Fat Chance, You Fascist Liberal Fucks

So now, after the entire Lame Stream Liberal Media have had their 24 hours of hate, jumping to conclusions all over the place and all but demanded that Sarah Palin and the entire Tea Party be arrested and tried for murder, we’re told that “both sides do it” and it’s “time for everybody to calm down their rhetoric?”

You think? Now that you’ve had your opportunity to spread your blood libel far and wide it’s time for everybody to shut up? “The prosecution rests and insists that the defense shut up and leave the rest to the jury.”

Oh, and do you remember that those same Idiotarian Mediots were the ones who, back when Nidal Goatfucker Hasan ran into a store dressed in mooselimb garb, started yelling “allahu ackbar” and gunning people down left, right and center lectured everybody on how we “mustn’t jump to conclusions” and how it was a mystery, MYSTERY what could possibly have motivated that poor fellow to do something like that?

Standards = good. Double standards = TWICE as good.

Yet here we are, the Democrat National Socialist Party and almost every “news” outlet in the country jumping to conclusions before we’ve even finished the body count.

Yeah. Fuck you very much too. It’s nothing we hadn’t expected, we knew exactly where they would go, but it takes some fucking nerve for them to demand that everybody be “reasonable” now that they’re done skull-fucking the corpses of the innocent.

And they can take the “both sides are doing it” bullshit and shove that up their Khybers too, wrapped in razor wire. Here’s a brief summary of liberal hate, ACTUAL hate, from 2000-2010. And that’s just scratching the surface, mind you.

In the other corner, we have the past two years of Tea Party activism which amounts to… Oh NOES, they dared contradict your Lord God Ogabe!!! Where’s the actual violence, though? Where are the conservatives biting off people’s fingers, beating up cripples etc.? Take your time, we’ve got all fucking day.

Yet somehow we all need to “calm down?” What’s this “we” you keep babbling about, you lying fascist fucks?

We tried to reach out to the liberal ghouls for comment, but try as we might we couldn’t pry them off of Christina Green’s cold corpse. To quote one “unnamed Democrat operative:

“They need to deftly pin this on the tea partiers,” said the Democrat. “Just like the Clinton White House deftly pinned the Oklahoma City bombing on the militia and anti-government people.”

You stay classy, Democrats. We swear, it’s hard for us to tell the difference between liberals and your average paleoswinian car swarm after another one of them has been bombed to shreds, fighting over the body parts and waving them around like battle flags.

You can go fuck yourselves, you soulless ghouls, fuck yourselves with a jackhammer dipped in glue and rolled in crushed glass and then go straight to hell. Do not pass “go”, do not collect $200.

It’ll be a fucking freezing cold day down there before we start taking lessons in “civility” from a bunch of monsters raping the body of a murdered child for political gain.



  1. 1
    Sir George growls and barks:

    Politicians and the press can go on and on about the political rhetoric creating a poisonous atmosphere, but I don’t think it would’ve mattered to the shooter because he was breathing the atmosphere on a planet entirely his own. I suppose it’s a reflection of their vanity that they seem to think that their tight little circle of politicians and pundits, their endless stream of words, really determines what motivates the rest of the people in the world.

    Blaming political rhetoric is beyond bizarre when the shooter is one of the few people who think that words have no meaning. In fact, his belief that they were meaningless formed part of the question he asked Giffords at an earlier event.

    It would’ve made more logical sense to have seized on his marijuana use, which can vastly increase the odds of schizophrenia, and then have our 24/7 new cycle go on and on about the evil weed. Or we could have focused on his fascination with Drowning Pool’s “Bodies Hit the Floor” and launched a pogrom against rock stars and rap artists.

    Or we could have used this attack as evidence that atheists have no resistance to evil forces inside their heads. Or we could have blamed his actions on his fascination with Marx, Hitler, flag burning, and liberal activism. Or we could combine all of those into rants about evil pot-smoking godless communists listening to violent rock music.

    For all we know, what tipped him over the final edge was his realization that her husband and brother-in-law were maintaining the government’s mind control satellites. So we could have launched into long diatribes about NASA and the evils of orbital based mind-control technologies, demanding action and Congressional investigations.

    That’s what it’s felt like watching the press the last two days. Of all the crazy reactions they could’ve had, they picked the absolute craziest and most nonsensical. In looking at the breathless accusations that have poured forth from the media, my impression is that the shooter was crazy because of his brain chemistry, but the commentators are even crazier because of their brain content.

    What he did was nuts and senseless. What they’re doing is dangerous, stupid, and morally repugnant, trying to limit free speech and centuries old political discourse, lynch a housewife in the frozen tundra, and shut down an entire political party, all they started before the bodies were even cold.

    In their relentless rush to push their personal political agendas, or find some added importance for their own beliefs, they were more than willing to discard

    Objectivity – Giffords was a conservative and the judge was a George W Bush appointee (though his presence was random).

    Balance – The “violent” imagery on the left is the same or worse than that on the right (The Internet is now filling with examples), and military and conflict imagery has always been used in political campaigns. Even the word “campaign” is military.

    Facts – Palin’s map was about an election that’s long over, and the symbols are datums, not cross hairs, and the far left had also targeted Giffords on their own maps.

    Logic – Why would a conservative target a blue dog, and why do so after the election, and why would anyone driven by national political discourse care that much about a member of the minority party?

    Common sense – Why would a young nihilist/liberal activist ever listen to anything Palin says, much less try to obey her?

    History – almost every shooting like this is done for bizarre reasons by someone who is clinically insane or a paranoid schizophrenic, and a basic understanding of such attacks that everyone in the press should have by now is that a political assassin targets a person, whereas this attacker tried to kill as many additional random people as possible, one at a time, with no escape plan, just like school shooters, the Texas tower killer, and other bezerkers.

    They also keep trying to ignore the obvious truth that if crazy people thought just like the rest of us, we wouldn’t call them crazy, and that such events are more likely to be motivated by barking dogs and subliminal messages from a space ship hiding in a comet than they are from a year-old campaign map put up by someone who wasn’t even on a ticket anywhere.

    And of course, the shooter developed his obsession with Giffords back in 2007, long before Palin was known outside of Alaska and years before the Tea Party even existed.

    On this event, I’ll have to say “media – FAIL”

  2. 2
    LC Proud Infidel growls and barks:

    Let’s not forget that the Communist Broadcast System (CBS) initially said he was an OEF Vet and a Tea Party member when he was rejected for service at a MEPS and he was “withdrawn” from a college with the stipulation that he would only be readmitted after a psychiatric eval said he wasn’t a danger to himself and/or others!

    FUCK the :em41: liberal jello-spined snot-drooling MSM propaganda :em72: asswipes to death sideways with a red-hot rusty mace while they’re sitting and spinning on a diarrhea-soaked pile of tangled, rusty concertina wire right after they’ve been painfully ass-raped by both a Grizzly Bear with AIDS AND the Sonofabitch who was mean enough to give it to him!!

  3. 3
    irish19 growls and barks:

    “What he did was nuts and senseless. What they’re doing is dangerous, stupid, and morally repugnant, trying to limit free speech and centuries old political discourse, lynch a housewife in the frozen tundra, and shut down an entire political party, all they started before the bodies were even cold. ”
    Methinks they are trying to create something that could be used as justification for a “Kristallnacht” against conservatives. Just a thought.

    “It’ll be a fucking freezing cold day down there”
    It will be once Algore dies.

  4. 4
    Emperor Misha I growls and barks:

    irish19 says:

    Methinks they are trying to create something that could be used as justification for a “Kristallnacht” against conservatives. Just a thought.

    There certainly is quite a bit of “Reichstag fire” to their pouncing on this, in perfect accordance with their idol, Rahm the Rotbrained’s, “never let a good crisis go to waste” dictum.

    The good news is that our homegrown commie/socialist/nazi/fascists are fucking rank amateurs compared to the real article.

    That’s no reason for NOT fighting back, however, and I’ll be a fucking monkey’s uncle before I roll over for their transparent bullshit.

    And damn you, Sir George, for nailing it in one and NOT putting it up as a post! Brilliant!!! Good to have you back!!! 😀

  5. 5
    lc purple raider growls and barks:

    Chris Matthews Asks: What Is the Cause-Effect Relationship Between Derangement and “Right-Wing Crazy Talk?

    Quoted from the left sidebar of this very blog.

    And Chrissie Tingles can take a nice long ride off a short pier.

    Doing 150MPH.

  6. 6
    Sir George growls and barks:

    I haven’t yet nailed it, because there are more points I’ve missed than made.

    From what we’ve heard from his friends, what was the shooter probably doing while Palin was uttering all those allegedly incendiary words? Well, he was probably asleep, or on the edge of sleep, with his curtains drawn, curled up in a cocoon of silence, trying to explore his dream states

    That makes me conclude that one of the few things that could’ve stopped this tragedy was, you guessed it, Sarah Palin.

    “Get your ass out of that bed! We’ve got elk to hunt and you’re just laying their like a lazy hippy on a heroin trip.”

    She’d have handled him, gotten him professional treatment, and loved him no matter what. The media keeps trying to claim Palin is involved. If she was really involved in this we wouldn’t have had a tragedy with six dead, one gravely injured in the brain, many more wounded in the body, and one going to jail or the chair. We’d have had an uplifting, inspirational story about redemption and the refusal to give up and give in.

  7. 7
    Elephant Man growls and barks:

    It turns out that Loughner registered as an Independent in 2006 .

    Jared Lee Loughner was a registered independent, didn’t vote in 2010 election

    Given his history of pot-smoking, apparent satan-worshipping, and his classmates’ description of him as “left-wing”, I doubt he voted the Republican ticket in 2006 and McCain in 2008

    Are the media wonks now going to go after the “Moderates” and “Independents”?

    I doubt it.

    That being said, it’s becoming increasingly apparent that this smirking brain addled piece of shit committed this heinious crime because… well… he’s a brain-addled piece of shit.

    That moron can’t even string together coherent sentences much less have a political agenda.

    At least he’s facing the death penalty.

    I wonder if he’ll still be smirking when they’re strapping him down…..

  8. 8
    LC hilljohnny, possom poker growls and barks:

    i am waiting for someone on the left to point out that jared was the victim of the evil gun that forced him to shoot those people and therefor we need more laws restricting law abideing citizens.

  9. 9
    Tallulah growls and barks:

    Hilljohnny, Mayor Prissypants Bloomberg is ALL OVER IT. Had the presscon already.

  10. 10
    Tallulah growls and barks:

    Oh, and Commie Couric is doing a SERIOUS PIECE tonight on the state of political discourse in the nation — tonight! I can hardly wait.

    If you look at the preview, they’ve already set it up: the solemn photo of the Ogabes grandstanding “mourning,” the graphics with “crosshairs,” and the rest. Just another go at pillorying the patriots.

  11. 11
    Shaitana growls and barks:

    Dear God even my own sister now is coming out and insulting me and calling names because she is tired of my posting political links on facebook. Gah. Everytime I try to point out inconsistencies or hypocrisies on the part of the media, I get slammed for being too political and too extreme and told I need to get a hobby and that I am no better than the leftards I bitch about.

    I don’t know what to do. I think I will just cry. I have said that before, but then again I am a woman so I’m allowed.


  12. 12

    I don’t know what to do. I think I will just cry. I have said that before, but then again I am a woman so I’m allowed.

    I wouldn’t sweat it. The label “Extreme” is often deployed by those who are confronted with uncomfortable truths that don’t match the narrative they have attached their beliefs to.

    Its a good sign you need to redouble your efforts rather than back off.

  13. 13
    M167A1 growls and barks:

    tsk tsk tsk….

    (best fake Russian accent)
    remember comrade, end justifies means and if girl can serve purpose, then death is not for nothing yes?

    as bonus the Zeks and backsliders will be more circumspect in future.

  14. 14
    Grammar Czar growls and barks:

    Response to Shaitana @:

    I totally understand. I got a call the other day from my sister, who raked me over the coals because I’m opposed to Obamacare. She railed about people not having insurance, and how would I feel if she and her sons didn’t (they do, and good insurance, too).

    The problem is that she is not logical, whatsoever, and it’s too hard to argue (debate) someone like that. I haven’t spoken to here since, and I’m not going to make the first move.

  15. 15
    Cortillaen growls and barks:

    Now that you’ve had your opportunity to spread your blood libel far and wide it’s time for everybody to shut up?

