Taking out a Raghead

Thanks to our Australian correspondent, we already have a spectacular play-by-play and continuous update on the latest muslim terror attack in Australia.

Thankfully, only 2 human beings (and one dune coon) out of two dozen died in the attack, but that is still way too many (any number of human beings above zero would be too many). Of course, the main takeaway from this, according to our ever “neutral” media, will be that #NotAllMuslims did this and that we now have to listen to endless sermons about how “Islam is the Religion of Peace™”. We might get a few minutes of remembrance of the heroes who died after this 3,629th latest senseless burst of muslim violence (and we’re only talking about this week), but we’re not holding our breath.

#NotAllMuslims

Just like #NotAllJapanese took part in the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Thankfully, our grandparents weren’t quite as “nuanced” in their response. Also, #NotAllGermans invaded Poland. We guess that makes the Holocaust OK too, right?

But that’s not what we want to talk about. We all already know what the knee-jerk defenders of the Religion of Mass Murder are going to say, especially with their biggest cheerleader since Mohammed still in the White House, so it’s pointless to belabor that fact.

We’d like to solicit your opinions, because more than just a lot of you have actual, on the ground experience with entry situations in a civilian environment. We only know how to do it grunt style, which means “flatten everything and fuck it all.”

So, background: The standoff in Sydney had gone on for 17 hours with the cops on the ground not knowing if dropping the raghead was safe as he might have a dead man’s switch or an accomplice. At this point, the lone sand rat dozes off, dreaming of his favorite underage goats, and the owner of the cafe decides to make a move to disable the animal. Unfortunately, the ensuing struggle ends up with the owner dead, but it does force the decision whether to go in and end it or not upon the commander of the police forces outside. You can’t very well just sit by and listen to the sound of hostages being murdered. Not to mention that the sacrifice of the owner knocks the muslim baby fucker off balance enough to create a situation where entry might be possible.

So the cop in charge gives the order (the correct one in our ignorant opinion) to enter and this happens:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XA-nhBokOw[/youtube]

Our question is this: We obviously don’t know squat about forced entries in a civilian setting, but we know that a lot of our readers DO, being professional LEOs. In our opinion, that’s one professional stack entering in a very creditable manner, but what do you guys think?

We’re not talking about the decision to send the troops in, we’d have done the same thing and probably sooner, being a primitive grunt, just how they made their entry.

We think they made a damn good show, and the fact that “only” one human being died in the crossfire before they shredded mohammed’s favorite goat is pretty good, considering how many people were in there. But what do YOU think, trying not to armchair quarterback the move?

Thatisall.