“Butt Out, Parents, I Know Better!”

As the First Clydesdale uttered when yakking about FedGovCo’s latest power grab, mandating with the force of law what your kids can and cannot eat at school.

First Lady Michelle Obama said of deciding what American children should eat: “We can’t just leave it up to the parents.”

To borrow a particularly imbecilic phrase that we heard somewhere: “Yes You Can!”

Moreover, given our particular allergic reaction to the federal government butting into our personal affairs, a reaction that includes, but is not limited to, sudden yet alarmingly precise discharges of high-velocity projectile firearms, we strongly recommend that you do leave it to us.

Listen, Moo-chelle, we’re not at all opposed to you filling your meaningless existence with some hobby horse of yours, nor are we particularly in disagreement with you that too many of our youngsters are unnaturally well-endowed in the adipose tissue department, but it’s still none of Washington DC’s, or your, business.

And, and let us be frank here, the message you’re trying to convey would be ever so much more convincing if it came from somebody other than an ambulatory double-wide with a tendency to sneak off to gorge on french fries and burgers any chance she gets.

Imagine Nancy Reagan with pinhead pupils, a syringe in her hand and a latex tube wrapped tightly around her biceps saying “just say no.”

You dig?

But that’s not the point, really. The point is that you don’t get to tell us that we’re too stupid to raise our own kids, and if you try to use the force of law to do so, you won’t like the reaction. Because it’s none of ya bidness.

Oh, and thanks for your idiotic claim that childhood obesity is a “national security matter.” Now your retard hubby’s understudy, Janet Incompetano, will be sending out goons to dig around the crotches of three-year-olds for Twinkies and Ho-Hos.

We don’t begrudge you your hobby. You can plant collard greens all the way up and down The Mall if you so desire, but fuck with our Imperial Family and you’re going down. HARD.

So tell your Food Police to bring friends. Lots of them. We like target rich environments.

Thatisall.

P.S.: Oh, and could you tell your emasculated beta male hubby to try to hide the fact that he’s your trained poodle a little better? First we get to see him abdicating his office to Billy Blow Job because he doesn’t want to “keep you waiting” and now he’s up there saying that he had to sign your pet bill or he’d be sleeping on the couch.

It’s not that we don’t know that lil’ Hussein has less spine than a tape worm and that he lives in mortal fear of your jutting testicle shelf but, you know, could he at least pretend to be in charge of his job? For national security reasons?

Thatistrulyall.

44 comments

  1. 1
    Vinegar Joe bloviates:

    Somebody needs to put Michelle on a diet. Seriously. Have you seen the hams on that woman???

  2. 2
    Cheryl bloviates:

    But not to forget that Worf and Hussein The Nadless only stuff their over-indulged faces with the very BEST burgers, fries, pizza and ice creams. They have chefs prepare the goodies specially for them. No mere Jack in the Box or Wendy’s for the Royal Family.

    Question here is say Worf manages to get this particular totalitarian fantasy of hers enacted, and schools must only provide “healthful” fare, such as raw veggies and tofu to the little sweethearts, will a federal agent be there to force them to choke this crap down before they’re allowed to leave the cafeteria?

  3. 3
    MarineVet1995 bloviates:

    Not that your reply isn’t accurate, truthful, and jaw-breakingly funny, (emasculated lap dog, heh heh), but does this silly b*tch actually think that just because she says that kids can only eat whatever that they will listen? I know keeping mine off of drugs was fairly simple, (it is called good parenting) if labor and time intensive, but telling a 17 year old male, who hunts his own dinner a couple of times a week that he can’t eat a twinkie is gonna go over about as well as telling the ocean to ….. oh wait. That didn’t go over so well for someone, did it?

    Keep going, maybe Pelosi will sign onto this nonsense and finally cement the Dems demise. (I gotta wonder how Michael Moore feels about this?)

  4. 4
    Grammar Czar bloviates:

    Cheryl said the following:

    But not to forget that Worf and Hussein The Nadless only stuff their over-indulged faces with the very BEST burgers, fries, pizza and ice creams. They have chefs prepare the goodies specially for them. No mere Jack in the Box or Wendy’s for the Royal Family.
    Question here is say Worf manages to get this particular totalitarian fantasy of hers enacted, and schools must only provide “healthful” fare, such as raw veggies and tofu to the little sweethearts, will a federal agent be there to force them to choke this crap down before they’re allowed to leave the cafeteria?

    What about those schools that do not offer lunches (my children went to private school and had to bring their own lunches). Will parents be told what they can include in a sack lunch?

  5. 5
    LC TerribleTroy bloviates:

    Grammar Czar said the following:

    What about those schools that do not offer lunches (my children went to private school and had to bring their own lunches). Will parents be told what they can include in a sack lunch?

    Hey now this could create jobs! “Sack Inspector”. The position would fall under the DHS and they could use TSA trainers to train the new inspectors. :em93:

  6. 6
    Cheryl bloviates:

    What about those schools that do not offer lunches (my children went to private school and had to bring their own lunches). Will parents be told what they can include in a sack lunch?

    I was thinking the same thing, GC. Perhaps the TSA guard that searches for hidden Twinky and Funnybone contraband will inspect the home-packed lunch sack for forbidden items and confiscate. “No lunch for you!” Then a warning will be sent to the child’s parents that a fine will be in order the next time they do not adhere to the State’s dietary requirements. :em96:

  7. 7
    Vinegar Joe bloviates:

    “Sack Inspector” BWAHAHAHAHA! I’m not going there!

  8. 8
    Lizard, G.L.O.R. bloviates:

    Ok, I come from the side of having been on the adminstration side of school lunches. When I taught at parachiol schools we would have “hot” lunch 2 or 3 days a week if parents chose to pay for it. Guess where we got the food from McDonalds, Taco Bell, and Pizza Hut. My second year the fat ass principal decided that we could not have french fried with the hamburgers anymore and the kids got stuck with little bags of carrots instead. All those carrots that got thrown out by the upper grades. Those of us in the primary grades had more control and required that they eat at least a portion of their lunch before throwing it out. We were a private school and were allowed. Principal realized that fewer students were ordering on McDonald’s day and allowed for the french fries again because we made a small amount of money on the sale of each lunch.
    I then had to become a candy cop because the principal decided that the kids were not to be allowed to have candy or sugary snacks. That was a serious pain in the you know what.
    Then when I started working at a “Choice” School, or a voucher school. Schools that are private but tuition is paid by the state allowing low income parents to opt out of the public schools. Part of my administration duties was to oversee the federally funded school breakfast and lunch program. As federal mandates state you CANNOT require the kids to eat the food, so you know what happens they go through the line take the food and dump it in the trash can before they even sit down except for the desert if it is something that they like. So the kids do not eat breakfast or lunch, which affects their education(I hate sounding like a liberal but it is true) and when they get home are hungry and so their parents let them eat crap because to their knowledge their child ate healthy food in school.
    Yep, changing the school meal programs will just mean more government money being thrown in the trash unless they decide that they are going to force feed the little chillin’s.

  9. 9
    Patvann bloviates:

    I pity the fool that attempts to take food from my youngest..It would be bad, very bad.

    When yer growing at 15, going from 5-6 to 6ft, and from 130 to 190 in less than a year, yer gonna EAT.

    This eating of his is quite serious. VERY serious.

    The Klingon-in-Chief would be missing her hand if she tried to take away even ONE of the 5000-some-odd calories this kid eats per day. The teachers and administrators give this particular student (and MROTC-Sgt) a wide berth, as he is legend.

    -They also kinda “know how I get”, after having kids there for the past 6 years. :em93:

  10. 10
    Grammar Czar bloviates:

    I wonder how long until sack lunches are inspected for “contraband.” After all, it isn’t “fair” for a kid to bring cookies from home, when the kid buying lunch at school can’t have them.

    Isn’t liberal land all about being “fair”?

  11. 11
    Sir George bloviates:

    I think this effort is rather pointless, because what a kid eats at some particular meal isn’t that important, as the food intake is averaged out and ends up as poo anyway. But these new regulations do point to a far more important and serious issue, which isn’t what kids put in their mouths but what they put in their heads. A snack the child eats will only affect him for a few hours or days, but a book he reads can effect him for a lifetime.

    Which is why the federal government needs to regulate books in school libraries that take federal funds. Most, of course, should be banned as containing dangerous or socially unacceptable thoughts, images, or situations. Most of what Mark Twain wrote comes to mind, as does almost anything written after 1920. Ban it. Ban all of it, lest children be exposed to things far worse than a few extra calories that they’ll burn off on the playground.

    Perhaps these new food regulations will provide the precedent so the House can address the issue at the start of the next session.

  12. 12
    LC Roguetek bloviates:

    ok, so from what I gather, the law sez ‘the govt shall only provide -x- type of food’ correct?

    So, how long before they write policy stating that you cannot send your kid to school with a bag lunch, due to allergy risks/ZERO TOLERANCE/some other bullshit?

  13. 13
    LC SleepTech: bloviates:

    Since the last election, my typing, literary and English skills have failed BIGGTIME!!!

    However, I can now shoot the balls off the sub molecular flea on the molecular flea on the flea on a gnat’s left gonad from a thousand paces.

    What does this have to do with this post or thread?

    Your Leftist location, your leftist location, your leftist location!!!!!! :em01: :em95: :em03:

  14. 14

    But as long as the government is providing this food for less than cost or free, then the government can decide what to provide.

    But it isn’t provided for free. We’re paying for it. And we shouldn’t be.

    It isn’t the federal fucking government’s job to use the schools to feed anyone, and it certainly isn’t their job to feed them fucking breakfast.

    This bill is loaded down with federal nanny bullshit:

    One glaring example from the top of page 141(and there are other “programs” Floowups, surveys, and rule-making opportunities throughout this well-polished turd):

    ‘‘(2) PROGRAM.—The Secretary shall carry out a program to assist eligible schools, State and local agencies, Indian tribal organizations, agricultural producers or groups of agricultural producers, and nonprofit entities through grants and technical assistance to implement farm to school programs that improve access to local foods in eligible schools.”

    Really? Really?

    So the idiots in DC think that either the evil local farmers are all conspiring to keep their products out of the local schools;

    Or that the local schools are too stupid to know how to buy food from local producers;

    Or that farmers, who have been selling surplus product since they figured out how to move beyond subsistance farming were somehow too stupid to find a market for their wares.

    Thank God for those Haaaaavvvvvaaaarrrd edumincated loyahs in the Senate to help save the day for them with yet another fucking government program! How the hell did we ever make this far without them….and more importantly, how will we ever survive the application of even more layers of this bullshit?

    It isn’t free. It never was. And that’s the point.

    If I’m at the point where my kids need these lunches [Now with an extra .6 cents a piece in Federal Subsiudies and Grants!], its because these fucking theives in DC could not stop buying votes with MY money, and there was nothing left of MY money for me to spend on MY children’s food.

  15. 15
    LC SleepTech: bloviates:

    Blackiswhite, Imperial Consigliere said the following:

    But as long as the government is providing this food for less than cost or free, then the government can decide what to provide.
    But it isn’t provided for free. We’re paying for it. And we shouldn’t be.
    It isn’t the federal fucking government’s job to use the schools to feed anyone, and it certainly isn’t their job to feed them fucking breakfast.
    This bill is loaded down with federal nanny bullshit:
    One glaring example from the top of page 141(and there are other “programs” Floowups, surveys, and rule-making opportunities throughout this well-polished turd):
    ‘‘(2) PROGRAM.—The Secretary shall carry out a program to assist eligible schools, State and local agencies, Indian tribal organizations, agricultural producers or groups of agricultural producers, and nonprofit entities through grants and technical assistance to implement farm to school programs that improve access to local foods in eligible schools.”
    Really? Really?
    So the idiots in DC think that either the evil local farmers are all conspiring to keep their products out of the local schools;
    Or that the local schools are too stupid to know how to buy food from local producers;
    Or that farmers, who have been selling surplus product since they figured out how to move beyond subsistance farming were somehow too stupid to find a market for their wares.
    Thank God for those Haaaaavvvvvaaaarrrd edumincated loyahs in the Senate to help save the day for them with yet another fucking government program! How the hell did we ever make this far without them….and more importantly, how will we ever survive the application of even more layers of this bullshit?
    It isn’t free. It never was. And that’s the point.
    If I’m at the point where my kids need these lunches [Now with an extra .6 cents a piece in Federal Subsiudies and Grants!], its because these fucking theives in DC could not stop buying votes with MY money, and there was nothing left of MY money for me to spend on MY children’s food.

    Starting to see the relevance between ‘accuracy’ and the “Leftists” actual location???

  16. 16
    Sir George bloviates:

    It will be interesting to see if any schools drop out of the federal program because they were making more off the soft-drink and candy vending machines than they were getting in federal dollars.

  17. 17
    Grammar Czar bloviates:

    Response to LC Roguetek @:
    And how much money is going to be wasted when the kids refuse to eat the bean sprouts and tofu? You can lead a kid to the lunch line, but you can’t make him eat (for now, anyway).

  18. 18
  19. 19

    How about they use some freaking common sense and admit it’s NOT what the kids are eating that is the problem. Kids have been eating junk since the dawn of time and will continue to do so for eons more.
    What this mad cow needs to acknowledge is that obesity has been a problem right about the same time that they discontinued PE classes and turned competitive sports into competitive navel gazing in fear of hurting some little rolly polly’s feeewings if he’s not the MVP of the school soccer team.

    When kids sit on their ass all day and then go home and do the same thing in front of the X Box or computer…what the hell is the body supposed to do with all those calories? Hell you can get fat off nothing but carrots if you sit on your ass all day long.

  20. 20
    irish19 bloviates:

    Response to Blackiswhite, Imperial Consigliere @:
    I think you might be overreacting just a tad here.
    Unless I’m wrong, the whole point of the local foods thing is to help local producers and work their way through the mountains of red tape that get in the way of the schools’ being able to buy fresh produce from local producers.
    I reiterate that I could be wrong, but I know that if I am I can count on someone to correct me.

  21. 21

    I think everyone is missiong the main point. This is not about what kids do, or do not eat. What is at issue is creating a need for more food service workers (three lies in a single phrase there) employed in the school cafeteria, all of them paying union dues to SEIU, and each one of them an obese, unhygienic, TSA reject.

  22. 22
    Tallulah bloviates:

    Hey, some people keep their butts out all natural-like. :em02:

    The First Heifer has this to say to ALL YOU PEASANTS. Especially you HONKY PEASANTS.

    Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage.

    Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.

    Got that, crackahs?

    This sow takes the cake and sits in it, too (and Noel Coward says you can never, never do that. Though, judging by her semi-literate Princeton “thesis,” I doubt seriously that the sow knows who Noel Coward is).

  23. 23
    Cheryl bloviates:

    This sow takes the cake and sits in it, too

    …….thereby being able to consume the confection from BOTH ends. Saves time and energy.

    I remember the “Oblabla will require you to WORK speech” Something neither No Nads nor The First Sow would know anything about. Goll-ee! Fat Arse hasn’t lost any of her obnoxious, arrogant, ignorant edge, has she?

  24. 24

    Unless I’m wrong, the whole point of the local foods thing is to help local producers and work their way through the mountains of red tape that get in the way of the schools’ being able to buy fresh produce from local producers.

    What red tape might that be?

    Do counties and states micromanage schools (which are subdivisions under their jurisdiction) to the point that they make it difficult to procure food from local producers?

    Or is it some sort of federal nanny-state bullshit law where the Federal government somehow usurped authority and imposed “red tape” into a process where none need have existed?

    When the cure is as onerous as the disease, you can bet that both were originally a government “solution” to a perceived problem, and the distance of the government from the cure is in inverse proportion to its deliterious effects.

  25. 25
    LC PrimEviL bloviates:

    The point that everyone seems to be missing here, is that this bill is not
    about children, nutrition, or obesity.

    It’s just one more incremental power-grab, minus (as usual) all consideration for the realm of unintended consequences, over-
    reaching, and mission creep.

    Oh, and speaking of over-reach, and mission creep; the TSA hits the road.

    The operation created a big distraction to motorists heading eastbound on I-20 in rush hour, and many motorists let the AJC and the WSB traffic center hear about it.

    But the operation, which also involves the Transportation Security Administration, is top-secret before it happens, Minerly said.

    How nice, now TSA is conducting secret ops on the nation’s highways. Say “Hellooooooo Police State!” Never mind that it’s been shown that highway checkpoints do little, if anything to curb crime.
    This happened back in late September. I’m surprised it didn’t get more media attention. (Or am I?)

  26. 26

    I hate to break it to you, but MOST of “We The People” do support a limited safety net.. The main argument is on what those limits are going to be. I am on the austerity side of those limits.

    I hate to break it do you, but serving breakfast at school extends well beyond a limited safety net. It is, however, one more example of how power-hungry semi-elected officials get to buy votes with taxpayer money.

    And of course, when “WE THE PEOPLE” register our abject displeasure at this sort of behavior and the implementation of new expansions of entitlments without the authority to do so, like say a take over of individual patient data, and health care insurance, our employees insist that they know better than we how our money should be spent, that we’re ignorant, that we are extremists, and that government can do whatever it wants in our name (Thanks Congressman Stark! That one never gets old!).

  27. 27
    Grammar Czar bloviates:

    Blackiswhite, Imperial Consigliere said the following:

    our employees insist that they know better than we how our money should be spent, that we’re ignorant, that we are extremists, and that government can do whatever it wants in our name

    :em69:

  28. 28
    Lizard, G.L.O.R. bloviates:

    Grammar Czar said the following:

    I wonder how long until sack lunches are inspected for “contraband.” After all, it isn’t “fair” for a kid to bring cookies from home, when the kid buying lunch at school can’t have them.
    Isn’t liberal land all about being “fair”?

    Already happening healthy food and no junk food rules already in effect at most schools.

  29. 29
    Lizard, G.L.O.R. bloviates:

    Blackiswhite, Imperial Consigliere said the following:

    I hate to break it to you, but MOST of “We The People” do support a limited safety net.. The main argument is on what those limits are going to be. I am on the austerity side of those limits.
    I hate to break it do you, but serving breakfast at school extends well beyond a limited safety net. It is, however, one more example of how power-hungry semi-elected officials get to buy votes with taxpayer money.
    And of course, when “WE THE PEOPLE” register our abject displeasure at this sort of behavior and the implementation of new expansions of entitlments without the authority to do so, like say a take over of individual patient data, and health care insurance, our employees insist that they know better than we how our money should be spent, that we’re ignorant, that we are extremists, and that government can do whatever it wants in our name (Thanks Congressman Stark! That one never gets old!).

    The reason why the breakfast program was started was because studies show that kids who do not eat breakfast struggle more than those who do not. Unfortunately because of how the program is regulated most kids past the age of 3rd grade don’t bother to eat the breakfast they are given because it is not cool and not the crap that they want to eat and federal regs prevent telling a child they have to at least eat part of the meal. So the meal is just tossed out. Why give the kid a tray of food you know is going to be tossed out, because if the child does not take possession of the food the school cannot record that meal for reimbursement from the Federal government.
    It is a system that has many many more flaws, I know too much about it and it sickens me how much taxpayer money is abused and how much corruption goes on. I bet I could get anyone qualified for free(tax-payer paid) meals, I could but would not do this since it disgusts me and is illegal. You just have to fill out the forms in the right way.

  30. 30
    Lizard, G.L.O.R. bloviates:

    Here is where I really get upset over this program, we supply applications for the meal programs in 25 languages other than English. This just annoys me to no end. If you want the help learn the language. :em96:

    Another thing that I am hacked off about, income eligibility run July 1-June 30. They are still using eligibility levels for the 2009-2010 school year because they do not have the requirements determined for the 2010-2011 school year even though it is 6 months into the time period. Government at work again :em96:

  31. 31
    R6 bloviates:

    The “government” IS “We The People”.

    You are an extraordinarily stupid sack of meat.

    By the way deej, have I told you recently that you are a piece of shit?

    No?

    Okay, deej, you are a piece of shit. Please get the fuck out of my country.

  32. 32
    R6 bloviates:

    Oh, I forgot.

    You are a kanadian and have “dual” citizenshit like the homey in the white house. Do us all a favor and stay a kanadian.

  33. 33
    R6 bloviates:

    Why don’t you come up here and force me, you little dork?

    You want to be careful what you wish for.

    Very careful.

  34. 34
    R6 bloviates:

    As far as “your” country? Sorry, Nancy-boy, but I was here first. Why don’t you get out of MY country? Oh wait, you are in Texas. Why not just secede?

    I suspect that you are a queer boy with no roots in this country.

    Me? I’m a native American Indian. My feathers and dead buffalo trump your pale skin and acceptance of fudge packers.

    By the way, we REAL Americans tend to express our displeasure by removing that which you pale faces lose as a matter of course.

    Hair. And usually it has a little more attached when we show said displeasure.

  35. 35
    R6 bloviates:

    I am a Canadian citizen, and to my knowledge we “participants” in the healthcare system have no choice about participating–the monthly premiums are deducted from our paycheques just like our taxes are. So the only way to avoid paying is either tax evasion(which is illegal) or stop working for a living and starve or start sucking the gov’t welfare teat.
    So call it “monthly premiums” or taxes, it’s still a government mandated wealth transfer from the haves to the have-nots. In other words somebody is forced to subsidize someone else’s responsibilities.

    HAH!!

    There you go deej. You suck on both sides of the Northern border. I bet you can’t even see russia from YOUR front porch.

    Loser.

  36. 36
    R6 bloviates:

    And damn deej, I’m haten’ on you even with a paycheck, TWO three day weekends in a row and a seriously loud session of the Eagles “The Long Run” blaring in my ears.

    You suck more than I thought.

  37. 37
    irish19 bloviates:

    Response to Blackiswhite, Imperial Consigliere @:
    IIRC, I read that there are a lot of inspection and testing requirements as well as documentation requirements that must be met in order to be approved as a supplier of food to a school or school system. (Relatively) small local producers are just not set up to deal with it. Hence the program.

  38. 38
    R6 bloviates:

    You should come visit. I will show you my wood chipper.

    You sick fuck, I have no desire to see what you jam in trees up there.

  39. 39
    R6 bloviates:

    I have to admit deej I’m impressed. When canadians think you are full of shit you have risen to the obumfuck level of shit spewing.

    That’s quite a feat if you really are Caucasian.

  40. 40
    Grammar Czar bloviates:

    You paid a very tiny fraction of the cost to provide all of that to you. How about you pay for the entire shebang, just for yourself? You couldn’t do it, so you, along with everyone else is subsidizing each other so that you can have that road, that toilet flush, this internet to communicate with.

    This is semantics. You are using the word subsidy to mean something it doesn’t really.

    sub·si·dy
    ? ?/?s?bs?di/ Show Spelled[suhb-si-dee] Show IPA
    –noun, plural -dies.
    1.a direct pecuniary aid furnished by a government to a private industrial undertaking, a charity organization, or the like.
    2.a sum paid, often in accordance with a treaty, by one government to another to secure some service in return.
    3. a grant or contribution of money.
    4.money formerly granted by the English Parliament to the crown for special needs.

    When I fly, I am not contributing. I am paying for a service that I use. It’s voluntary. When I buy groceries, I am not contributing. I am paying for a service that I use. It’s voluntary. When I pay my doctor, I’m not contributing. I’m paying for a service that I use. It’s voluntary. This is private sector. These are not subsidies.

    When my taxes go to support the National Endowment for the Arts, that’s a contribution, a subsidy. I get NOTHING in return.

    Using private sector examples as an argument is specious. Most of those are voluntary.

  41. 41
    Grammar Czar bloviates:

    We are mixing apples and oranges here.

    PUBLIC infrastructure is paid for by my taxes, so, yeah, I suppose it’s a “subsidy” of sorts. A TRUE subsidy is money going in to support something when there is no ROI…like MIcro$oft writing a check to Apple every month to subsidize them. The only thing MS gets out of it is that they aren’t hauled up on anti-trust violations.

    I don’t “subsidize” the airlines if I don’t fly. I don’t “subsidize” Walmart if I shop at Target. If I donate to walmart (or am forced to pay taxes to support them), and I don’t shop there, THAT becomes a subsidy.

    A true subsidy is like us providing for the NEA (arts, not education). I get NOTHING in return. NOTHING. I helped subsidize government motors. I got NOTHING in return. The least they could have done was send me a new car, since I paid for one.

  42. 42
    R6 bloviates:

    Damn deej,

    I thought you were a smart guy just playing dumb.

    But you’re an idiot.

    You flunked government 101 and that surprises me.

    or you are just a commie with an agenda.

    oh. nevermind.

  43. 43
    R6 bloviates:

    I need to go hunt up my SMLM card from when I was in Europe during the cold war in case I come across your propane driven commie mobile.


Other websites that have referenced this:

(Always a sign of good taste -- especially since they bothered to link to us) Go Check them out
  1. Townhall: “We Can’t Just Leave It Up to the Parents” | Katy Pundit

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.