    I have to say I’m happy you’ve picked up that term for these events, Sire. It is perhaps the most accurate phrase to use in this situation. Unfortunately, too many people seem afraid to fight back against the false accusations of literal murder being leveled at us on the Right by people who do so in the name of pure politics. If calling their blood libel what it is makes people angry, good! It should! It makes me furious that these assholes can get away with the staggering hypocrisy of their actions and words, and it’s about time people drop the PC crap and call things as they are. Even my local talk-radio host, when I called in yesterday morning to argue that “blood libel” is how we need to describe the Left’s attacks, seems to shy away from the term as if it’s going too far. On the contrary, it isn’t far enough. The Left, their “reporters”, their agitators, and even those congressmen who were involved must be called to account for their false accusations, just as we would with anyone else who accused an innocent man of murder purely out of personal hatred. We wouldn’t settle for “Oh, well, everybody should just calm down” when it came out that the accused was absolutely innocent, and we shouldn’t settle for that now.

  16. 16
    Cortillaen growls and barks:

    Pardon the double-post. One other thing that really pissed me off last night: The list of charges (viewable here) against Loughner, namely “Ct. 1: 18:351C.F–Congressional, Attempt To Kill”. Apparently, in federal law, there is the heinous “attempted murder of a member of Congress”, and then there is the somewhat less horrid “attempted murder of some nobody”, evidenced by counts four and five being “18:1114 and 1113–Attempted Murder”. To think people wonder why our lords and masters in DC think they’re better than the rest of us. What could possibly give them that idea? Surely not having their own special laws…

  17. 17
    AyUaxe growls and barks:

    Apparently, there is a link between Loughner’s choice of target and political rhetoric–Gifford’s and the leftist shamnesty gang’s rhetoric:

    “Mr. Loughner said he asked the lawmaker, “How do you know words mean anything?” recalled Mr. Montanaro. He said Mr. Loughner was “aggravated” when Ms. Giffords, after pausing for a couple of seconds, “responded to him in Spanish and moved on with the meeting.”

    Loughner has the central attributes of a leftist–a poor grip on sanity and overinflated ego. Still, it shouldn’t be too surprising to democrat pols and they should use this “teachable moment” to recognize that while the weakest in society will be the first to crack, the alienation that was at least part of Loughner’s detour from sanity and humanity has been created by government’s rank refusal to respond to its citizenry.

    The other most notable tactical observation I’ve read about this incident is that, once again, citizens, not LEOs, made the apprehension and prevented more carnage, but no one was prepared to counter deadly force with equal force. A 61 year old woman, reportedly grabbed Loughner’s second mag before he could reload. Others wrestled him to the ground and ultimately disarmed him. If anyone else in the crowd had been armed and capable, mightn’t they have stopped this freak before he got off more than a couple of shots? That could have saved the life of the 9 year old girl and others.

    So yes, Loughner is gonna burn in hell for what he did and none of the victims should have suffered this. Now let’s get realistic about preventing such incidents by allowing, indeed encouraging the good citizenry to respond in defense and by continuing to demand that pols actually respect and respond to constituents, not just put on perma-grin and continue the quasi legal stealth sodomization of the citizenry they’ve been engaged in for the last few years. Or, of course, they can continue in the insanity which is leftist/national demoncrat policy–i.e. doing the same stupid, ineffective, infuriating shite over and over again while expecting different results. Seems they’ve got another Loughner connection there.

  18. 18
    Shaitana growls and barks:

    Ah… now my baby sis has reverted to insulting my mothering habits and skills. Not one single time does she actually try to debate the topics I am mentioning. Just the fact that I posted them.


  19. 19
    LC Subotai Bahadur, Lord Pao An growls and barks:

    #18 Shaitana

    I seem to remember a similar set of incidents in the past. If I may intrude [and if I may not just tell me to bugger the hell off, no problem]; when dealing with a mindset like this, you always have to balance whether a “peace” within the family is worth giving up what you believe. Yes, she is family. But she is also taking advantage of that special status to inflict pain on you in pursuit of her favored political position.

    I am a relative stranger to you, just knowing you from the Empire. Yet, I make the default assumption that you know how to raise your own kids, and are doing the best that you can. Circumstances of life may limit what that may be, but I do not doubt that you are a loving caring mother.

