Fort Hood under siege…AGAIN

Source

AT LEAST one shooter – possibly two – have gone on a violent rampage at the Fort Hood US military post in Texas.An unconfirmed NBC report said one person has been killed, at least eight injured and there are two possible shooters.The military post is in lockdown and soldiers have been ordered to take shelter immediately.

Wait…WHAT? Why are SOLDIERS “taking shelter”? WHY IN GOD’S NAME arent they armed, armoured and conducting this as a search and destroy mission? Four years and some fuckwit didnt have the single common sense to immediately issue weapons? Are you telling me on a MILITARY BASE, especially after the last massacre, that no one had a plan in place in case Abu Bin Bum Fuk and his pals tried it again?

Is the base STILL a “gun free zone”?

Just days ago, Fox News reported the FBI was searching for a recent Army recruit believed to be planning a “Fort Hood-inspired jihad against US soldiers”.

Hang on….and the base commander DIDNT order immediate security measures and doubled the guard? That four years have passed and a MILiTARY BASE is still a free fire zone for terrorists???

The 1st Cavalry Division, which is based at Fort Hood, sent a Twitter alert telling people on base to close doors and stay away from windows.

What the fuck?????????

‘Tyler’, a security officer at Fort Hood, taking shelter told KCEN via phone staff had been told to turn off their air ventilation systems.

A “security officer” is “taking shelter”? Why isnt he out there looking for the shooters? This is….God Almighty….I have no words…

UPDATE

Fort Hood, Texas: A shooter who opened fire at a Texas Army base is dead, after injuring several people and killing at least one, according to various US media reports citing officials.

Now taking bets as to the shooter’s name. Odds are 2 to one on a “man of Middle Eastern appearance”

30 comments

  1. 1
    readerjp growls and barks:

    I was just reading this story on another page. Nothing in it about two gunmen and nothing in it about jihad. BUT, the FBI is on scene. Like what are they going to do?

    It just shows you how dishonest the press is.

    And Nidal should have been executed a long time ago.

  2. 2
    LCBrendan growls and barks:

    And Nidal should have been executed a long time ago.

    Nidal should never have been allowed to leave that base alive.

  3. 3
    JonB growls and barks:

    Obama must be giddy with excitement and demanding videos so he can get off watching his brothers killing Americans.

  4. 4
    FrankOK growls and barks:

    I’m reserving my judgment until there’s something definite to read.
    FrankOK recently posted..Fishing – Good for the SoulMy Profile

  5. 5
    Terrapod growls and barks:

    Welcome to the new army, where lessons are not learned and political correctness reigns supreme. Sad and I am truly sorry for the familes of the dead and all the wounded, but after the last 2 attacks at military bases WHY THE FUCK are there no armed personnel assigned to patrol and on base? WTF has happened since 1970? Oh!? never mind, the hippies are now running the government. Sad state of affairs..

  6. 6
    LC Roguetek growls and barks:

    last news, shooter was not a muzzie.

  7. 7
    Eric Praline growls and barks:

    The shooter has been identified as a soldier. He has been identified at 34-year-old Ivan Lopez.

    Anyone wanna take bets on Ivan having recently changed his name to Mohammad?

  8. 8
    LCBrendan growls and barks:

    Obviously our thoughts and prayers are with the entire community and we are going to do everything we can to make the community of Fort Hood has what it needs to deal with a tough situation

    Except,of course, cancelling the “gun free zone” restriction.

  9. 9
    LC ShadowFox growls and barks:

    I want that little “Tyler” bastard found and shipped to Singapore for some appropriate punishment. I was listening to that station the whole time he was on and believe me he is NO ‘security officer’. He’s probably just some Pvt or PFC. He was hiding in his car both from the shooter AND from the police so that he could keep giving play by play to KCEN. I hope the shooter wasn’t listening to a tv because “Tyler” was the worst undermining of OPSEC since German television at the 76 Olympics!

  10. 10
    FrankOK growls and barks:

    I find it rather interesting that Allen West referred to the base as a “Free Fire Zone” but the generals denied it and don’t want to allow weapon carry by those charged with doing so in someone else’s yard.

