And Thus it Ever Was With Fascists

But at least now the fascist Prozi “liberals” are coming out in the open, admitting to it:

How Conservatives Weaponized the First Amendment

Off to a great start, Adam. Oooh, weaponize! Boo!

WASHINGTON — On the final day of the Supreme Court term last week, Justice Elena Kagan sounded an alarm.

The court’s five conservative members, citing the First Amendment, had just dealt public unions a devastating blow.

…by finding that no, unions CAN’T steal people’s money and donate them to whomever they like (who all happen to be Prozi fascists) for those trying to keep track. But he’s not wrong about the “devastating” bit, although we suspect that it will be even more devastating to the Prozi Party that they’re laundering stolen funds for.

The day before, the same majority had used the First Amendment to reject a California law requiring religiously oriented “crisis pregnancy centers” to provide women with information about abortion.

What, they don’t have to helpfully help out the Planned Genocide abortion mills up their revenue by keeping the flow of sellable baby parts flowing? Why that’s, that’s OUTRAGEOUS!

Conservatives, said Justice Kagan, who is part of the court’s four-member liberal Stalinist wing, were “weaponizing the First Amendment.”

Corrected that for you.

The two decisions were the latest in a stunning run of victories for a conservative agenda that has increasingly been built on the foundation of free speech.


Conservative groups, borrowing and building on arguments developed by liberals, have used the First Amendment to justify unlimited campaign spending,

So freedom of speech is a “liberal” invention now? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Oh, and to clarify, “unlimited campaign spending” means “even non-unions have a right to vote with their wallets and support causes they believe in” which, we can all agree, is EXACTLY WHAT HITLER WOULD HAVE SAID!

discrimination against gay couples

Or, as it’s known outside of hysterical Prozi circles, “freedom of religion”.

and attacks on the regulation of tobacco, pharmaceuticals and guns.

We’re not entirely sure what poor Addled Adam is referring to here, and we suspect that he isn’t either.

“The right, which had for years been hostile to and very nervous about a strong First Amendment, has rediscovered it,” said Burt Neuborne, a law professor at New York University.

Proving, once again, that the Marxist Prozis, for all of their obsession with history and “the right side thereof”, really don’t have the slightest familiarity with it.

His Imperial Majesty has been of “the right” for almost his entire adult life, and we can’t remember a single time when we found ourselves “hostile” to Freedom of Speech. Growing up in a socialist country, we know a thing or two about what NOT having it means, however, and we weren’t big fans.

As a result, liberals Prozis who once championed expansive First Amendment rights are now uneasy about them.

“The left was once not just on board but leading in supporting the broadest First Amendment protections,” said Floyd Abrams, a prominent First Amendment lawyer and a supporter of broad free-speech rights. “Now the progressive community is at least skeptical and sometimes distraught at the level of First Amendment protection which is being afforded in cases brought by litigants on the right.”

The New Rules™, you’re going to hate them.

Of COURSE they are “nervous.” It’s not so much fun when the people you’ve been bludgeoning for decades suddenly realize that the bludgeon works just as well when applied to fascist skulls, is it?

As is always the case, proto-fascists only embrace things like democracy and freedom of speech when they’re useful to THEM, just as they use everything and everybody else. Once their new tool stops being useful and/or is used against them, they throw their precious “principles” of yesterday overboard immediately in their pursuit of the Prozi Utopia of Next Tuesday™.

“By any means necessary.”

It’s not like they’re even trying to HIDE it, for pity’s sakes.

Ask the socialist Hitler or, failing that now he’s dead and roasting forever in Hell, read his book. He explains quite succinctly how it works. First you use democracy and freedom of speech while you’re weak. Then, when you have the power, you throw them out.

One Man, One Vote, One Time.

They never change, it’s just their body count that keeps going up.

Until somebody finally stops them. For good.


0 0 vote
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
July 2, 2018 04:16

So, from the CommuNazi* point of view , it’s “Free speech for me but not for thee.”

Screw them. They want a war, let’s get it started so we can get it over with and go back to the BBQ.

*CommuNazi. I can’t afford the licensing fees for the use of Prozi. :em05:

July 2, 2018 05:50

Speaking of CommuniNazis, if the polling is to be believed, won’t you all please welcome our new, guaranteed to be a failed state for real, on our southern border? Then again, we already have this in Mexifornia to show how it is done.. The need for a border wall was a solidly supported (by we the people) platform issue for… Read more »

LC Xystus
LC Xystus
July 4, 2018 16:26


“REEEEEEE!!!??” :em03: