Will Not be Recused™ continues to be unrecused.

Which, of course, is completely understandable and to say otherwise would be as “unreasonable” as denying Hermann Goering a spot on the panel of judges at the Nuremberg Tribunals.

Why do you hate the rule of law so much, you Tea Party extremists?

Thatisall.

10 comments

  1. 1
    LC Gladiator growls and barks:

    This slimy skank-whore -bitch should recuse herself along with Sonya “wise Latina” Sotomayor and burn in hell to boot. Is that too radical DJ????????????????????

    Oh yeah………….FOIST !!

  2. 2
    Emperor Misha I growls and barks:

    LC Gladiator says:

    This slimy skank-whore -bitch should recuse herself along with Sonya “wise Latina” Sotomayor and burn in hell to boot. Is that too radical

    Yes. It is. Satan doesn’t deserve that kind of punishment. We’ll have to come up with a new version of Hell for those whores.
    Emperor Misha I recently posted..In Other “Rule of Law” NewsMy Profile

  3. 3
    LC Jackboot IC/A growls and barks:

    This is one of the very few things Ogabilini got right for his side. His appointment and breeze to the confirmation of this bull-dyke confirmed is one helluva political score.

    As usual, our side couldn’t be bothered with actually thinking ahead about the damage she, all by herself could do with the country sitting there on the bench, FOR LIFE.

    As usual, they gave a flaccid objection during her confirmation process (just enough to appear they’re doing something for the rubes) and decided once again, to be played the fucking fools they are and voted FOR her.

    The upcoming battle over this just might be the catalyst that starts the Box-3 remedy. To think that we have allowed our politics to get so far away from representing “We The People”, that one black-robed tyrant can fundamentally reshape the Republic is absolutely sickening. I think we’ve taken enough notes so it will NOT happen again.

    Never again should we let the tiniest outpost of leftist ideology remain intact, lest, just like a single cancer cell can destroy the host if not stopped.
    LC Jackboot IC/A recently posted..Our most precious bloodMy Profile

  4. 4
    LC Proud Infidel growls and barks:

    The law ONLY applies to us taxpaying serfs, not self-anointed royalty like them, at least they think so.

  5. 5

    LC Proud Infidel says:

    The law ONLY applies to us taxpaying serfs, not self-anointed royalty like them, at least they think so.

    Hey, the appontment IS “for life”. Just sayin’. Shame there’s no “spit” emoticon.
    LC cmblake6, Imperial Black Ops Technician recently posted..He lived under it,My Profile

  6. 6
    angrywebmaster growls and barks:

    I wonder if Kagen understand the trap she’s set for her self? Is there a statute of limitations on lying to a congressional committee?
    :em03:

    While the current senate is useless, it doesn’t mean the next one won’t remove her.
    angrywebmaster recently posted..A fish story with a bad endingMy Profile

  7. 7
    Igor, Imperial Booby growls and barks:

    angrywebmaster @ #6:
    Ain’t gonna happen, the Leftards will scream and throw a hissy-fit if it’s even *mentioned* that she lied to Congress. Besides, what is the mechanism for removing such a judge? Who watches the watchmen? Who bells the cat?
    Box 3 is the only real remedy. There is no appeal.

  8. 8
    MikeG growls and barks:

    Help me out here, Pups. Say Kagan does not recuse herself, even when A great argument can be made as to why she should. Is there a precedent for such a situation?

  9. 9
    LC hilljohnny growls and barks:

    Igor, Imperial Booby says:

    what is the mechanism for removing such a judge?

    impeachment is the only way to remove her. i don’t know if lying is sufficient cause.

  10. 10
    lc purple raider growls and barks:

    Is there a statute of limitations on lying to a congressional committee?

    Yes, there is a statute of limitations, but Elena Kostas is well within that window…