Up is Down, Peace is War, and Obama is an Intellectual

Oh, and banning racial preferences is apparently in violation of the equal protection clause (h/t Ace).

You read that right. That wasn’t a typo. According to a federal appeals court, Michigan’s ban on using racial discrimination in university admissions is unconstitional and in violation of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. Just let that sink in for a bit. Of course, the usual racists are calling this a giant victory of racial equality:

George Washington, the chief attorney for the law’s opponents, applauded the decision today.

“It’s a great victory. It means affirmative action is legal again in college admissions. It means that thousands of talented black, Latino and Native Americans can go to our public universities,” Washington said.

And it, of course, also means that an equal number of thousands of even more talented (their grades didn’t require a melanin-based boost, after all) non-minorities won’t be going to those same schools, but let’s not talk about that. That would be raaaaacist.

Let’s turn it around: Let’s say that some state in the union got taken over by drooling, knuckle-headed fuckwit White Pride scumbags and they decided to give Caucasians a grade boost to help them get ahead in the line for college admissions. You think somebody might stand up and say “what the everloving fuck? Didn’t our ancestors fight and die to END that kind of primitive, barbarian, Nazi bullshit?” I know His Imperial Majesty would be among the ones to do so, and we wouldn’t exactly be mild and well-mannered about it either. There might be angry words. And high-powered rifle bullets.

And we’d, for once, find ourselves on the same side as liberals but we’re willing to pay that price if the cause is just.

Don’t give me any sob stories about under-privileged “darkies” who were trying hard to work their way out of a working class background but would have never made it if it hadn’t been for obviously racist preferences, because we know just as many “whiteys” who had to work their arses off too to escape their background. We were one of them. We were blessed, by G-d, so we didn’t have any need of race-based boosts to our grades to get where we went, but that doesn’t change the facts.

Besides, we didn’t have racist affirmative action laws where I come from. Hmmm… Maybe the socialist troglodytes in my native country were right on something after all: The United States actually IS a more racist country than where I came from. Only, of course, they got the racism bit exactly wrong, but that’s socialists for you. If you’re ever in a situation where you have to make a choice and you can’t for the life of you determine which one is the better one, ask a socialist. Then do the exact opposite. You’ll win every single time. But we digress.

The bottom line is this: To me, and to people like me, racism is wrong. Period. End. Stop. It’s always wrong. There are no “qualifiers”, no “best intentions”, no exceptions.

Racism. Is. Wrong.

Dead wrong. Wrong on so many levels, and wrong to the level where taking the life of a true racist is, in my humble opinion, something that falls under “pest control” and should be rewarded by society, not punished. No harm, no foul. It’s not like a racist has any use to civilized society.

Always. It’s not only wrong when it’s directed at one particular group and OK when directed at another.

It’s wrong.

And to get back to the legal aspect, the 14th Amendment doesn’t, near as my mind can see, anywhere mention that there’s an exception to the equal protection clause when the ones being discriminated against have less and a certain amount of melanin in their skin passed on to them from their parents.

Prove me wrong.

Or just go hang the racist judges in Michigan.

Thatisall.

12 comments

  1. 1
    LC HJ Caveman82952 growls and barks:

    Some animals are more equal than others………

  2. 2
    LC Spare Parts growls and barks:

    My Liege
    You simply do not understand their definition of Civil Rights. It means that privileges which their betters worked for and earned really belong to them, because politics as defined by Democrats is “who gets what.” The only thing a white man can keep them out of is his own house. And earning anything is an imposition. Life is really just like an Easter egg hunt. And nobody should get more than a “fair share.”

  3. 3
    lc purple raider growls and barks:

    This is why I say that the absolute worst racists on the planet are marxists/socialists.

    Because while they say they are for equality, their equality is so much better.

  4. 4
    LC LOBO growls and barks:

    The only thing a white man can keep them out of is his own house.

    Unless you live in Indiana.

  5. 5
    Elephant Man growls and barks:

    (moonbat)

    But….but…but what about the plight of minorities being held back by the hob-nailed jackboot of “The Man”?!?

    After all, it’s only FAIR that minorities get to enjoy the fruits of preferential treatment after 300+ years of 2nd class status!

    It is appalling that people are judged by the color of their skin rather then their abilities and …er…uh…..

    Hmmmmppph

    Well…uhhhhh……Just listen to “In the Ghetto” by Elvis Presley and wallow in guilt! It’s right there in the jukebox!

    (/moonbat)

  6. 6
    GamerFromJump growls and barks:

    Letting the race hustlers determine when the past is adequately “reconciled” is rather like taking a loan from the Mob. You’re never paid off, as the vig will wipe out any and all progress.

    Only, in this case, it’s a loan we didn’t take out in the first place, but are stuck with unless we go break their kneecaps.

  7. 7
    GamerFromJump growls and barks:

    I notice that that most-wrongly-named-since-the-Taliban* induhvidual mentioned “blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans”. What, no Asians?

    Moonbat: “But their not disadvantaged by history!”

    Bullshit. Google “US railroads Chinese” sometime. Or, if that’s too far back for you, how about the Japanese? There are people living today who were in camps, or children of same. Not a single black person living today is a slave or within two generations of one.

    You want to tell me that some literally dirt-poor villager from Thailand or Laos isn’t starting from a harder place than any living AA can even conceive of?

    Eat shit and die, raceturbators.
    ———————-
    * “Talib” means “student” in Pashto, and “-an” is the plural suffix. A more inaccurate name for those backward sub-subhumans** could hardly be conceived.

    ** Neanderthals are technically subhuman, and don’t deserve to be in the same category as the Taliban.

  8. 8
    LC Xystus growls and barks:

    George Washington, the chief attorney for the law’s opponents, applauded the decision today.

    Someone should remind him he bears the name of a famous slave owner Oh the shame!

    GamerFromJump:

    Neanderthals are technically subhuman, and don’t deserve to be in the same category as the Taliban.

    Actually they appear to be an early version of Caucasian, & their cranial capacity averages larger than that commonly found today!

  9. 9
    LC Xystus growls and barks:

    I see our ITW has eliminated the editing function yet again–but his joke box still starts up when I bail out!

  10. 10
    LC LOBO growls and barks:

    LC Xystus growls and barks:
    July 2, 2011 at 2:55 pm

    I see our ITW has eliminated the editing function yet again–but his joke box still starts up when I bail out!

    Firefox with Ad Blocker Plus. It had to be done, as the box would load a blank black space, or take ten minutes loading.

  11. 11
    Samsapeel1 growls and barks:

    I found this part of the numbcunt’s quote interesting:

    “It’s a great victory. It means affirmative action is legal again in college admissions.”

    I took the decision to mean that affirmative action MUST be applied in college admissions, NOT that it is merely o.k. to do it.

    In other words, the court appears to say that a college CAN’T NOT use affirmative action.

    Do I have that wrong?

  12. 12
    Grammar Czar growls and barks:

    GamerFromJump opines:

    I notice that that most-wrongly-named-since-the-Taliban* induhvidual mentioned “blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans”. What, no Asians?

    I taught college for 15 years. There was no group which acted more entltled than the blacks. The Latinos tried, but they just really couldn’t cut it. I never had any American Indians (that I’m aware of, anyway), so I can’t speak about them as a group. The Asians, however, worked circles around all the other races. We’ve had Thai, Nepalese (they tend towards the entitlement mentality), Mongolian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean. The Chinese are the hardest-working of all the Asians at our school.

    Per the Emperor:

    because we know just as many “whiteys” who had to work their arses off too to escape their background.

    My father (step-father, actually, but he adopted us, so he’s dad) was the child of Lithuanian immigrants. His dad was a coal miner, his mom a housewife. There were five children in total, living in a two-bedroom bungalow. They went to Catholic school, where the nuns didn’t indulge them in second-language rubbish. The neighborhood was Polish/Russian/Lithuanian, but they learned ENGLISH. They were so poor that one year for Christmas all they got was a nickel and an orange apiece. Yeah, they were poor; EVERYONE was poor then. Yet, to hear him speak, his childhood was idyllic.Out of the poverty came five successful children, four of whom went on to serve their country in separate branches of the military: one, Navy; one, AAC; one, WAC; and one USA.