    She is trying to use the lever of family and emotional blackmail to convince you to back off from advocating your own political beliefs. There is a concept of “fighting fair” for couples, that applies also to other family members. You do not say or do things based on your personal privileged position that are unforgivable attacks. I have seen marriages fall apart over such things. Things said can never be truly called back. Emotional trust, once betrayed, does not return easily if ever. Attacking your ability as a mother for politics falls into that territory.

    And I am reasonably sure that if you struck back [verbally, not physically] that she would act betrayed that you would attack a family member that way. She [like most liberals] wants to have it both ways. Freedom to attack you , and yet you not being able to fight back.

    That is not a stable situation. Right now, you are in the worst possible position. You do not deserve to have that kind of pain inflicted on you by a “loved one” trying to manipulate you.

    I would suggest that you get out of that untenable middle ground. Either fight back; all fangs, and claws, and hair on fire …. or back off from her completely. Refuse to talk politics with her at all. Don’t stop doing what you are doing. She cannot take away your freedom of speech, just because she does not like what you say. But do not talk to her about it. If she does not leave you alone after that, or increases her attacks, then you have to decide how much contact with her is healthy for you and yours. And keep to what you decide. Don’t be guilted into returning to a vulnerable position. Because you have to take care of yourself and your immediate family first. You are a good person and do not deserve to be attacked, hurt, or manipulated by someone who claims to love you.

    Now this advice is probably worth what you are paying for it, and I am no lifestyles expert. Just a bloody-minded old fart who has been through a lot of things; some of which may be applicable elsewhere.

    Stay strong, and be at peace with what you are and what you believe.

    LC Subotai Bahadur, Lord Pao An

  20. 20
    LC Anniee451 growls and barks:

    I give credit to Obama for NOT using this as a “burning of the Reichstag” moment. SO FAR. (He may use it as such in future; I HOPE not.) He will gain umpteen points from me for NOT using it as such.

    “Nonviolent imagery from the left” http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621 Nope, no violence there, no sir.

    They want to play the skullfucking game and accuse us all of murder? GOOD LUCK ASSHOLES.

  21. 21
    Shaitana growls and barks:

    Yes the previous instance was a ‘friend’ who blew up at me because of my views on Obamacare. When I tried to mend fences later, she told me so long as I didn’t talk about anything she didn’t like then we could associate, if not, then she didn’t need me around. Talk about ballsy.

    My baby sister on the other hand. This hurt. I sat last night with my husband pointing out that she was going for what hurt the most because she can’t argue against me in the political arena. I spent a few hours last night parsing her comments in my head to see if they were even remotely true.

    I have opted for now to take the hands off approach. I pointed out the definition of Ad Hominem Arguments and left it at that. And the irony is that while my mom always preferred her over me, in this case, mom agrees with me politically. That has to bug her I guess.

    Thank you so much for the words of comfort. It really helps.

  22. 22
    Elephant Man growls and barks:

    Response to Shaitana @:

    When I read your previous comment, I was going to suggest something along the lines of “Stick to your beliefs and post whatever you want on your Facebook page and if anyone doesn’t like it, tell them to blow it out their ass!”

    However, upon reflection, I figured one of the more well-spoken LCs would come up with a more reasonable, less ham-fisted approach to your dilemma so I held off.

    After reading Subotai Bahadur’s comment, I’m glad I did.

    He’s “spot on” with his suggestions.

  23. 23
    AyUaxe growls and barks:

    Has no one else seen the WSJ reports on the “investigation” of Loughner’s rantings and writings relating to the Congresswoman? Broader political discourse had nothing to do with this, but some direct discourse between the wacko and his target did. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that the rest of the mediots and particularly the more leftist ones won’t report the facts. Of course no one wants to “blame the victim,” myself included. Nothing justified or even slightly invited what Loughner did. But it is interesting, with all the handwringing and finger pointing about “discourse,” that Loughren’s bizarre “beef” seems to have arisen from being derisively dismissed by his “public servant” at an earlier meeting. Congress critters need to stop criticizing our free speech and stop trying to separate and exalt themselves over us and start treating “even the least of these” among their constituents with respect.