The Bacon Bill Challenge

So what wins out in ‘Merica, greed or orthodox Pisslam?

The challenge goes like this, smear some currency with bacon fat and offer it as tender at a Mooselimb business.

I say that Muslims in America will take the bill. A FB friend of mine who is studying the Arabic language, and consequently learning more than she cared to know about the Religion of Piss, recently posited that there are very few practicing Muslims in America. There are however quite a few people practicing Arabic traditions and customs and calling themselves Muslim, to which I have to agree. As an example I recently saw two Muslim women walking through the mall. They were wearing the hijab, but were not accompanied by any males. And the hijab itself is another case in point. A few high profile cases have made the news recently where so called Muslim women were suing state DMV’s because they weren’t allowed to wear their hijabs, or in one case a burqua, in their driver’s license photo. They claimed that their faith demanded that they wear the hijab and that being good Muslims they couldn’t disobey the Koran *spit*. I’m not sure if irony exists in Islam or not, perhaps it was banned too, but it was definitely lost on those opportunists.

So what do y’all think, would they take the money?

13 comments

  1. 1
  2. 2
    LC SecondMouse growls and barks:

    I tend to agree with you, Crunchie. Muslims who have immigrated to America are here to escape oppression and seek opportunity, and in many Muslim countries, the source of oppression is Islam itself. But like many Americans, they are not above gaming the system if they can trade on the deferential treatment they are getting from the window-licking Dhimmis running the show.

    Most I have met seem to be decent people. The risk is in their shared ethnic identity. When acting as a group, their Islamic roots can often be clearly seen, and under the right circumstances, can become the driver of their behavior. Witness the Chechen idiots and their pressure cooker bombs.

    I am concerned that we do not have any apparent policy in place that has considered this risk to Muslim immigration to the U.S. Maybe not as draconian as the Japanese, but something wise which allows us to manage the process that Europe is being decimated by.

  3. 3
    angrywebmaster growls and barks:

    I don’t know if smearing bacon fat on bills is the way to go. I prefer my way.

    4 strips of bacon
    5 sausages
    2 eggs over easy
    coffee.

    Which is what I just finished protecting my internal organs against Islamic tyranny with a few minutes ago.
    (Now working on second cup of coffee)
    :em01:

  4. 4
    LC R6 growls and barks:

    The point, like your head, of the argument is that muslims can’t have it both ways. If they are fleeing to America to practice islam without the oppression of the wacko ISLAMISTS then they practice their religion like everyone else in the country – under the constraints of OUR laws. They don’t get to have special rules that no other practicing religion gets. Covering your face or hair for a photo for LEGAL purposes counts in that “you don’t get special shit” category.

    I know, I know. You only come in here to start arguments regardless of truth or relevance. You are a shit stirrer plain and simple. You don’t want debate you just want to sling mud.

    So to your argument about this subject I say: Who really gives a fuck what YOU think? Certainly not me.

  5. 5

    They’ll take the money, then act all outraged and butthurt over the “insult” and use it as an excuse to behead someone.

  6. 6
    angrywebmaster growls and barks:

    Lady M-ITT™-Imperial Sniper G.L.O.R @ #:

    They’ll take the money, then act all outraged and butthurt over the “insult” and use it as an excuse to behead someone.

    Or set them on fire.
    :em08:

  7. 7
    Igor, Imperial Booby growls and barks:

    I kinda think it would depend on the locale, Sir Crunchie.

    When in Dearbornistan…

  8. 8
    irish19 growls and barks:

    If they are fleeing to America to practice islam without the oppression of the wacko ISLAMISTS then they practice their religion like everyone else in the country – under the constraints of OUR laws. They don’t get to have special rules that no other practicing religion gets. Covering your face or hair for a photo for LEGAL purposes counts in that “you don’t get special shit” category.

    I think the wearing of the hijab is a case in point. Wearing that particular item is no better or worse than an observant Jew wearing a yarmulke or an observant Sikh wearing the head covering (don’t know the name) they wear under the turban.
    As an example, today whilst subbing I saw a young lady wearing a hijab. She was also wearing a somewhat snug sweater and less than loose jeans. I submit that this is protected behavior under the First Amendment. However, a requirement by the Sec of State to remove it for a driver’s license photograph is not an affront to her First Amendment rights.

  9. 9
  10. 10
    Radical Redneck growls and barks:

    Gender bender in fender bender! 😯

  11. 11
    angrywebmaster growls and barks:

    Radical Redneck @ #:

    Gender bender in fender bender!

    Idiot was probably using the review mirror to touch up it’s makeup instead of watching the road.

    :em04:

  12. 12
    Radical Redneck growls and barks:

    angrywebmaster @ #:

    I guess his transitioning has reached the point where he’s an Asian woman :-p

  13. 13
    Radical Redneck growls and barks:

    angrywebmaster @ #:

    It was no accident. He/she was apprehended trying to cryogenically preserve the dead woman’s lady parts in order to appropriate for his new ones. :em06: