Fmwoods01 @:
i bought a lot of gold

expatchris: Indeed it is.

Pengor the part of your statement that is more important than the prez is :-I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; the new prez is a perfect fit for that one line and as far as I can find out (I was English) the constitution is the most precious possession of the USA.

bruce @:

That’s a pretty bleak scenario, feel fortunate that you have a savings to ship although I suspect they will attempt to slow down the flow of citizen’s money out of the country, (maybe the illegals’ money as well), so they’ll get their hands on more to throw down that bailout scheme rat-hole. I’ll bet Algore wishes he thought of that

D’

president buckweat is a racist, commie traitor who will try to steal our freedoms.they are already lining up censorship and anti-gun bills for teh one to drool on wonder full.anti-gun bill is sponsored by a black panther from you guessed it,Illinois,now i wonder just who he wants to disarm?i don’t see any republicans sounding the alarm or denouncing the stimulus bill which is a social spending give away however white males will not be eligible for any money or jobs.this is racist crap and it will only get worse when he grants amnesty to millions of criminals.i have already started to move my savings over seas where he can’t get his commie paws on it.

Pengor sez:

There has been no evidence presented that he was not eligible to be president.

That isn’t the problem I have with the whole citizenship thing. The problem is that he has presented no (legitimate) evidence that he IS eligible to be president. The burden of proof was on him, and he won’t provide his original birth document.

He is hiding something. There are other documents he won’t provide either. Why won’t he provide them, unless they don’t match his, “life story” as it has been told to us?

Pengor @ #98

… according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

The above is the “qualifier”. If an order is unlawful then one is not obligated to follow it. However, you had better have your ducks in a row if you do this. Somehow, I don’t believe we would have too much of a problem with the majority of our men and women currently serving (along with those of us who still feel obliged to honor and follow the oath to our graves) following any unlawful order issued by the new Commander in Chief.

And, as for oaths (or oafs), I, too, was military, and I, too, took the oath. However, I answer to a higher authority. If the president’s orders are contrary to God’s, then I have NO choice whose to obey.

“Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s, and unto God that which is God’s.”

Pengor sez:

and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

But if the president’s orders go counter to regulations or the UCMJ?

I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

Notice the line about obey the orders of the president. An enlistment may end, but the oath does not. There has been no evidence presented that he was not eligible to be president. It was all hear say from a batty old woman. He is the legal president. God help us all.