    Pure and utter bullshit – when seconds count, the cops are minutes away, as one of the O7+ dickheads alluded to.

    It’s become evident why the white house infestation is playing musical generals.
    FrankOK recently posted..The junk is coming to take me away, ha-ha!My Profile

  11. 11

    The shooter was Puerto Rican, and didn’t see combat:

    http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/fort-hood-shooting/fort-hood-gunman-did-not-see-combat-iraq-tour-officials-n70691
    LC Aggie Sith, a goddess, only different, G.G.O.R. recently posted..Thursday RandomMy Profile

  12. 12

    No, he was not Muslim, nor did he convert at any point.

    More info from this morning.

    This sort of bothers me, and tell me if I’m just being overly sensitive.

    I saw a few Tweets yesterday by lunatic fruitcake Joseph Farah of WorldNutDaily. The first one was condemning Fox for making the call that this wasn’t terrorism, and there was another one in that vein. It’s like he was SURE that this was, indeed, terrorism and that there was some kind of conspiracy to not name it. Then his next Tweet was so absurdly stupid, I wanted to kick him in the raisins!

    Fort Hood II: This is what happens when a jihadist shoots 43 people at an Army base and Obama calls it “workplace violence”

    So somehow, even though we had no evidence at this point that this was terrorism or that this was in any way connected to Hasan, he was jizzing in his shorts at the thought of this being connected somehow and decided to draw correlation where there was none anyway.

    Several other random tweets in my feed also seemed to be creaming their pants at the thought of another Islamist attack!

    Why are we so fucking excited about this???? Shouldn’t we be hoping that it ISN’T? Or are we so far gone that we WANT it to be psycho muslims, so it kind of justifies our hate?

    Personally, I was glad it wasn’t another fucking camel botherer – not that the thought of a mentally disturbed vet makes me any warmer or fuzzier.
    LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch recently posted..This is getting ridiculous (UPDATED WITH A NOTE TO THE NUTBAGS)My Profile

  13. 13
    Eric Praline growls and barks:

    LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch @ #12:
    Speaking for myself, I wasn’t excited at the prospect of it being a jihadi attack. It’s just that, anytime some nut starts shooting random people anywhere in the world, the smart money is on it being a musloid (second place goes to progtards off their meds). It doesn’t always work out that way, but it’s usually a safe assumption.

  14. 14

    Eric Praline says:

    LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch @ #12:
    Speaking for myself, I wasn’t excited at the prospect of it being a jihadi attack. It’s just that, anytime some nut starts shooting random people anywhere in the world, the smart money is on it being a musloid (second place goes to progtards off their meds). It doesn’t always work out that way, but it’s usually a safe assumption.

    I completely agree, but you should have SEEN these fucking Tweets from some of these people! I could just literally see them wetting themselves at the thought of another Islamist attack! They were dancing around with joy! It was disgusting.
    LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch recently posted..This is getting ridiculous (UPDATED WITH A NOTE TO THE NUTBAGS) (DETERMINED TO BE A FAKE)My Profile

  15. 15
    HempRopeAndStreetlight growls and barks:

    You can think Clinton and Bush I for the defenseless state of our home-front military bases. Both had a hand in it. King George the first wanted to be “professional and business-like.” And Slick-Willy… well… old Billy-two-cigar was probably just afraid of a military coup, if you want my opinion on the matter…

  16. 16
    LCBrendan growls and barks:

    Personally, I was glad it wasn’t another fucking camel botherer – not that the thought of a mentally disturbed vet makes me any warmer or fuzzier.

    Which then begs the question: If he was a headcase why wasnt he relieved of his weapons?

  17. 17
    HempRopeAndStreetlight growls and barks:

    Why?

    Because the government thinks we are all headcases for even wanting to own scary black guns. Anything that gets in the way of the United States federal government taking weapons away from any member of it’s citizenry is a good thing from a freedom loving perspective – even if the price of that is some crazies turning gun free zones – which is another federal construct – into shooting galleries.

    Crazy is a sliding scale, and if yous tart down that path those bastards will abuse and abuse and broaden the definition of “crazy” until NOBODY can own a weapon period. People will die because of that sure – but liberty is not equal to safety. Regardless, the blood is on the moonbat’s hands – since they make even “reasonable” restrictions on any fundamental civil right impossible through their insatiable creep.

    We have no choice but to be absolutists here, since every “reasonable” compromise is seen by the fucktard leftists not as a place to stop,. but just another milestone in their never-ending quest to outlaw guns. And don’t forget, these massacres are only as bad as they are BECAUSE the shithead statists in this country made them into targets by banning weapons.

    They caused the problem, and now want to fix it by punishing US.

    Fuck that. Fuck that to death and shoot it twice in the head with a 12-guage. Not one damn more gun-law, and to be frank, I don’t care if it results in a shooting every day. the blood is on the anti-gunners hands, not on those of us opposing ANY gun laws.

  18. 18
    HempRopeAndStreetlight growls and barks:

    And not one more damn law pertains to anything that impacts guns rights in a round about way – such as medical or mental health trash. Crazies wading into a defenseless pool of blood CREATED by the anit-gunners is a problem that needs to be addressed by punishing the guilty parties. Not the citizenry of the united states.

  19. 19
    LCBrendan growls and barks:

    Hemp: I dont see a problem with relieving a guy of weapons, if he is under a psych care, or has been identified as mentally ill, as this guy was.

    Why do you?

  20. 20
    LC hilljohnny growls and barks:

    In one news article it said Lopez had recently taken leave to attend his mother’s funeral. In another that he was trying to get leave for his mother’s funeral on the day of the shooting. A third source mentioned his emotional problems and that he was taking Ambien and anti-depression meds. If he accidently took the Ambien that morning he could have been in a walking dream state when he did the shooting.

  21. 21

    LCBrendan says:

    Personally, I was glad it wasn’t another fucking camel botherer – not that the thought of a mentally disturbed vet makes me any warmer or fuzzier.
    Which then begs the question: If he was a headcase why wasnt he relieved of his weapons?

    Likely, because he wasn’t considered a danger to himself or others.

    But I don’t know. I wrote about it marginally here.
    LC Nicki the Resident Misanthropic Bitch recently posted..This douchenugget can’t possibly retire quickly enough!My Profile

  22. 22
    HempRopeAndStreetlight growls and barks:

    Hemp: I dont see a problem with relieving a guy of weapons, if he is under a psych care, or has been identified as mentally ill, as this guy was.

    Why do you?

    I made it crystal clear as to “why.”

    Please re-read.

  23. 23
    LCBrendan growls and barks:

    So yoiu’d be happy with some guy on psych drugs muttering about shooting people an okay person to keep a firearm?

    Say what, Willis?

  24. 24
    Emperor Misha I growls and barks:

    LCBrendan says:

    So yoiu’d be happy with some guy on psych drugs muttering about shooting people an okay person to keep a firearm?

    It’s not as simple as that. The thing is, to let government stick its nose under that particular tent means trusting government not to ever, ever overstep their boundaries and expand the definition of “mentally ill” until it encompasses everybody.

    And you know what they call people who trust government, don’t you?

    That’s right. “Landfill.”

    No, they can’t be trusted. Ever. Under any circumstances. Any of them.
    Emperor Misha I recently posted..“Tolerance”, Mozilla? You’re Doing it WrongMy Profile

  25. 25
    HempRopeAndStreetlight growls and barks:

    (Gonna correct the grammar a bit for getting my point across – not as a jab, I fully understand the lack of edit currently is a POS, so don’t take it the wrong way).

    So you’d be happy with some guy on psych drugs muttering about running people over an having an automobile?
    Say what, Willis?

    So you’d be happy with some guy on psych drugs muttering about bludgeoning people to death an having a hammer?
    Say what, Willis?

    So you’d be happy with some guy on psych drugs muttering about setting a school on fire an having a matches?
    Say what, Willis?

    So you’d be happy with some guy on psych drugs muttering about strangling people having a leather strap?
    Say what, Willis?

    So you’d be happy with some guy on psych drugs muttering about blowing people up having access to the gasoline?
    Say what, Willis?

    So you’d be happy with some guy on psych drugs muttering about poisoning people having access to pest or plant poisons?
    Say what, Willis?

    ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    1: Where do you want to stop with the whole mock-worthy “keep everybody safe from outlandish statistical outliers” thing? Nanny-state, or full on tyranny?

    The damage you inflict on free society trying to mitigate the insane and irrational is vastly worse than the problem – by orders of magnitude. So yeah, I am just peachy keen with anyone in America owning a gun – because the odds of them using it to hurt somebody are so ludicrously remote that I’d need to be a complete idiot to worry about them misusing it.

    2: As I already explained, Insanity is a subjective sliding scale, and one the moonbats are only too happy to abuse as a way to disarm vast swaths of the nation. I don’t like having to repeat my logical rationalizations. Please read better in the future. To drive the point home, last century was replete with totalitarian regimes using just such an excuse – among many – to disarm their serfs. If you think I, or anyone else, will stand aside and scuttle liberties at the behest disingenuous leftists who have ulterior motives, to solve a virtually non-existent problem, you’re not only suffering from reading comprehension difficulties, but also a bad judge of character.

    3: As I also stated already, these mass shootings (statistically insignificant as they may be), are a symptom of a disease – not the cause. The political class in this nation created these shooting galleries. The gun-free zones are THE PROBLEM. You can’t go on a shooting rampage amongst an armed society. Do you see mass shootings in Scheels or Caballas? Bass Pros? Gun Shows? Police stations? Shooting Ranges?

    _____________________________________________________________________________________

    So yeah, rather than give the libtards a blank check to take away the right to keep and bear arms at virtual will, I say “fuck that idea” – fuck it hard, shoot it in the face, skull fuck it, then set the body on fire, and shoot the ashes a few times for good measure.

    I’ll sleep like a lamb endorsing that position because:

    A: A smart person is more worried about getting killed in a car wreck.

    B: A crazy fucker hellbent on killing folks will find a way to do it weather he has a goddamned gun or not.

    All of this should have been unnecessary, since I’d just repeating what i already wrote.

  26. 26
    HempRopeAndStreetlight growls and barks:

    Sorry if that came off overly bitchy. Alimony check time always puts me in a foul disposition.

  27. 27
    LCBrendan growls and barks:

    That’s fine. I’m just sitting here trying to understand why you are okay with a guy that has been diagnosed a paranoid schizophrenic owning firearms.

    I may not trust the government, I sure as hell have an issue with a guy who has spent five years in a mental institute as a raving paranoid and is then released owing to funding cuts, being handed a semi auto firearm. Yes he can still get his hands on a gun, granted, gun ownership is a right, its also a responsibility.

    Yes?

  28. 28
    LC Xealot growls and barks:

    LCBrendan says:

    I may not trust the government, I sure as hell have an issue with a guy who has spent five years in a mental institute as a raving paranoid and is then released owing to funding cuts, being handed a semi auto firearm. Yes he can still get his hands on a gun, granted, gun ownership is a right, its also a responsibility.

    It’s not so simple. #1: Who does the evaluating of the diagnoses? DCF likes to take children away for all sorts of stupid reasons, including mental illnesses that are complete bullshit. How soon before the government would do the same thing with guns?

    The problem with regulation — pretty much ANY regulation — is that pliable morons are the ones doing the regulating. You can’t trust them to be fair, but you DEFINITELY cannot trust them to be competent. Since it is established, then, that they are neither moral nor competent, it is logical to suggest that they should NOT be regulating.

    I don’t want the crazy guy to have gun any more than you do, but it’s more important to ensure that WE have access to guns in case that crazy person does decide to do something stupid with the thing.
    LC Xealot recently posted..University StormMy Profile

  29. 29
    LCBrendan growls and barks:

    Xealot: I agree and I will state the honest truth: I dont know. Worst case scenario vs checks and balances…I dont know.

  30. 30
    Eric Praline growls and barks:

    This is why FEDGOVCO can’t be allowed to take 2nd Amendment rights away from someone because of a “diagnosed mental illness.”
    Psychiatrists are now labeling above-average creativity and cynicism as mental illnesses in DSM-IV.