59 and Counting…
Since we don’t want to speak about “that movie”, it being unworthy of our attention, it is good to see that somebody else is taking the time to pick it apart in a systematical and well-sourced fashion.
It seems to us to be a pointless pursuit, since the only ones likely to actually buy into that rancid pile of propaganda wouldn’t be convinced that their obscenely obese idol was telling anything but the gospel truth even if he were to sign a written confession to being full of it.
But, at any rate… People have been asking for actual examples of lies and deceptions in the “fatumentary”. Well, here are 59 of them, for starters.
And a personal comment: It’s not so much that Michigan Fats has created a big, bloated turd of a lie. It’s that it’s so incredibly incompetently made. Of course, that only serves to speak volumes about the intellectual capacity of the drooling morons that actually believe what it’s peddling.
But we already knew that, didn’t we?
Categories: A.-I. Whup-ass | 
Tags: | 
14 Comments »
First?
Yes!
A friend of mine points out how Fraud-n-hate 9/11 is a reversal of Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451.
Yet it seems to have struck a chord all over America, even in the most unlikely of places.
I wonder what that means?
Oh and here’s a much better breakdown of some of the bullshit in F-9/11 from a source with less strawmen and agenda.
So bullshit strikes a chord with certain people. In the immortal words of Henry “Nostrilitis” Waxman, “So what?”
I think we’re supposed to cower in fear at the “discovery” that there are some idgits that will happily swallow anything they hear, zetetic.
saliva, there are slobbering fuckwidgets in every locale, so why should Fayetteville, NC be any different from the rancid cesspool that you call “home”?
Remember, if it weren’t for us “Kowboy Amureekunz” you’d be Shpreckin Zee Doytch and slopping out some National Socialist hog pens for your daily slop.
Now go play “Hide the Falafel?” with your soon-to-be masters down at the local MoonGod Mosque?. We hear, from the limp-wristed Spanish Socialists, that they’ll “go easy” on you Frogs if you swallow and don’t scrape their crank with your teeth. (Since you’re part of the EUnuchistani Socialized Medicine System?, most of you probably don’t have enough teeth to worry about that last part.)
(sigh)
Salvage, dumbasses, like weeds, cultivate everywhere. There are anti-war left leaners in the military itself-a near inexplicable paradox, and I hope they leave the service as soon as possible. Many have. Then youve got military wives, who are mostly quite young and get pretty ornery when their husbands are gone, and their emotions get the best of them and they begin to resent the president, regardless of principles.(In fact, theyre a pretty whiny lot in general.)
How do I know this? Im in the Army. I live in Fayetteville. I have a military wife, and I see the correspondence all the time from other younger wives. These are not sensible people. They are immature.
Lastly, I think alot of the hoo-ha about this film is simply due to its subject matter:It is about, ostensibly, 9/11. That will put people in the seats even if they dont know who Michael Moore is. And the film is being sold that way on TV: the ads are totally nondescript(less than 10 seconds long). You get no feeling of what the movie is about, just the basics, something about Bush, something about 9/11. They dont want to let on to ordinary folks that this is a slanted and biased film.
Sire, the hops and malt fog my memory…
Did I not comment about some useless daytime show calling this film an “agendamentarty”? ( because it is SOME facts, morphed into a documentary)
I will admit I’m pretty smart, I make alot of typos, but this ‘lard-ass’ film is no more than anti-Bush propaganda. Bush is not my Messiah, my God, my Alah, but Bush, if you look beyond DU and Indy sites, is just ( sing Dukes of Hazzard song now if you know it..) ‘a good ol’ boy’. He is respectful, spiritual and just seems like a guy you could have a beer with. I disagree with many of his ideas, but he is a damn fine man to have in charge while people are trying to kill us en masse. ’nuff said.
1st things 1st. I have NOT seen the movie.
I *do* like Mr. Moore’s commentary on Korporate AmeriKa (“Roger & Me,” “The Big One”).
What I don’t like is the shrill tone; the last concert I went to my ears rang for three days (not a pleasant experience)…perhaps I am getting to old for that sort of thing.
Anytime I hear any commentary (and I do mean *any* commentary) on the upcoming elections or the Iraq war, I am very unpleasantly reminded of that experience.
Is Bush a corrupt lunatic bent on dominating the world for Korporate interests? If he is then he’s not too different from our former president, who was so in bed with the PRC/CCP that I’m glad he’s out of office.
I favor assuming guilt with regards to Saddam Hussein and the WMD claims (cyclosarin shells, anyone?). I do NOT like the idea of US troops, foreign troops and Iraqi civilians getting the short end of the stick during the occupation; I do not, however, think that it is possible to have the best of both worlds; the administration has taken military action, occupied the country, and are dealing with the costs; could there have been another way? I don’t know but I am glad that Papa Saddam is in custody and awaiting trial. His execution will be one to watch. Now, if there is anything that can be done about those Mullahs over in Iran…you know those one’s w/ the nuclear weapons programs that are not actually weapons programs….bombs away…
Commandante-
Now, if there is anything that can be done about those Mullahs over in Iran…you know those one’s w/ the nuclear weapons programs that are not actually weapons programs….bombs away…
Is it just me, or is there a nuclear strike against someone ( probably the US) in the cards in the near future?
I think one nuke strike gives us the right, fuck the UN and the rest of the world, to retaliate with overwhelming force ( nuke=nuke) . It had to be a famous dead white guy;Nimitz, Patton, someone, that said you must use ungodly superior firepower to win. I feel pain for the innocents that will fry for the beliefs of the few, masked cowards doing all this shit. But if it be nuke, then may God have mercy on our souls, and smite the enemy into oblivion. ( My militarily literate buddy says one of our nuke subs can wipe out every major city on the planet….and these douch bags don’t care….maybe after watching everyone and everything they have ever known blown to atoms will wake them up.) But I doubt it. Too bad. I hate to see people die…..but beter an asshole with a sword over someone’s head whom is hooded, than me.
A scary state of affairs indeed.
Fortunately, Saddam’s trial will continue over the next few weeks to focus world attention on REAL atrocities, committed by Saddam and his thugs, and this will seriously weaken the moonbat howling re Bush!
Moore’s being shown up for a mendacious, calumniating liar, who uses half-truths, out-of-context truth, surgically-manipulated truth and human lower-nature to bloviate against all that’s good in America!
“These are the new Minutemen, Bush! Get it? They aren’t fedayeen or terrorists!”
Your meanness and smallness of spirit are obvious, Fat Mike. Your loathing and hatred of America and her troops gets out in the public eye, for all to see! Shame on you, Lickspittle!
Correct URL for Mark Urbin’s comment on “FU-911″.Sorry folks.
What I want to know is why is this fat twinkie eating piece of shit still breathing my air? I pray for the day I see this cunt with legs choke to death on a Big Mac on live TV, then I’ll go shit on his grave….getting it on video of course.
After a great weekend of having a good time with friends along with a couple instances of grilling, back to being online.
Did anyone catch Meet the Press this Sunday? Was a hoot, we had Nader on talking about Michael Moore. Turns out Mr. Moore at one time worked for Nader. Who would have thought that? Then Nader showed what a busy-body he is, he said he sent Michael Moore a letter telling him that he needs to lose weight.
And speaking of Saddam, a Knight Ridder article that appeared Sunday mentioned how countries supported Saddam. The only country they mentioned was the United States. Gee, more bias; guess Chirac and France selling Saddam a whole nuclear complex is not as important as the US selling some old parts to Saddam.