Well Put, Sestrichka!

Our dear sestrichka, Nicki, has a few words to say about the renewed gun control insanity in general and the backing of RINO fuckwads that it is receiving in particular. You really don’t want to miss it.

We’ll just note the closing line of the post and then you can go read the whole thing.

And for those of you who vomit forth the old “Why would you need a high-capacity magazine” meme, I once again repeat: It’s a Bill of Rights, not a Bill of Needs, asstards. Deal with it.

“Asstards.” I love it. You do me proud, sestrichka.

Thatisall.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
LC Xystus
LC Xystus
January 21, 2011 02:17

Why would I need one? To defeat multiple/well-armed enemies, of course.

LC Draco
LC Draco
January 21, 2011 05:11

“Asstards”…gotta love it!! Can I add fucktarks to the lexicon? :em02:

LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch
LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch
January 21, 2011 06:01

Awww, bratets, I’m honored and flattered! (and I’ll take it!) Glad you liked the rant. I considered being rational, logical and civil, but Rob pushed me to get my aggression out! :em03:

LC Xealot
LC Xealot
January 21, 2011 10:56

I’ve got a 32 round “stick’o’pain” on my Ruger. I was told by a cop, once, that though it’s fully legal in Florida, if I went across the border with it into Georgia, it would be a felony to even possess it. What kind of ass backwards logic is that anyway? What, are we supposed to go back to musket… Read more »

Slightly to the right of Gingis Khan
Slightly to the right of Gingis Khan
January 21, 2011 11:18

I prefer standard mags, a nice mag well and pads vs. a high capacity mag that sticks 3 inches out the bottom of my 1911’s. I like the balance, I like the weight with standard capacity mags. I tend to follow Jeff Cooper”s line of “If you need more than the 8 rounds in the standard 1911 mag…… you’re not… Read more »

LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech, Imperial Photographer, K.o.E.
LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech, Imperial Photographer, K.o.E.
January 21, 2011 11:36

Why do we need big mags? 1/So we needn’t carry multiple guns 2/More bullets fit in them 3/Some of us are just lousy shots, ‘might take a couple more to do the job right n’ end the attack.. 4/Some goblins aren’t happy with just a couple of shots in them and need more. They tend to continue their attacks until… Read more »

Slightly to the right of Gingis Khan
Slightly to the right of Gingis Khan
January 21, 2011 11:46

LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech says:

1/So we needn’t carry multiple guns

But the New York reload is such a wonderful thing!

LC Spare Parts
LC Spare Parts
January 21, 2011 16:55

The first postulate of the Liberals is that they must try to control circumstances because they do not believe in controlling behavior: (that is, Their behavior.) Somebody posted on the TAS blog, “the culture war is over and the assholes won.” Face it pups. We now live in a rectocracy. Those wielding the executive powers being the self ordained and… Read more »

Terrapod
Terrapod
January 21, 2011 19:37

Not understanding Russian or Ukrainian (transliteration), sestrichka (sissy), sestrichki (sissy), pestunchik (nurseling, nursling, pet, sissy?? How exactly does one take this word?

Terrapod
Terrapod
January 21, 2011 19:46

Well, I found my answer – obviously teh Ukranians don’t like Russians :em93: Sestrichka. Diminutives are generally formed by adding “-ik” or “-chka” to the nominative form. In this case, we want “little sister” so we take the nominative for “sister” – “sestra”, and add the ending “-chka” to make “sestrichka” . My lesson for the day is done :em04:

LC MosinFiend
LC MosinFiend
January 21, 2011 20:22

Good article. My respect for Cheney has dropped with him getting on the GFW bandwagon. Remember kids, a 15 round magazine on a handgun is bad, but three 10 round magazines are much safer! :em98:

sleeper
sleeper
January 21, 2011 21:23

LC Spare Parts says: The first postulate of the Liberals is that they must try to control circumstances because they do not believe in controlling behavior: You got that right. Most laws these days (from federal to local) are based on this principle. On another note: Anthony (of Opie and Anthony fame) was on Redeye, and summed up the only… Read more »

LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch
LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch
January 22, 2011 17:00

OK, I’m a tard. I can’t find your actual email. I’ll drop you a note on FB. Would that be OK?

LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch
LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch
January 22, 2011 17:02

Hah!!! Found your email on Facebook. LOL I’ll hit up your gmail. TIA for any info you can give!

LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch
LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch
January 22, 2011 18:26

Response to Emperor Misha I @: Bratets, glad you told me all that. Been having some family issues that require said testing, and trying to get the most effective (and cost effective) way to test. As far as testing people for drugs before gun purchase, I still maintain it’s a) unconstitutional and b) will create more headaches than it solves.… Read more »

Darth Venomous
Darth Venomous
January 23, 2011 01:14

Once they’ve completed their “punishment” phase, they are transferred to another type of lockup that allows them a certain amount of freedom. It could be expanded to the point where they are mostly self-sustaining and maybe even produce a product or service to society as a whole. But they would never be allowed to leave.

Funny you should mention that

LC Gunsniper
LC Gunsniper
January 23, 2011 01:18

Response to Darth Venomous @#36:

:em69: :em69:

LC Roguetek
LC Roguetek
January 23, 2011 01:52

As far as having to clear a piss test to buy a gun, I’ve got two words. ‘unfunded mandate’. “gee, we’d love to give you that test, but we dont have the money to buy supplies/train officers/rent space/excuse-of-the-week” “Sure, we’ll do that test for you, the govt fee is 1,000.00USD, plus a six month waiting period, while we ship your… Read more »

BC, Imperial Torturer
Admin
BC, Imperial Torturer
January 23, 2011 10:08

People, people… I say that we show some “civility” and “bipartisanship” and meet DJ halfway and we’ll be able to kill three birds with one stone solve three problems at once. “WTF are you talking about?”, you may be asking yourselves… Well, here it is: We’ll agree to this “drug testing” before someone is allowed to purchase their first gun… Read more »

LC PrimEviL
LC PrimEviL
January 23, 2011 10:48

What’s all this crap about piss test to buy a gun? It’s ridiculous. Just one more harassment of the citizenry by Big Brother. Further, like like all such statist nonsense, it would be ineffucktual* at keeping “prohibited persons” from acquiring firearms. The laws on the books now can’t keep illegally acquired/possessed guns off of the street, as is. The day… Read more »

BC, Imperial Torturer
Admin
BC, Imperial Torturer
January 23, 2011 19:15

WHERE does it say that God gave you the right to own a gun?

We’ll just leave it to what it says in the Constitution and stick with the 2nd Amendment and leave it at that. Is that OK with you? :em93:

LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch
LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch
January 23, 2011 21:15

Since I’m about as religious as… well… I’m not, I can only draw this logical conclusion: The religious folks believe it was God who gave them life. Therefore, it is logical to assume that the entity that gives you the right to life, also gives you the right to protect that life with the best tools available on the market… Read more »

LC PrimEviL
LC PrimEviL
January 23, 2011 21:56

*sigh* People. . . Note the qualifier “natural”, referring to the concept of “Natural Right”. natural rights, political theory that maintains that an individual enters into society with certain basic rights and that no government can deny these rights. The modern idea of natural rights grew out of the ancient and medieval doctrines of natural law, i.e., the belief that… Read more »