“Moderate Muslim Majority” Finally Quantified!

Time to dust this thing off again. We’ve been a bit lazy lately. Our apologies.

But boy do we have amazing news to share with you!

We’re all already all too familiar with how, every single time another hundred plus mangled bodies have been stacked upon the bloody, gore-smeared altar of multiculturalism, we’re told that we can’t possible draw any conclusions based on this the 27,459th attack by #NotAllMuslims, because that would be hideously unfair and downright brutal to the “moderate muslim majority”.

Right before we’re told, of course, that the real victims her aren’t the dismembered, bloody corpses of women and children littering the streets, but instead those very same “moderate muslims” who must now cower in existential dread under their dish-dashas while waiting for the bloody backlash that never seems to materialize. (Yet.)

What has vexed His Imperial Majesty and, we’re sure, quite a few of you, dear LCs, is that we never can seem to get a solid number as to the size of this “moderate muslim majority.”

Never, until now, that is, thanks to this otherwise tedious, pompous, suicidal bit of idiocy from the New York Slimes.

“Our cities are facing a huge problem, maybe the largest since World War II,” Mr. Goldstein said. “How is it that people who were born here in Brussels, in Paris, can call heroes the people who commit violence and terror? That is the real question we’re facing.”

Friends who teach the equivalent of high school seniors in the predominantly Muslim districts of Molenbeek and Schaerbeek told him that “90 percent of their students, 17, 18 years old, called them heroes,” he said.

OK.

So 10%? That’s the size of the “moderate muslim majority?”

That’s right in the neighborhood of what we’d expected. On a particularly optimistic day.

So what do we do with the other 90%

Glad you asked:

Crispy Critters!

Crispy Critters!

Thatisall.

16 comments

  1. 1
    angrywebmaster growls and barks:

    I seem to recall one of those 10 percent was murdered in England I believe by a few of the other 90 percent. Why? He was nice to non-Muslims or something.

    And an aside.

    What’s the picture down there in for IT jobs? I’m thinking it’s time to move from the home of Sig Saur.
    :em03:
    angrywebmaster recently posted..Collage administration finally stands up to SJW’sMy Profile

  2. 2
    JonB growls and barks:

    If we don’t start killing them, it’s over. Their goal is to kill every last one of us. If we do not meet them with equal force and will, we will not exist in 15years or so.

  3. 3
    VonZorch Imperial Researcher growls and barks:

    Nukes are ok, but I prefer high lethality, low persistence gasses, repeat application as necessary. After all there is some very beautiful and historic architecture there, and a nuke would destroy a lot of it, as well as complicating resource extraction. Oh except for Mecca, give that place at least seven warheads clustered so the fireballs touch the seventh an air burst centered over the other six.

  4. 4
    Fa Cube Itches growls and barks:

    VonZorch Imperial Researcher @ #:

    Nah, just have our Russian friends dust off a Tsar bomba for old time’s sake. Show ‘em what the Hand of God really looks like. You know, as a conversation starter.

  5. 5
    redc1c4 growls and barks:

    i’m thinking that, once we have an American President in office, they simply announce that the next attack by the religion of pieces on our citizens will be met with a response that will indicate once and for all that murdering them is unacceptable.

    the day after the inevitable attack, Mecca and Medina disappear in a series of nuclear fireballs, leaving only fused silica behind, and not the slightest trace of what used to be there.

    it’ll be damn difficult to be a good moose slime and complete the haji, when there’s no where to travel to, but that’s not my problem.

  6. 6
    Mattexian growls and barks:

    Maybe my memory’s faulty, but I vaguely recall one incident of backlash after 9/11, but it unfortunately targeted a Sikh, not a Muslim.

    As one meme I’ve seen says, “I’m Sikh and tired of being confused with terrorists! We’re the 7-11 people, not the 9/11 prople!” :em05:
    Mattexian recently posted..Recent thoughts, and National Ammo day 2012My Profile

  7. 7
    VonZorch Imperial Researcher growls and barks:

    Fa Cube Itches @ #: 4
    Yeah, that’ll work too.

  8. 8
    LC Xystus growls and barks:

    Mattexian:

    Maybe my memory’s faulty, but I vaguely recall one incident of backlash after 9/11, but it unfortunately targeted a Sikh, not a Muslim.

    Yeah, I remember that too. Some idiot couldn’t tell the turbans apart. :em04:

  9. 9
    Tallulah growls and barks:

    Yes.

    And there’s this:

    “Twenty years ago … I published the report titled Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All, we thought that the real risk of the arrival of new communities was discrimination against Muslims,” writes Trevor Phillips, former head of Britain’s Equalities and Human Rights Commission.

    Liberal opinion in Britain has, for more than two decades, maintained that most Muslims are just like everyone else. Britain desperately wants to think of its Muslims as versions of the Great British Bake-Off winner Nadiya Hussain, or the cheeky-chappie athlete Mo Farah. But thanks to the most detailed and comprehensive survey of British Muslim opinion yet conducted, we now know that just isn’t how it is.

    One in five Muslims in Britain never enter a non-Muslim house;
    39 per cent of Muslims, male and female, say a woman should always obey her husband;
    31 per cent of British Muslims support the right of a man to have more than one wife;
    52 per cent of Muslims did not believe that homosexuality should be legal;
    23 per cent of Muslims support the introduction of Sharia law rather than the laws laid down by parliament.

    – Trevor Phillips (who is a black man from a British Guyanese family), the former head of Britain’s Equalities and Human Rights Commission

    This made the shite hit the fan in Old Blighty, and all the Lefty “luvvies” are having an absolute cow. He also says that the Moslems’ misogyny is a huge problem, and talked about the mass rape by moslem monsters of the English girls in Rotherham (over 1,400 children!!!!) and other cities throughout England.

    But, president Asswipe wants millions of his fellow moslems shoveled into America. The better to fuck us up, of course.

  10. 10
    Tallulah growls and barks:

    And for the record, SIKHS ARE OKAY.

    [Though it has to be said, not all of them know how to run a gas station…. ;-)

  11. 11
    angrywebmaster growls and barks:

    Tallulah @ #:

    And for the record, SIKHS ARE OKAY.

    :em01:
    Actually, Sikh’s are Cool.
    And for the record, I’m not a sikh.
    Sikh’s and Muslims get along, traditionally, like nitro and matches.
    angrywebmaster recently posted..Democrat AG’s begin inquisition of Energy companiesMy Profile

  12. 12
    lc purple raider growls and barks:

    angrywebmaster says:

    Sikh’s and Muslims get along, traditionally, like nitro and matches

    You could insert any nationality: Sikh, Italian, Japanese, whatever, and that sentence would still be correct.

  13. 13
    LC&IB Vulcanrider, MSgt, USAF, Ret growls and barks:

    The next president has to do it the Chicago way…

    They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. *That’s* the *Chicago* way! And that’s how you get Islamist scum. Now do you want to do that? Are you ready to do that? I’m offering you a deal. Do you want this deal?

    There’s no other choice and no such thing as collateral damage in this war. And take it from someone who’s spent a lot of time in the Middle East, it’s the ONLY way!

  14. 14
    LC Xystus growls and barks:

    Wir werden der Feind zerstören–with extreme prejudice.

  15. 15

    VonZorch Imperial Researcher says:

    Nukes are ok, but I prefer high lethality, low persistence gasses, repeat application as necessary. After all there is some very beautiful and historic architecture there, and a nuke would destroy a lot of it, as well as complicating resource extraction. Oh except for Mecca, give that place at least seven warheads clustered so the fireballs touch the seventh an air burst centered over the other six.

    This is very good indeed. Near perfect. But we may be able to stop at:
    redc1c4 says:

    i’m thinking that, once we have an American President in office, they simply announce that the next attack by the religion of pieces on our citizens will be met with a response that will indicate once and for all that murdering them is unacceptable.

    the day after the inevitable attack, Mecca and Medina disappear in a series of nuclear fireballs, leaving only fused silica behind, and not the slightest trace of what used to be there.

    it’ll be damn difficult to be a good moose slime and complete the haji, when there’s no where to travel to, but that’s not my problem.

    Screw it, do what needs to be done.


Other websites that have referenced this:

(Always a sign of good taste -- especially since they bothered to link to us) Go Check them out
  1. The Emperor Has a Solution - Daily Pundit